[SOLVED] Value of Stakeholder Analysis

DiscussionsM6D1: What’s the Value of Stakeholder Analysis? FALL – 15 WEEK 2020 Home Announcements Modules Grades People Conferences Writing and Anti-Plagiarism Participation Tool Excelsior College Library Guide TutorMe Support Resources Manage Discussion This is a graded discussion: 0 points possible due – M6D1: What’s the Value of Stakeholder Analysis? No unread replies. No replies. This discussion will simulate a face to face discussion in a classroom. We will go through the questions as a group beginning with the first question. As we answer each of the questions, we will move to the next one together. Read what others have said and add to the discussion in a substantive manner. The first question in this discussion is opinion and experience-based, so you can begin immediately. For subsequent questions please meaningfully integrate what you learned from the videos and articles as well as additional supportive articles or videos that you choose to include. In your opinion, based on what you have learned throughout your studies:   Often, health professionals rely more heavily on their experiences than on data gathering. Practice wisdom is often the gold standard for providers. Compiling a comprehensive list of potential stakeholders in a situation and their perspectives can seem daunting or unnecessary. Suppose a health professional said: “Why should we waste our time analyzing the various stakeholder groups? I have years of practice to draw on.” How would you respond? Now, read the assigned book chapter on stakeholder analysis  (Links to an external site.)  and then engage in a conversation on the following discussion questions, one at a time: The article discusses the role of data collection in the process of conducting a stakeholder analysis. As you read about data collection, what techniques do you feel are most valuable in gathering this information? Why? What techniques might be less useful or yield information that might be biased? Why? Sometimes, stakeholder groups are clearly at odds with each other. How can we deal with these differences? Is there a way to acknowledge these differences and come to a solution? Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.”  To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post. This discussion will be graded using the SHS Discussion rubric. Please review this rubric prior to beginning the discussion. You can view the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. All discussions combined are worth 25% of your final course grade. Participation in this discussion assesses the following module outcomes: Evaluate the needs and perceptions of diverse stakeholder groups in addressing health issues. (CO 3) Compare and contrast information-gathering methods in the analysis of stakeholder groups. (CO 3) Conduct a stakeholder analysis related to your area of emphasis. (CO 3)