Herzing University Electronic health record Ethical Case Study

Herzing University Electronic health record Ethical Case Study Herzing University Electronic health record Ethical Case Study I’m working on a Nursing question and need guidance to help me study. Describe how patient information entered into an electronic health record is used in patient evaluation and clinical decision making. Define meaningful use metrics. Consider how work-flow can contribute to patient outcomes and affect patient safety. Discuss the role of the inter-professional team, communication and the use of theElectronic Health Record (EHR) affect on patient outcomes. Write a 2-3-page paper in APA format responding to each of the questions following the case study. Note:- The paper will be submitted through the Canvas. TurnItIn and Grammarly should report no more than 15% originality. Criteria Ratings Pts Topic NU225-CO2; NU225-CO3 15.0 pts Level 5 Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points. 13.5 pts Level 4 Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points. 12.0 pts Level 3 Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points. 10.5 pts Level 2 Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused. 9.0 pts Level 1 Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable. 0.0 pts Level 0 Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment. 15.0 pts Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views PRICE-P 25.0 pts Level 5 Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more). 21.67 pts Level 4 Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 18.33 pts Level 3 Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 15.0 pts Level 2 Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified. 11.67 pts Level 1 Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches. 0.0 pts Level 0 Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches. 25.0 pts Content NU225-CO2; NU225-CO3 25.0 pts Level 5 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 22.0 pts Level 4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 20.0 pts Level 3 Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 18.0 pts Level 2 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 16.0 pts Level 1 Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. 0.0 pts Level 0 There is no evidence of a defined statement. 25.0 pts Analysis NU225-CO2; NU225-CO3 25.0 pts Level 5 Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 22.0 pts Level 4 Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 20.0 pts Level 3 Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 18.0 pts Level 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 16.0 pts Level 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 0.0 pts Level 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 25.0 pts Conclusion 15.0 pts Level 5 Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings. 13.0 pts Level 4 Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings. 11.0 pts Level 3 Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings. 9.0 pts Level 2 Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings. 7.0 pts Level 1 States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings. 0.0 pts Level 0 States an illogical conclusion from findings. 15.0 pts Limitations and Implications 15.0 pts Level 5 Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications. 13.0 pts Level 4 Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications. 11.0 pts Level 3 Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications. 9.0 pts Level 2 Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications. 7.0 pts Level 1 Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported. 0.0 pts Level 0 Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant. 15.0 pts Writing 15.0 pts Level 5 The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 13.5 pts Level 4 The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 12.0 pts Level 3 The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 10.5 pts Level 2 The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 9.0 pts Level 1 The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0.0 pts Level 0 The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 15.0 pts APA PRICE-I 15.0 pts Level 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 13.5 pts Level 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 12.0 pts Level 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 10.5 pts Level 2 The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 9.0 pts Level 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0.0 pts Level 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. 15.0 pts Total Points: 150.0 ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service . Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

RECOMMENDED: Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper