Discussion: Research Design Qualitative Quantitative & Mixed Methods Capstone

Discussion: Research Design Qualitative Quantitative & Mixed Methods Capstone ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: Research Design Qualitative Quantitative & Mixed Methods Capstone Capstone Change Project Evaluation 250 words with refs, please see attached for details. I also attached previous weeks assignments for refrance to write this week. Thanks. Discussion: Research Design Qualitative Quantitative & Mixed Methods Capstone capstone_change_project_evaluation_plan.docx capstone_change_project_resources_final.edited.docx strategic_plan_summary_final.edited.docx week_4_capstone_ Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention. The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Change Project Resources Aynur Kabota Grand Canyon University NRS-493 11/01/2020 Organizational support is essential for an effective change project to enhance care outcomes. The proposed change project is implementing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the organization for better wound care than standard practice. This proposed project requires organizational resources for effective implementation and efficacy in achieving the desired objectives. Some of the objectives include reducing the length of stay and infection; hence the intervention needs to implement specific procedures for these objectives. The highlighted objectives can be achieved by significant organizational support for the project. This paper lists and discusses the primary organizational resources required for implementing NPWT in the organization. NPWT portable device The preferred technology for this intervention is an NPWT portable device. This portable device is relatively new compared to the traditional NPWT devices. This resource’s importance is its convenience in attending many patients, and it is also more effective than traditional NPWT devices (Foglia et al., 2017). The resource is central to the intervention implementation because it will be required by nurses to conduct new practice processes. The supply for these devices will depend on the scope of the intervention in the organization. Foam dressings NPWT devices are used with a foam dressing, which is changed every time NPWT processes are carried out on the wound. This resource is different from standard care dressing due to the use of NPWT. Therefore, access to an adequate supply of foam dressing to use with the NPWT devices will be required from the organization. The supply of this resource will depend on the number of patients included in the intervention group. Training and supervision Another essential resource for effective NPWT implementation is training and supervising the nurses to carry out the intervention. Since this is a new approach, nurses in wound care will need to be trained on the relevant practice approaches and implement the approach effectively. A crucial observation in research is that nurse competence can affect the efficacy of NPWT (Karlakki et al., 2016). The organization will need to implement and train nurses and supervise nurses to ensure optimal utilization of the device and procedure to produce the best health outcomes. Pharmacological and non-drug therapies Research shows that NPWT is accompanied by considerable pain due to foam dressing (Téot, Boissiere, & Fluieraru, 2017). Patients undergoing this process will need effective pain management to reduce intervention-related pain. Thus, the organization will need to implement both pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain therapies to effectively manage pain and enhance patients’ experience and satisfaction with care. These resources will be crucial in supporting the intervention and enhance the effectiveness References Foglia, E., Ferrario, L., Garagiola, E., Signoriello, G., Pellino, G., Croce, D., & Canonico, S. (2017). Economic and organizational sustainability of a negative-pressure portable device for the prevention of surgical site complications. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, 9, 343. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S128139 Karlakki, S. L., Hamad, A. K., Whittall, C., Graham, N. M., Banerjee, R. D., & Kuiper, J. H. (2016). Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: a randomised controlled trial. Bone & Joint Research, 5 (8), 328-337. https://online.boneandjoint.or g.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/2046- 3758.58.bjr-2016-0022.r1 Téot, L., Boissiere, F., & Fluieraru, S. (2017). Novel foam dressing using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation to remove thick exudate. International Wound Journal, 14 (5), 842-848. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12719 Discussion: Research Design Qualitative Quantitative & Mixed Methods Capstone Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10