Critical Thinking 3 – Healthcare Information Systems

Critical Thinking 3 – Healthcare Information Systems ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Critical Thinking 3 – Healthcare Information Systems Explore the functionality of the health information exchange (HIE). Both regional and local exchanges can provide benefits to both patients and healthcare providers. Evaluate the benefits and level of adoption of these information exchanges. Relate these benefits to population health management. Evaluate the value and usefulness of information exchanges. Analyze and suggest how patient continuity of care can be improved by access to an HIE. Critical Thinking 3 – Healthcare Information Systems Your paper should meet the following requirements: Be 4-6 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. Include 3-5 references, in addition to the textbook. Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list. Be formatted according to APA Formatting Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the module folder. Reach out to your instructor if you have questions about the assignment. APA Writing Format! Need’s a title page Font – Use a 12-point Times New Roman! Spacing – Double space all text including the reference list and block quotes on all Assignments. All margins should be set to 1? on each side of the paper. Page numbers go in the upper right corner in the header. Headers: Page 1 Running head: YOUR TITLE IN CAPS 1 Page 2… YOUR TITLE IN CAPS 2 The running head goes in the upper left corner and is in all capital letters. The words “Running head:” appear only on the cover page. No Blue and underling in references (Remove the hyperlink) References should be on a separate page ********Always good to break up your paper with subheadings hcm570___ct___grading_rubric.docx heathcare_information_systems___a_practical_approach_for_healthcare_management__ch.3.pdf heathcare_information_systems___a_practical_approach_for_healthcare_management__ch.4.pdf at_the_intersection_of_health_information_technology_and_decision_support___measurement_feedback_systems___and_beyond.pdf development_and_te PRINT HCM570: Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 03 Content, Research, and Analysis Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Requirements 15 to 13 Points Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12 to 10 Points Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 9 to 7 Points Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6 to 4 Points Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Content 15 to 13 Points Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of HIEs or EHRs; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 12 to 10 Points Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge HIEs or EHRs. 9 to 7 Points Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge concerning HIEs or EHRs. 6 to 4 Points Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. Critical Analysis 25 to 21 Points Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given, and provides an assessment of each system. 20 to 16 Points Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 15 to 11 Points Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 10 to 6 Points Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. Synthesis and Evaluation 15 to 13 Points Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in HIEs or EHRs. 12 to 10 Points Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. 9 to 7 Points Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. 6 to 4 Points Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation. Sources / Examples 10 to 9 Points Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 8 to 7 Points Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 6 to 5 Points Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4 to 3 Points Source or example selections and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient. Mechanics and Writing Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. 10 to 9 Points Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment; strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8 to 7 Points Project is fairly well organized and written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment;reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6 to 5 Points Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format;inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4 to 3 Points Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format; poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. Demonstrates proper use of APA style 10 to 9 Points Project contains proper APA formatting. 8 to 7 Points Few errors in APA formatting. 6 to 5 Points Significant errors in APA formatting. 4 to 3 Points Numerous errors in APA formatting. Max Points for Content, Research, and Analysis80 Max Points for Mechanics and Writing20 Total Points Possible 100 Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10