Incorporating the Family Into Care of The Mental Health Patient Discussion

Incorporating the Family Into Care of The Mental Health Patient Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Incorporating the Family Into Care of The Mental Health Patient Discussion For this discussion, discuss the benefits and barriers to incorporating the family into care of the mental health patient. You are caring for a patient who has just been diagnosed with a mental health issue. Describe benefits and barriers that may occur when incorporating the family into caring for this patient. Incorporating the Family Into Care of The Mental Health Patient Discussion References: Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references. APA Words Limits Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page) Include introduction and conclusion Book- Kaakinen, J.R., Coehlo, D. P., Steele, R., Robinson, M. (2018). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. attachment_1 RUBRIC: DISCUSSION BOARD (30 pts) Criteria Characteristics of initial post Support for initial post Responses to Peers APA format*; Spelling/ Grammar/ Punctuation Meets Expectations 10 to 10 Points ? Provided response with rationale. ? The post is substantive and reflects careful consideration of the literature. ? Examples from the student’s practice/experience are provided to illustrate the discussion concepts. ? Addressed all required elements of the discussion prompt. ? Well organized and easy to read. 5 to 5 Points ? Cited minimum of two references: at least one (1) from required course materials to support rationale AND one (1) from peer-reviewed* references from supplemental materials or independent study on the topic to support responses. ? The initial post is a minimum of 200 words excluding references. 10 to 10 Points ? Responses to colleagues demonstrated insight and critical review of the colleagues’ posts and stimulate further discussion ? Responded to a minimum of two (2) peers and included a minimum of one (1) peer-reviewed* or course materials reference per response. ? Responses are a minimum of 100 words and are posted on different days of the discussion period by the due date. 5 to 5 Points ? APA format** is used for in-text citations and reference list. ? Posts contain grammatically correct sentences without any spelling errors. Levels of Achievement Needs Improvement 3 to 9 Points ? Provided response missing either substantive rationale, consideration of the literature, or examples from the student’s practice/experience to illustrate the discussion concepts. ? Addresses all or most of required elements. ? Somewhat organized, but may be difficult to follow. 2 to 4 Points ? Missing one (1) required course reference AND/OR one (1) peer-reviewed reference to validate response. ? Post has at least 200 words. 4 to 9 Points ? Responses to colleagues are cursory, do not stimulate further discussion and paragraph could have been more substantial. ? Responses missing one of the following: o insight/critical review of colleague’s post, o OR respond to at least two peers, o OR a peer reviewed*or course materials reference per response ? Responses are a minimum or less than 100 words and posts were on the same date as initial post. 2 to 4 Points ? APA format is missing either in-text or at end of the reference list. ? Posts contain some grammatically correct sentences with few spelling errors. Unsatisfactory 0 to 2 Points ? Provided response with minimal rationale. ? Does not demonstrate thought and provides no supporting details or examples. ? Provides a general summary of required elements. 0 to 1 Points ? Missing 1 or more of the correct type (course or peer-reviewed) or number of references to support response. ? Post is less than 200 words or there’s no post. 0 to 3 Points ? Responses to colleagues lack critical, in depth thought and do not add value to the discussion. ? Responses are missing two or more of the following: o insight/critical review of colleagues’ post o AND/OR response to at least two peers o AND/OR a peer reviewed* reference per response. ? Responses are less than 100 words, posted same day as initial post. 0 to 1 Points ? Not APA formatted OR APA format of references has errors both in-text and at end of reference list. ? Post is grammatically incorrect. NOTE: No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts. *Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. – see library tab on how to access these from database searches), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs – National Guideline Clearinghouse). All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. **Since it is difficult to edit the APA reference in the Blackboard discussion area, you can copy and paste APA references from your Word document to the Blackboard discussion area and points will not be deducted because of format changes in spacing. Last updated: 02/02/2017 © 2017 School of Nursing – Ohio University Page 1 of 1 … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10