MGT 420 Grand Canyon Week 2 Complete Work

MGT 420 Grand Canyon Week 2 Complete Work
MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Discussions Latest
Discussion Question 1
Using examples from your experience, what is the importance of planning to the practice of management?
Discussion Question 2
For your organization, or for one with which you are familiar, identify the factors that operate in its general and specific environments. How doe this understanding influence the effectiveness of an organization?
Discussion Question 3
What is the role of IT in an increasingly global environment? Provide examples of how IT has changed your organization (or an organization wit which you are familiar).
MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1
Complete the Peer Review. Grades will be prorated based on the evaluation. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Resource: Peer Evaluation
Complete this peer evaluation for each member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these evaluations will be used in determining your final grade for the assignment.
Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your teammate this score.
Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the gradebook as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.
Group member:
List names
Rating:
1 -100
Comments:
Must be completed for each team member
1. Your Name
2.
3.
4
5
6.
CATEGORY 100-93 pts (A) Excellent 92-83 pts (B) Good 82-73 pts (C) Improving
72-0 pts (D) Needs Improvement
Contributions Routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of effort. Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member who tries hard. Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the
group discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required.
Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate.
Quality of Work No correction or revision necessary,
Work work is complete and of high
quality.
Revisions and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.
Some revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the manner required.
Work provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.
Time Management All work is turned in on time or even earlier than necessary, the team member is reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate. Work is, for the most part, on time and, on a few occasions, early. For the most part, the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group member does not need to be compensated for.
Occasionally the work is on time. Rarely is it early. On one or two occasions did the rest of the group need to compensate for missing or late work.
Occasionally the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for tardiness of work assigned.
Attitude Always has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team members. Any criticism given is constructive.
Usually has a positive attitude toward the work and group, but conflict is usually minor. Any criticism is often constructive. Attitude is hit or miss toward project and group, but member is for the most part tolerable. Criticism given is, on occasion, constructive, if given at all. Rarely has a positive attitude; participation, quality of work, and time management is severely affected by such; and team member has difficulties and conflict with group.
After the total for each student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members rating him/her; calculate the following: /100 x 2% = out of 2 points for this evaluation.
MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 2
Rancho Solano Case
(Part-1)
The Rancho Solano Preparatory School case had controversy over an administrative decision that affected families. The school board decided to hire a consultant to evaluate the closure and provide expertise. Read “Rancho Solano Case.” Review the links included in Topics Materials associated with contemporary media reporting on this school issue.
The school board has hired you as a consultant to review the situation and present your findings and recommendations. Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that discusses the Rancho Solano case. Complete this assignment from the perspective of the hired consultant. Respond to the following questions:
1- What factors operating in Rancho Solano’s general and specific/internal environment affected the decision to close two campuses and consolidate resources?
2- What is your evaluation of the decision made by Dr. Mernard and Meritas? What is your evaluation of the process of going about the closure? Was RSPS demonstrating social responsibility? Discuss the closure impact on three specific stakeholders.
3- How do you think this change impacted organizational behavior within the closed campus, within the school, and among the stakeholders?
(Part-2)
At the completion of the evaluation, it is necessary to propose a potential outlook to the administrators of RSPS. The proposal needs to address possible next steps with the administration. Address the following:
1- Provide an explanation, using appropriate management theories, for how the administration could have handled the closure effectively with stakeholders? Include one theory from each of the following: the classical approach, the human relations approach, and the modern management approach.
2- You have been asked to suggest three plans: one long-term, one mid-term, and one short-term goal for the future direction of RSPS. Justify your decision for these goals.
3- Present your concluding statement.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Although an abstract is not required, an introduction and conclusion are required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.