Normative Ethical Relativism

A. Relativism Distinguish Descriptive Ethical Relativism from Normative Ethical Relativism (NER). How do people come to believe and act on normative ethical relativism (NER) ? State three objections to the theory of normative ethical relativism (NER), i.e., three criticisms or weaknesses.  How has NER been disproven? Why is NER not useful as an ethical theory? B. Ethical Traditions  For EACH of the following 5 theories below  Describe the basic principle: What is the concept of the “GOOD” involved with each? What is the major strength and three (3) weaknesses in each theory?     consequential  non-consequential A)  Ethical Egoism C)  Natural Law Theory B)  Rule Utility  D)  Kant    E)  Rawls 2. Critical Thinking What makes any act morally good?  Since no human action is seen encountered by the sense as having a label as to its moral status what is the source or how is it that actions are thought to be morally good or immoral?  This is asking you to think carefully and to think about what underlies every moral judgment people make about human conduct.  DO NOT answer with what you yourself think in particular makes a human action morally good.  Do answer with the general description of how human actions are thought to be morally good or not good, bad , incorrect or otherwise.  On what do such thoughts of moral appraisal rest? What is the basis for humans reaching a moral judgment about a human action?