Organizational Structure |Get Solution

The ability to analyze texts rhetorically will be fundamental to your success as writers and, more generally, as individuals who can engage critically with ideas and arguments. With these ends in mind, your aim in this assignment will be to 1) learn strategies for rhetorical analysis and apply them toward sources related to your project; and 2) construct an argument that both evaluates your focus texts and explains what you can gain from comparing their rhetorical features. The instructions described below are designed to guide you through this process. Getting Started: Brainstorming and Planning Select a source related to your topic that contrasts the source you wrote about in E2. Analyze this second source using the same framework you used for Exercise 2. Identify the rhetorical features that shape both articles, with a particular emphasis on what makes them distinct from one another and how they both represent larger “camps” within this debate. Draft a thesis statement that reflects your evaluation of the two sources and what can be learned by comparing them (i.e., how they “shape up” compared to one another and what such a comparison tells you about how this conversation/debate works). Composing Your Essay Academic research writing takes many forms. For this assignment, however, you will adopt a common organizational structure. Introduction (Designed to frame your paper and provide context for the type of analysis that will follow, culminating in a clear, argumentative thesis statement.) Thematic Background (Designed to build from Exercise 2. How do these articles relate to our course theme? How do they relate to your specific topic/issue and to each other? How do they help you frame and understand the conversation you’re hoping to enter into?) Rhetorical Analysis (This is where you’ll present your analysis and comparison of the sources’ rhetorical features and overall effectiveness. This section will require multiple paragraphs and make up the bulk of your essay.) Resolution (Designed to reinforce your thesis. Now that you’ve completed your analysis, what do these two sources and their approaches to this issue tell us about the how this debate works? What do these two sources reveal about how someone’s position within a larger debate shapes the rhetorical choices they make? Why should we care about how writers use rhetoric to craft these arguments? What’s at stake for people who care about this issue specifically?) Conclusion & Directions (Designed to gesture toward future action/research. What can you as an aspiring academic writer take away from comparing these two sources? What could you emulate from them? What might you avoid? What steps are next for you as a researcher and writer? Specific Requirements Your paper should: Analyze the rhetorical features and overall effectiveness of two sources related to your topic/the course theme; Develop a compelling thesis based on methodical analysis; Have a well-defined and coherent organizational structure; Be written in a clear, precise, and active prose style; Properly attribute source material to its author using a combination of signal phrases and in-text citations; Include an MLA format Works Cited page; Include a title that reflects the spirit and scope of your paper; Be 4-5 pages in length (double-spaced, one-inch margins, 12 point Times New Roman). Be submitted to Canvas as a Word document. Submissio Assigned Peer Revi Comme