Alcohol Intake Assessment

Alcohol Intake Assessment ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Alcohol Intake Assessment To complete this assignment, access the links regarding alcohol withdrawal treatments AND the CIWA(I will provide the links at the bottom). Read the case study of “Mark,” which also includes Mark’s CIWA at the bottom of the case study. Alcohol Intake Assessment Write a 750- word essay response to the following questions: What are the significant diagnostic markers (“red flags”) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark? What is the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark? Support your response. Assess the appropriate DSM diagnoses for Mark. Include at least three to five scholarly references in your paper. (I have provided some references below that may help you) Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. (USE subheadings provided by the rubric) This assignment uses a RUBRIC. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. CIWA http://adai.washington.edu/instruments/pdf/Clinical_Institute_Withdrawal_Assessment_for_Alcohol_Revised_67.pdf Non-Substance Addictive Behaviors in the Context of DSM-5 https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0306460313002633?via%3Dihub Alcohol Withdrawal Assessment Scoring Guidelines http://www.regionstrauma.org/blogs/ciwa.pdf “Alcohol Detoxification” http://www.cbhallc.com/Documents/4a-DETOX%20Guidelines.pdf Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol http://adai.washington.edu/instruments/pdf/Clinical_Institute_Withdrawal_Assessment_for_Alcohol_Revised_67.pdf attachment_1 attachment_2 Course Code PCN-605 Class Code PCN-605-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Includes a discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark 25.0% Includes the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark 25.0% Includes an assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark 20.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Intake Assessment Essay (Obj. 8.1 and 8.2) Unsatisfactory (0.00%) The paper did not include a discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark, or is not discernible to the reader. The paper did not include the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark, or the information provided is not discernible to the reader. The paper did not include an assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark, or the information provided is not discernible to the reader. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Alcohol Intake Assessment Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is complete and accurate. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for mark is complete and accurate. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is complete and accurate. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is thorough and well-reasoned. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark is thorough and well-reasoned. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is thorough and well-reasoned. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Alcohol Intake Assessment Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Comments All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Course Code PCN-605 Class Code PCN-605-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Includes a discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark 25.0% Includes the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark 25.0% Includes an assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark 20.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Intake Assessment Essay (Obj. 8.1 and 8.2) Unsatisfactory (0.00%) The paper did not include a discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark, or is not discernible to the reader. The paper did not include the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark, or the information provided is not discernible to the reader. The paper did not include an assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark, or the information provided is not discernible to the reader. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis for Mark is incomplete or contains some flaws, though the content provided is generally accurate. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Alcohol Intake Assessment Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is complete and accurate. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for mark is complete and accurate. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is complete and accurate. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is thorough and well-reasoned. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark is thorough and well-reasoned. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is thorough and well-reasoned. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) The discussion about the significant diagnostic markers (‘red flags’) that indicate acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome for Mark is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. The discussion about the most appropriate/safest course of action for Mark is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. The discussion about the assessment of the appropriate DSM diagnosis is complete, accurate, well-reasoned, and fully supported. Student illustrates an advanced understanding. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Comments All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10