Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication
Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Ive attached two documents to this post which you must follow, as instructional guides. It will show to be helpful. One has APA instructions for the 7th edition APA style. The other has instructions for the paper. (Please avoid overly referencing in text citations, overly spacing lines and adding a lot of subheadings). Please make this paper look professional. Thank you. Journal 1 Instructions The student will compose a brief essay comparing and contrasting scientific communication, including the role science plays in contemporary society (DSL 200.1), distinguishing between science and pseudoscience, and identifying when science is misrepresented in the media (DSL 200.3). The scientific data must be from reputable source(s) and must be accurately interpreted and cited (DSL 200.4). Additional reliable sources may be referred to, as needed or required.Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication The first source listed at the bottom is a news article discussing the primary study listed below it. Students should read both sources thoroughly to achieve a good understanding of what the primary source says, and then be able to evaluate how the information is communicated to the lay public in the news article. Students should look for any inaccuracies, omissions, or misrepresentations in the news article and point them out with specific evidence. Students may also comment on how well the news article communicates the information citing any specific examples as supporting evidence. Students should cover the background problems or observations investigated by the study in the introductory paragraph. Students should state the hypothesis according to the primary source (scientific study) and then explain how well that hypothesis is communicated by the news article. Students should further address how the news article describes key results, conclusions, and how the information should be applied in the larger context of the problems/observations previously stated.University of Miami Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Essay ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS Wherever possible, students should use the concepts described in the Communications Module on how proper scientific reporting should be conducted. Try to focus on examples of good scientific reporting illustrated while pointing out any areas of poor scientific reporting that deserve appropriate criticism. Evaluation The journal includes the following processes and requirements: Start with an engaging attention getter, and introduce the topic of the paper by identifying the scientific observations/problems addressed by the media communication and in the scientific communication; Identify the media communication as a media communication/secondary source and the scientific communication as a scientific communication/primary source Write a valid hypothesis statement which is addressed by the research in the scientific article and explain if the hypothesis is presented correctly in the media source; Compare and contrast additional parts to the scientific method including research methods, results, and research conclusions comparing what is stated in the media source and the scientific source; Effectively evaluate any data tables/charts needed to discuss this study properly, accurately describing what is communicated by that data; End the journal definitively, summarizing key points made in the paper; Use paraphrased information, examples, and evidence to support all points. Do not forget to cite paraphrased information with appropriate APA style citations in-text; Properly organize information within and between paragraphs, including proper transitions and a clear flow of content in the paper; Format layout, citations, and references in correct APA style (11 point font); The final submission should be roughly between 3-5 pages double spaced (not including title and reference pages) while covering all parts of the grading rubric listed below. journal_1__help_.docx student_apa_p Please write a compare and contrast essay, comparing the validity of the Buzz Feed article to the original study The paper must be at least 3 pages long of writing (instructions highlighted in yellow) Follow the instructions as documented below Use APA formatting and references (also APA in text citation) The separate document which I posted with the question shows an example of the 7th addition APA formatting and referencing https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/13625187.2016.1154143?scroll=top&needAccess=true https://www.buzzfeed.com/kellyoakes/contraceptive-app?utm_term=.sl4KEEMzY#.ls5Y66Ld0 Journal 1 Instructions The student will compose a brief essay comparing and contrasting scientific communication, including the role science plays in contemporary society (DSL 200.1), distinguishing between science and pseudoscience, and identifying when science is misrepresented in the media (DSL 200.3). The scientific data must be from reputable source(s) and must be accurately interpreted and cited (DSL 200.4). Additional reliable sources may be referred to, as needed or required. The first source listed at the bottom is a news article discussing the primary study listed below it. Students should read both sources thoroughly to achieve a good understanding of what the primary source says, and then be able to evaluate how the information is communicated to the lay public in the news article. Students should look for any inaccuracies, omissions, or misrepresentations in the news article and point them out with specific evidence. Students may also comment on how well the news article communicates the information citing any specific examples as supporting evidence.University of Miami Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Essay. Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Students should cover the background problems or observations investigated by the study in the introductory paragraph. Students should state the hypothesis according to the primary source (scientific study) and then explain how well that hypothesis is communicated by the news article. Students should further address how the news article describes key results, conclusions, and how the information should be applied in the larger context of the problems/observations previously stated. Wherever possible, students should use the concepts described in the Communications Module on how proper scientific reporting should be conducted. Try to focus on examples of good scientific reporting illustrated while pointing out any areas of poor scientific reporting that deserve appropriate criticism. Evaluation The journal includes the following processes and requirements: Start with an engaging attention getter, and introduce the topic of the paper by identifying the scientific observations/problems addressed by the media communication and in the scientific communication; Identify the media communication as a media communication/secondary source and the scientific communication as a scientific communication/primary source Write a valid hypothesis statement which is addressed by the research in the scientific article and explain if the hypothesis is presented correctly in the media source; Compare and contrast additional parts to the scientific method including research methods, results, and research conclusions comparing what is stated in the media source and the scientific source; Effectively evaluate any data tables/charts needed to discuss this study properly, accurately describing what is communicated by that data; End the journal definitively, summarizing key points made in the paper; Use paraphrased information, examples, and evidence to support all points. Do not forget to cite paraphrased information with appropriate APA style citations in-text; Properly organize information within and between paragraphs, including proper transitions and a clear flow of content in the paper; Format layout, citations, and references in correct APA style (11 point font); The final submission should be roughly between 3-5 pages double spaced (not including title and reference pages) while covering all parts of the grading rubric listed below. ***Very important, please use the authors last name when discussing their work. DO NOT refer to the articles by publication or by number. News Article https://www.buzzfeed.com/kellyoakes/contraceptiveapp?utm_term=.sl4KEEMzY#.ls5Y66Ld0 (Links to an external site.) University of Miami Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Essay. Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Original Study Link 1 Title of Paper: Subtitle (if any) Name Department, (University name) Course Number: Course Name Instructor Assignment Due Date 2 Title of Paper: Subtitle (if any) Even though it seems redundant, APA style formally wants you to add your title again as you start the body of your paper (see above). Generally, your paper should begin with an introduction. Note that everything should be double-spaced throughout the entire paper. Second, margins are 1-inch wide on all sides. The font should be Calibri 11 point. Every paragraph should be indented ½ inch. Remember to cite your sources throughout the body of the paper. Articles and books are cited the same way in the text, yet they appear different on the References page. For example, an article by Cronbach and Meehl (1955) and a book by Bandura (1986) are written with the authors names and the year of the publication in parentheses. However, if you look on the References page they look a little different. Remember that APA style does not use footnotes or anything like that for citations. Two other things about citations are important. When a citation is written inside parentheses: (Cronbach & Meehl, 1959), an ampersand (&) is used between authors names instead of the word and. Second, when citing an authors work using quotations, be sure to include a page number. For example, Rogers (1961) once wrote that two important elements of a helping relationship are genuineness and transparency (p. 37). Notice that the page number is included here. References at the end of the paper should be in alphabetical order, double-spaced, with a hanging indent of ½, as formatted below. 3 References Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. doi:10.1037/h0040957 Crowne, C. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354. doi:10.1037/h0047358 Euromonitor International. (2008, May 27). Shopping for pleasure: The development of shopping as a leisure pursuit. https://euromonitor.com/ Johansson, J. K. (2009). Global marketing: Foreign entry, local marketing, and global management (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Neh, H. (2016, April). The aesthetics of survival [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/hari_nef_the_aesthetics_of_survival Polites, H. (2014, February 13). Australias economy is not all doom and gloom: Here are five surprising growth sectors. Business Spectator. Retrieved from http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/2/12/economy/australias-economy-not-alldoom-and-gloom-here-are-five-surprising-growth Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Houghton Mifflin. The World Bank. (2020). Projects in Mail Project list. https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projectsoperations/projects-list?countrycode_exact=ML University of Miami Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Essay. Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10
RECOMMENDED: University of Miami Analysis of Scientific Reporting in Media Communication Essay
With us, you are either satisfied 100% or you get your money back-No monkey business