Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics NURS 6003

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics NURS 6003
Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to quickly erode…or worse.
Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignments asks you to consider these and how you might apply them to your own work.
In this Assignment, you will add to the original document you started in the previous assignment to continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.
To Get Ready:
Consider the strategies presented in this week’s Resources to support academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
Consider the relationship between and professional integrity.
The task at hand:
Section 1 of Part 3: Writing Sample: The Relationship Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:
Explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing in great detail.
Explains in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics in a clear and accurate manner.
Cite at least two resources that fully support your arguments, using proper APA formatting.
To improve the product, use Grammarly and SafeAssign.
y
Describe in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing help to maintain academic integrity. Include proof that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve responses.
Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Work Integrity
Extend on your ideas from Section 1 by:
Clearly identifying and accurately describing the strategies you intend to pursue to maintain the integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work as an MSN student and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career.
Include a well-developed review of the resources and approaches you intend to employ as a student and professional.
Add your work for this Assignment to the document you started in Week 1 Assignment, which was based on the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
By Day 7
Submit both Section 1 and Section 2 of Part 3.
Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a conclusion paragraph.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics NURS 6003
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment
Next Week
To go to the next week:
Week 4
Week 4: Scholarship and Nursing Practice
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze research databases for identifying peer-reviewed articles (D)
Analyze peer-reviewed research (A)
Justify the use of peer-reviewed research in professional practice (A)
Analyze strategies for finding peer-reviewed research (D, A)
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942
Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesizing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)
Document: Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Professional encompasses activities that adhere to ethical and professional standards in nursing practices. In contrast, academic integrity incorporates five basic essential values, including justice, honesty, trust, and respect, as well as responsibility for all academic efforts. In both nursing education and the nursing profession, educational and professional integrity must be maintained at all times in order to ensure effective practices. Academic integrity is typically observed at all levels of the learning process, including conversation, and exams. Students or students are constantly expected to maintain the uniqueness of their work and prevent plagiarism. Additionally, before submitting tasks, it is usually necessary to confirm proper grammar. Plagiarism is considered a grave violation in the writing process. In the majority of cases, students who plagiarize without attribution are subject to disciplinary measures such as course failure and suspension. Various areas of human life are governed by moral and ethical standards in the workplace. Existing social, ethical, and moral standards significantly facilitate persons’ ability to coexist and live in harmony. is frequently the starting point for a high level of professionalism. Learners are trained to maintain a high level of integrity during their time in nursing school and other colleges; through ongoing learning procedures, they become familiar with the majority of professional practice requirements. The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship between academic and professional integrity.
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began, write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following:
· Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
· Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
· Cite at least 2 resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
· Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.
· Explain how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response accurately cites at least two resources that fully support the arguments explained.
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response partially describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response partially describes the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response partially cites at least two resources that partially support the arguments explained.
The response partially describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including some evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response vaguely describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
The response vaguely describesthe relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
The response vaguely or inaccurately cites at least two resources that vaguely support the arguments explained.
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including vague evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response describing the relationship between academic integrity and writing is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response describing the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response inaccurately cites at least two resources that inaccurately support the arguments explained, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including no evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.
Part 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by:
· Identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes in detail resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
The response partially identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response partially reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.
The response inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric