Assignment: Complete a review of literature

Assignment: Complete a review of literature ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Assignment: Complete a review of literature I don’t know how to handle this Health & Medical question and need guidance. Assignment: Complete a review of literature Complete a review of literature and select a minimum of 3 articles that are appropriate research articles related to your question. Critique each of the articles using the guide in Appendix F. (Download the pdf from the companion website for the text and save it to your computer. Or it is attached below for your convenience. When you open the pdf, you will be able to enter text in the lines and check boxes). Appraisal C Integrative Review(2).docx Appraisal E Qualitative Review(2).docx Appraisal F Quanitative Review.docx RUBRIC: Rubric for Appen Rubric for Appendix C E and F Completely filled out (All yes/no questions) including Citation, Comments, and open ended questions 100 points. Completely filled out (All yes/no questions) excluding Citation, Comments, and open ended questions 80 points These are the only points to be awarded for this assignment. Partially filled out yes/no questions and only one or two of the written comments/questions filled in will receive a 0. So you can chose to make 100, 80, or 0. dix C E F.docx appraisal_c_integrative_review_2___1_.docx appraisal_e_qualitative_review_2___1_.docx appraisal_f_quanitative_review_1___1_.docx A P P E N D I X C Appraisal Guide: Conclusions of an Integrative Research Review Citation: Synopsis How many persons were involved in conducting the review? What topic or question did the integrative research review address? How were potential research reports identified? What determined if a study was included in the analysis? How many studies were included in the review? What research designs were used in the studies? What were the consistent and important across-studies conclusions? 405 Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company 406 APPENDIX C Appraisal Guide Credibility Was the topic clearly defined? q Yes q No q Not clear Was the search for studies and other evidence comprehensive and unbiased? q Yes q No q Not clear Was the screening of citations for inclusion based on explicit criteria? q Yes q No q Not clear *Were the included studies assessed for quality? q Yes q No q Not clear Were the design characteristics and findings of the included studies displayed or discussed in sufficient detail? q Yes q No q Not clear *Was there a true integration (i.e., synthesis) of the findings—not merely reporting of findings from each study individually? q Yes q No q Not clear *Did the reviewers explore why differences in findings might have occurred? q Yes q No q Not clear Did the reviewers distinguish between conclusions based on consistent findings from several good studies and those based on inferior evidence (number or quality)? q Yes q No q Not clear Which conclusions were supported by consistent findings from two or more good or high-quality studies? List ARE thE CoNCluSIoNS CREDIblE? q All q Some q No Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Conclusions of an Integrative Research Review 407 Clinical Significance *Across studies, is the size of the treatment or the strength of the association found or the meaningfulness of qualitative findings strong enough to make a difference in patient outcomes or experiences of care? Assignment: Complete a review of literature q Yes q No Are the conclusions relevant to the care the nurse gives? q Yes q No q Not clear ARE thE CoNCluSIoNS ClINICAlly SIGNIfICANt? q All q Some q No q Not clear Applicability Does the IRR address a problem, situation, or decision we are addressing in our setting? q Yes q No q Not clear Are the patients in the studies similar to those we see, either overall or in a subgroup of patients? q Yes q No q Not clear What changes, additions, training, or purchases would be needed to implement and sustain a clinical protocol based on these conclusions? Specify Is what we will have to do to implement the new protocol realistically achievable by us (resources, capability, commitment)? q Yes q No q Not clear Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company 408 APPENDIX C Appraisal Guide How will we know if our patients are benefiting from our new protocol? Specify ShoulD wE PRoCEED to DESIGN A PRotoCol INCoRPoRAtING thESE CoNCluSIoNS? q All q Some q No * Important criteria Comments Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company A P P E N D I X E Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Qualitative Study Citation: Synopsis What experience, situation, or subculture does the researcher want to understand? Does the researcher want to produce a description of an experience, a social process, or an event, or is the goal to generate a theory? How was data collected? How did the researcher control his or her biases and preconceptions? Are specific pieces of data (e.g., direct quotes) and more generalized statements (themes, theories) included in the report? What are the main findings of the study? 415 Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company 416 APPENDIX E Appraisal Guide Credibility Is the study published in a source that required peer review? q Yes q No q Not clear Were the methods used appropriate to the study purpose? q Yes q No q Not clear Was the sampling of observations or interviews appropriate and varied enough to serve the purpose of the study? q Yes q No q Not clear *Were data collection methods effective in obtaining in-depth data? q Yes q No q Not clear Did the data collection methods avoid the possibility of oversight, underrepresentation, or overrepresentation from certain types of sources? q Yes q No q Not clear Were data collection and analysis intermingled in a dynamic way? q Yes q No q Not clear *Is the data presented in ways that provide a vivid portrayal of what was experience or happened and its context? q Yes q No q Not clear *Does the data provided justify generalized statements, themes, or theory? q Yes q No q Not clear ArE thE FINDINGS CrEDIblE? q All q Some q No Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Findings of a Qualitative Study 417 Clinical Significance *Are the findings rich and informative? *Is the perspective provided potentially useful in providing insight, support, or guidance for assessing patient status or progress? q Yes q No q Not clear q Yes q No q All q Some q Not clear q No * = Assignment: Complete a review of literature Important criteria Comments Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company A P P E N D I X Citation: Synopsis What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)? How was the sample obtained? What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used? Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data (demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)? What methods were used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)? Yes No 1. How was the sample size determined? 2. Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups? What are the main findings? 419 Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company 420 APPENDIX F Appraisal Guide Credibility Is the study published in a source that required peer review? q Yes q No q Not clear Was the design used appropriate to the research question? q Yes q No q Not clear *Did the data obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question? q Yes q No q Not clear Were the measuring instruments reliable and valid? q Yes q No q Not clear *Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled? q Yes q No q Not clear *Was the study free of extraneous variables introduced by how, when, and where the study was done? q Yes q No q Not clear *If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions: q Yes q No q Not clear 1. Were participants randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the intervention)? q Yes q No q Not clear 2. Were the interventions well defined and consistently delivered? q Yes q No q Not clear 3. Assignment: Complete a review of literature Were the groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions? q Yes q No q Not clear 4. If no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a difference if one existed? q Yes q No q Not clear 5. If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the intervention? q Yes q No q Not clear Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies? q Yes q No q Not clear ArE thE FINDINGS CrEDIblE? q All q Some q No Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Findings of a Quantitative Study 421 Clinical Significance Note any difference in means, r2s, or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR) *Is the target population clearly described? q Yes q No q Not clear *Is the frequency, association, or treatment effect impressive enough for you to be confident that the finding would make a clinical difference if used as the basis for care? q Yes q No q Not clear ArE thE FINDINGS ClINICAlly SIGNIFICANt? q All q Some q No * = Important criteria Comments Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Copyright © 2018 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10