Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies

NURS 6053 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
Leadership Week 7 Initial Post
Results of the Clark Health Workplace Inventory concluded that the organization I am employed with is a moderately healthy workplace (Clark, 2015). I am surprised that the results fell in the category they did, I expected a lower score. The reasoning behind the score I expected was because of the current pandemic. Employees are leaving for higher paying jobs and many have been unhappy with the stress caused by the pandemic. However, the employees of the organization share the same vision to improve the lives of the community and we have leaders that are open to listening to our concerns, maintaining a civil work environment. I was also surprised by the emphasis by the assessment regarding employee self-care and teamwork. Even during the pandemic, our organization as encouraged self-care giving quiet rooms with massage chairs and our manager has been available even on weekends and late at night to ensure the unit’s needs are being met. During the stress and chaos of the pandemic, I moved to the intensive care unit. I was met by a unit that was constantly full of high acuity patients than normal even for the ICU. However, I found that the team worked well together and communicated effectively presenting a work environment that was civil and healthy and I am proud to be apart of .
The main idea that I had regarding the results was that the organization runs smoothly because of the shared mission, values and goals of the organization. Christus Good Shepherd’s mission is to extend the healing ministry of Jesus Christ with core values of dignity, integrity, excellence, compassion, and stewardship. The vision of Christus Health is to be a leader and advocate in the creation of innovative health and wellness solutions to improve the lives of the individuals of the community so that all may experience the healing love of Jesus Christ (Christus Health, 2021). However, as shown by the results of the assessment not falling in the top category, the current pandemic has put a strain on certain aspects including competitive pay and tension in everyday work.
One instance where I have felt that I had an uncivil encounter was when I was in the ICU and one of the physicians started yelling orders at me during a stressful situation and griping in front of the patient that it was late in the day to be inserting lines and such. Clark (2015) states that the most effective way to stop incivility is to address it when it occurs. However, this takes practice and requires effective communication and competent dialogue. At the time, I was unable to address the physician outside of the patient’s room, however I have a wonderful team that did address it with the doctor. The team member gently spoke with the physician in the appropriate environment and reminded him that we are all exhausted, but that appropriate communication is essential to decrease work stress between staff and provide safe and effective patient care. Working under conditions of civil communication, promotes role performance of team members (Liu, et. al., 2020). Even under stressful working conditions, it is important for each team member to promote a civil working environment to support optimum work performance of each team member.
References
Christus Health (2021). Christus Health: Our vision, mission, and values. Retrieved from https://www.christushealth.org/about/our-
mission-values-and-vision
Clark, C.M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved
from .
Liu, Y., Vashdi, D. R., Cross, T., Bamberger, P., & Erez, A. (2020). Exploring the puzzle of civility: Whether and when team civil
communication influences team members’ role performance. Human Relations, 73(2), 215–241. https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/0018726719830164
Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
Many of us can think of leaders we have come to admire, be they historical figures, pillars of the industry we work in, or leaders we know personally. The leadership of individuals such as Abraham Lincoln and Margaret Thatcher has been studied and discussed repeatedly. However, you may have interacted with leaders you feel demonstrated equally competent leadership without ever having a book written about their approaches.
What makes great leaders great? Every leader is different, of course, but one area of commonality is the leadership philosophy that great leaders develop and practice. A
NURS 6053 Assignment Personal Leadership Philosophies Sl
leadership philosophy is basically an attitude held by leaders that acts as a guiding principle for their behavior. While formal theories on leadership continue to evolve over time, great leaders seem to adhere to an overarching philosophy that steers their actions.
What is your leadership philosophy? In this Assignment, you will explore what guides your own leadership.
To Prepare:
Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
Reflect on your results of the CliftonStrengths Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.
Download your Signature Theme Report to submit for this Assignment.
The Assignment (2-3 pages):
Personal Leadership Philosophies
Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:
A description of your core values.
A personal mission/vision statement.
An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.
A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
Be sure to incorporate your colleagues’ feedback on your CliftonStrengths Assessment from this Module’s Discussion 2.
Note: Be sure to attach your Signature Theme Report to your Assignment submission.
By Day 7 of Week 6
Submit your personal leadership philosophy.
attachment
Post.docx
attachment
samplepersonalphilosophy.doc
Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:
· A description of your core values.
· A personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail a set of core values.
The response accurately and completely describes in detail a personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response describes a set of core values.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response describes a set of core values that is vague or inaccurate.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague or inaccurate.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response describes a set of core values that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response describes a personal mission/vision statement that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile.
· A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and completely provides an analysis and detailed summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment.
The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail two key behaviors to strengthen.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague or inaccurate.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response provides an analysis and summary of the CliftonStrengths Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The response describes two key behaviors to strengthen that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
· A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
Points Range: 50 (50%) – 55 (55%)
An accurate, complete, and detailed development plan is provided that thoroughly explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail plans on how to achieve a personal vision with specific and accurate examples.
The response includes a comprehensive synthesis of information gleaned from sources that fully support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources to fully support the responses provided.
Points Range: 44 (44%) – 49 (49%)
An accurate development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some specific examples.
The response includes a synthesis of information gleaned from sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision. Integrates 1 credible outside source, in addition to 2 or 3 course-specific resources which may support the responses provided.
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 43 (43%)
A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision and may include some examples that are vague or inaccurate.
The response includes information gleaned from 2 or 3 sources that may support how to achieve a personal vision.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 38 (38%)
A development plan is provided that explains plans to improve upon the two key behaviors selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain plans on how to achieve a personal vision that is vague and inaccurate, does not include any examples, or is missing.
The response does not include any additional information gleaned from outside sources, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric