Applied Sciences

Please follow the instruction below for a one full paper homework report. Have you ever seen an artwork that changed your mood? Have you felt positive or negative reaction to an artwork- then your perspective towards it changed over time or as you learned more about it? Tell me about any such experience you have had. Describe the artwork and name the work and/or the artist you are discussing, if you can

Part 1: Chapter Response: After each chapter reading assignment students will write a response (one-two paragraphs). Responses will be about the content, points that you may have resonated with or if it prompted a memory of a personal experience.  Then, one paragraph talking about these three short videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lh_6oznbKgg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR9-DI9jnQo&t=79 https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/03/02/art-therapy-for-cancer-survivors.cnn Watch each short video and write about it with the Chapter 8 response. There should be a total of 2-3 paragraphs now. Each student must submit one question with their responses regarding the chapter (after the first parts are done). You are expected to think critically. NO extra sources or citations required. ONLY refer to the pages that I will attach which come from the textbook, Chapter 8; AND the three short videos I am attaching. I’ll attach an example of a past chapter response for reference as well.

Why did Gericault choose this moment to depict and not another? How does the composition reinforce his message? Why is this a quintessential Romantic painting?  This essay is due tomorrow morning at 9 am.   The painting is called Raft of the Medusa. If you could could you please put it in somewhat simpler writing.

Write an essay on why people feared comets in the past. Describe how they tried to protect themselves from the danger they thought was coming. NO COPIED  AND PLEASE FREE FROM PLAGIARIM

These three questions are supposed to be three different essay topics. therefore three small essays each about a little more than a page. Question 1 (worth 5 points):  Write a thoughtful, well-organized essay on representations of men and women in The Godfather. Is hegemonic patriarchy displayed in the film? Begin your essay with an explanation (always in your own words) of what hegemonic patriarchy is, followed by your statement that indicates whether you believe it was displayed in The Godfather or not. The remainder of your essay should be three-five paragraphs examining specific ways (characters actions, appearance, etc.; narrative/plot arc(s), mise-en-scene, etc.) that the film displays or doesn’t display hegemonic patriarchy.   Question 2 (5 points): Using correct terminology, discuss and analyze the editing theories and concepts in this CLIP from Battleship Potemkin (Eisenstein, 1925). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj30JW_O3tQ&feature=youtu.be Question 3 (5 points): Describe the mise-en-scene in either this shot from The Godfather or this shot from School Daze. These are both long takes, so make sure your essay is organized. (clip of school daze begins at 5:45) (clip of godfather begins at 1:35:30) Thank you

a.     First, define, compare and contrast “physical reality”, “symbolic reality” and” mediated reality”.  Then, explain the role that mediated reality occupies in human communication in general and global mass media in particular.  b.     Read both of the following articles: “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality,” Ernest Bormann Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58 (1972), 396-407. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335637209383138   “Homo Narrans The Narrative Paradigm: In the Beginning” Walter R Fisher Journal of Communication (pre-1986); Fall 1985; 35, 4; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02974.x   Summarize each of the two articles and then identify two main points in each article which you find relevant for the study of global mass media in general.    Next discuss the impact of “fantasy” and “narrative” in the construction of a “transactional approach to imagining the global.”  Finally, thoughtfully relate what you’ve learned from the two articles to the following passage:   “So much of the way that people… operate, whatever culture they’re from, is through stories. It’s the way that people imagine their world and how they see things. Stories are always the backdrop. The kind of assumed things that are unspoken, find their way in the stories. And so when you see a story that comes from a different place, you . . . you run up against different assumptions. And that’s always kind of exciting.” (Darling-Wolf, p. 124).

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE Contributing productively to a conversation—academic or otherwise—means first looking to see what others in the conversation have said and developing something worthwhile to contribute; in these regards, you’ve mostly done your homework (figuratively and literally). But making your case successfully requires more than simply writing whatever pops into your head.   REVIEW  Earlier in the semester, we read Chapter 2: Rhetorical Analysis in Critical Reading, Critical Writing: A Handbook to Understanding College Composition. Back then, the point was to learn to read texts in context—to comprehend not only the words on the page but also the circumstances in which the text was produced, including the context it was written in, the audience it was written for, and the writer’s purpose in relation to that audience. This time around, we will revisit thinking rhetorically (thinking in terms of audience, purpose, and context), though with the intention of better understanding the rhetorical situation of your own project so that you might craft your essay to give it the best possible chance of success. If necessary to refresh your memory, review/reread Chapter 2  (Links to an external site.)  in Critical Reading, Critical Writing: A Handbook to Understanding College Composition. WATCH Watch the video, “What is Rhetoric”  (Links to an external site.) ; some of it will be review from the first unit, but most of it will help you in the next step below.  WRITE Write a 1-2-page reflection in which you break down your rhetorical situation accordingly: The context of your project: What various disciplines do the researchers writing about your topic publish their work in? What are the aims of those disciplines, and what issues, challenges, or controversies are those disciplines contending with? Which journals were your sources published in, and what are the particular interests of those journals? More broadly, what relevant issues, challenges, or controversies are taking place in the world outside of the scholarly communities you’ve invested? Your audience: Whom among the scholarly communities you mentioned above do you hope to reach with your project? What matters to them, and what do they currently know, think, or believe about your topic? Your purpose: What would you like the audience you identified for the bullet above to think, feel, or do about your topic as a result of reading your essay? What claim will you be making that they might potentially disagree with, and what competing claims will you have to contend with? Your strategy: In what ways might your audience object to your claim, and how might you address those objections? In what ways might you best appeal to your readers to persuade them of your claim? How might you best connect your claim with what matters to your audience? Where is the strength of your argument, and how might you emphasize that strength through the framing and execution of your essay? What kinds of appeals would your audience most likely find persuasive and how might you craft your essay to best meet their expecations? Requirements: Word doc, double spaced, 12pt font

What is your favorite two-dimensional art work? Describe and explain why? Include artist, title, medium and dates.

Landscape and Class John Barrell and T.J. Clark are remarkably aligned scholars of social class and the history of art. For both, their main focus is the representation of socio-economic difference in the 19th century—a time where there was a profound growth and transformation in urban centers, and agrarianism was giving way to industrialism. While aligned, Barrell and Clark focus on different contexts—Britain and France—and examine artists/artworks with incredibly divergent politics (i.e. the differences in the landed nobility of England and Courbet’s Bohemianism). Drawing from one example of the English landscape in Barrell and one work by Courbet as discussed by Clark, this essay asks you to compare and contrast how these artists depict landscape as a social history. You will need to draw from Barrell and Clark’s essays as evidence to prove your point (and I will be looking heavily at your ability to apply their readings to artworks). Please be sure to clearly describe your thesis, and to write in clear, descriptive and well-organized sentences.   Formatting: -Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double spaced, 1” margins, 2 pgs.  -Endnotes formatted in Chicago Style (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/chicago_manual_17th_edition/chicago_style_introduction.html) -Submit essay in e-learning Dropbox. Rating Scale: Structure and Argument (25 points) How well does the student set out the key issues and ideas in the artworks/readings? Does the student have a clearly written thesis statement? Does the conclusion clearly express the student’s judgment as an independent viewpoint?             (no)     1          2          3          4          5          (yes) Knowledge and Understanding (35 points) How well a student describes and analyzes relevant and important issues and concepts  within the social history of landscape. Can the student apply the readings to artworks?  Are quotations placed into context? Is material handled accurately/factually.              (no)     1          2          3          4          5          (yes) Use of Sources (20 points) How accurately and critically the student uses sources from Barrell and Clark. Does the   student use sources to make illuminating connections? Do they provide contextual  analysis of their sources, or merely quote them? Are citations accurately cited as endnotes in Chicago?             (no)     1          2          3          4          5          (yes) Style and Presentation (20 points) Does the student use grammar, punctuation, and syntax properly? Is the essay well-written, organized and clear to read?             (no)     1          2          3          4          5          (yes)

The internet contains a plethora of resources for studying modern art, it’s history, and the importance of analyzing the various styles, techniques and traditions represented by modern art and architecture. This course contains four internet resource activities that will allow you to compare varied forms of visual experiences, discuss specific styles within a historical context as well as evaluate the art forms according to their form, content, and technique. Each activity’s goal/purpose is slightly different from the next; however, each will allow you to put into practice the analysis of modern art. For each activity, you will be provided with several videos and websites that you must view in order to complete the assignment. These resources are provided to you in the Reading & Study folder of the previous and current module in which the activity is due. Once you’ve completed all the items in the Reading & Study folder you will answer the questions provided below. These questions must be answered in complete sentences in a Word document. There is not a required word count but your answers must be substantial and provide details and examples to the questions presented. An ideal response would be a minimum of 75 words long. References are not required; however, if you do cite a source you must use APA formatting. Internet Resource  Activity 1: This activity encourages you to explore the fine artworks that are in your own community. Experiencing art in person changes the way it is interpreted and gives the viewer better insight to the meaning of the work. To begin, access and complete the internet resources in the Modules/Weeks 1 and 2 Reading & Study folders.  Next, answer the following questions based on your reading and viewing of internet resources:  1. What was the driving force for Eugene Delacroix and Theodore Gericault’s paintings? Give at least one example for each artist.  2. Name at least two museums who have paintings by members of the Hudson River School. Make sure to include the Museum name and location along with the artist and title of the painting for each. Have you had a chance to visit either museum in person or online? If so, what were your thoughts on the paintings? How do they relate with the material you’ve learned about this week? Please complete the following Module/Week 2 textbook reading assignments: Art History Volume II Chapter 30 Art in Spain and Spanish America Early Nineteenth-Century Art: Neoclassicism and Romanticism Gothic and Neoclassical Styles in Early Nineteenth-Century Architecture