Creative Writing

Description of how the Grade 5 Science Pupils’ Book deals with scientific topics in connection with the national curriculum. Particular references and linking to the NCF (Primary) are expected for this part.( Describe how the science curriculum for Grade 5 is enacted (developed) in the textbook. Is it just teaching by telling, learning by doing (activity-based, inquiry, etc.), or are the topics developed in some other ways? (275 words) 2. Critical reflection on how the suggested activities in the textbook allow for an inquiry-based approach. You can discuss, among other things, the instructions imparted to pupils such as questioning, writing, and steps to be carried out. Here it is a critical reflection.( This part comprises a reflection and critical thinking. Pay attention to the keywords (in red) in the question as the most important element in your answer is to be RELEVANT – you have to answer the question posed.(( 275 words) 3 Critical reflection on the effectiveness of the activities in the pupil’s book. (Here it is a critical reflection. Reflect critically on how the activities as developed in the textbook are effective in making pupils learning of science effectively and meaningful.) (275 words)

PAPER 2 You’ll want to edit your current draft and add new material. Paper 2 is a creative piece, so the revision will depend on what you wrote. Editing: • If I made suggestions for adding/changing material, consider them. You don’t have to change stuff because I suggested it. Adding new material You’ve got a few options. Choose any/all of these, or a combination: • Where do you want your story to go next? What do you think was happening to your characters before the story began? If you want, you can add a short “sequel” at the end, or a “prequel” at the beginning. • Add elements of a new genre. For example: If you wrote a western for paper 2, can you revise it to add some horror elements, or noir fiction elements? • Expand your explanation. You wrote about 400 words of explanation at the end of paper 2, to tell me about your writing process. Be sure to expand of update this. All together, you should add about 500 words (more is fine). That’s about a page’s worth of new material. The same criteria from paper 2 apply. Be sure you’re clearly using genre details. If you quote someone else’s words, be sure to cite them.

* Grand Challenges in Social Work – https://grandchallengesforsocialwork.org/ (Links to an external site.) In the professional field of Social Work, there are identified Grand Challenges. (2C – You could utilize this website to explore power differentials within and between groups, 5A – You could utilize this website to identify a macro level issue related to human rights and social and economic justice) https://grandchallengesforsocialwork.org/

For our final discussion forum, let’s discuss Acocella’s article, “Once Upon A Time: The Lure of the Fairy Tale,” which tries to address the “big” question of the purpose or role of fairy tales in our lives. Of the perspectives on the role of fairy tales presented in the article, who do you agree with overall? Why? Point to specifics and use quotations. Draw on your own familiarity with the stories to enhance your response.

Discuss how one’s socioeconomic status influences choice in the living environment in terms of access to quality food/water, exposure to toxic chemicals, etc. Consider the role that structural bias and racism can play in both living environment and environmental exposure.

personal narrative essay should focus on feelings memories and experiences of the author use double spaces standard one inch margins equivalent times new Roman 12 final draft should be between 750-2500 words

Choose a current issue that you’re interested in and examine two sources related to that issue. After choosing an issue, perform a search on the topic and choose two different sources that talk about that topic (articles, blogs, partisan sources, news articles, etc.). Then, investigate each of the sources and take note of their key features. Finally, explain which source is more reliable/credible and explain why. Make sure to justify your comparison between the two sources, explaining why one is reliable/credible and why the other is not as reliable/credible. Justify your conclusion with specific reasons and evidence. Provide a link to your sources and use this week’s resources to support your discussion. Part 1 is worth up to fifty points and should be a minimum of 300 words.