Education

For Blog Post 3 you will be discussing online teaching tools. For all blog posts, you should focus on what you’re learning from the readings and from the lecture. (I have uploaded the readings, you just need to choose some chapters to read and noted which chapter from which book you read on the references page) for the blog post, just focus on the new ideas, new tools, and interesting examples that you are pulling from the readings. Around 500 words For Blog Post 3, focus on the following questions: What new tools did you learn about? (include links) What strategies did you learn about for using these tools? What ideas were new to you, or what new thoughts/connections did you have when exploring these new tools?Did anything surprise you in the readings? Do you have any pushbacks, critiques, or disagreements with what you read?  For more information on Teaching Tools read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_method

The purpose of this visual is to inform people, plastic pollution could be harming us if we eat fish. Since it’s stated that studies show fish off the west coast ingest over 12,000 tons of plastic a year (Surfrider, 2011), this could affect those who eat fish. The visual shows what appears to be sushi wrapped in plastic. The plastic that the sushi is wrapped in has a very thick and wet look and the center of the sushi is stuffed with plastic also. The plastic resembles the plastic bags that we get from grocery shopping because of the wording you can see on the plastic. The sushi does not have a very appetizing look, even with the chopsticks that are laying along side of it. The sushi has a blue center which draws your attention to the words in blue print. The blue wording is in all caps and is also bolded. The bolded text in caps gives viewers an immediate alert. The text brings attention to the eye as it forces you to focus on the blue centered sushi as well. The smaller print below provides details about the image and gives more of a clear understanding of why the sushi is wrapped in plastic. The text also reference a website that’s stated to help turn the tide on plastic pollution.There are many effective elements considering the Rhetorical situation. To inform was the purpose of the visual, the visual was effective in doing so by first catching the viewers eye by text which went along so well with the visual because it included just enough information to inform you of the what and why. The wording “What goes in the ocean goes in you”, can cause one to pause and think about what does the ocean have to do with me and what goes into it. The message was made clear with a brief explanation of what studies have found. I felt as though the visual elements were presented well. The most effective aspect of the visual was the image itself, the sushi which is fish being wrapped in plastic was a great way to describe plastic pollution and how it can affects us. The Rogerian model could best be supported with this visual because the issue at hand could have more than one perspective. The Rogerian model allows for an argument to be led from problem to solution, and the visual provided us with the problem of plastic pollution and then it provided us with a solution which was how to turn the tide on plastic pollution by providing a website to visit. What goes in the ocean goes in you would not pose a clear statement from a viewer’s standpoint. However, the visual and information provided presented a problem and a solution to help piece together an understanding of this visual making it very effective.

A 58-year-old female is admitted for a workup for a complaint of neck and low back pain. During admission, you discover that she underwent a renal transplant six years ago. The patient also had blood work collected. When you review the findings, you notice that her serum calcium is elevated at 13.9 (Normal values range from 8.5 to 10.2 mg/dl), her CBC shows a hematocrit of 33%, and haemoglobin of 11.1 g/dl (normal adult female hematocrit Range: 37-47%, normal adult female haemoglobin range: 12-16 g/dl). What could be the underlying cause of her pain and her abnormal lab values? What other assessments would be helpful? What interventions might be considered?

Deaux’s article “Social Identity” not only introduced you to various social identity categories but also to some theories concerning the nature of social identities. You learned that all social identities affect your thinking, your emotions, and your behavior. For example, you may or may not share the way people attribute certain characteristics to specific social identities; one or more of your social identities may evoke strong emotions in you, and different social identities may influence you to behave in certain ways. Considering that society attributes certain stereotypical traits to different social identities, at this point in the course, which of your social identities do you believe conforms most/least to the stereotypical traits attributed to it by society—and in what ways? Which one of your social identities evokes deep, strong emotions, and in what ways does this emotional connection manifest itself in your life? In what way(s) do any or all of your social identities influence your behavior when you are with people who are like you/different from you—and in what ways do other people’s or groups’ behaviors influence your social roles? Once you have spent some time reflecting on these questions, summarize your responses and add at least one new insight or question-related to the connections you perceive between social identities and diversity.

feedback from week 1: Please include more about fan demographics in Japan and around the world: what are their ages, genders, and so on? Please check the word length requirements and/or include the word count in the document and then follow the week 2 instruction. https://www.homeworkmarket.com/files/reviewessayinstructions-pdf-6238981, https://www.homeworkmarket.com/files/japaneseproduct-docx-6238983.

This week, locate two education-related presentations that interest you. In the presentations you select, you must be able to both hear and see the speaker. You may locate your presentations in the Library or other sources of your choice. After watching the two presentations, respond to the following questions for each speaker: What was effective about this speaker’s style? What did this speaker do well that you would also like to do in your own public speaking? In what area was the speaker the weakest? What is something you made note of to avoid in your own public speaking while watching these presentations? Critique the speaker’s body language, use of hand gestures or movement, audience eye contact, nervous twitches, posture, filler words, etc. What was effective? What was not effective? Which of these two presenters was the better public speaker from your point of view? What makes you say so, based on what you know from this week about best practices in public speaking? Length: 3-4 pages References: Practice citing multimedia sources by providing APA citations for both presentations that you viewed, both in-text and in a reference list in APA format at the end of your paper.Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards

Satire Unit ProjectPart 1:For this Unit Project, you will be writing a satirical essay addressing a problem in your community. You may choose community on any level: local, school, national, or world. You may choose a topic as large as global warming or as focused as uniforms in your high school. I recommend choosing something on the national scale for ease of research.Click on the link in the Red Box to view the Project Rubrics for this project.Possible topics could include:Global warmingHealth careFood stamps or unemployment benefitsGun controlImmigrationNSA domestic surveillanceGay marriageMarijuana legalizationNational debtEducation reformThese are a few suggestions, but you may choose any topic that you can satirize. (The exception to this is abortion rights. This topic is off-limits for this essay.)Once you have chosen a topic, your paper should explain the debate:What are the arguments on either side?What logical, ethical, and emotional appeals are used?Who are the key figures in the debate (politicians, actors, news pundits, etc)?Use a minimum of four quotes, properly cited.Then, propose a ridiculous solution to the problem. Proceed with your paper by using logical, ethical, and emotional appeals to make a satirical case as to why your ridiculous solution is the “best” solution.Your whole essay should be written in a satirical tone, in the way that Swift does in Modest Proposal. (You can also refer to Stephen Colbert as an excellent modern example.) Sell your solution!You must use all three of the following satirical devices:

Research Paper in mla formats 12 font times new Roman double space 6-8 pages. About the operation bootstrap

3 page minimum APA formalInformative paper on a person that contribute to social justice in the United States, gender, civil rights, enviromental etc.reflection on the person .look for conceal or counter story of a person not just dominant Story

Who can create a professional development plan for me?stating your goals and how you are going to achieve them professionally. must be typed.