Engineering

****Only use these three online repositories to locate these sources—do not consult Google or any other search engine.**** Open these three links to digital repositories containing resources related to the dropping of the atomic bomb. Browse through each repository (Truman Library Collections, Voices of the Manhattan Project, and National Security Archive), and think about how useful these repositories would be to you if you were a historian seeking to write a biography on the scientist Leo Szilard (pronounced SIL-lard) who helped develop the atomic bomb and also campaigned against its use. https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library https://www.manhattanprojectvoices.org/ https://www.atomicheritage.org/ As you explore each repository, try to locate the following primary sources that you might consult to write a chapter about Szilard’s campaign against dropping the atomic bomb. Each primary source is located in only one of the above repositories. Try your best to locate each source, but it is OK if you are not able to locate all three. If you are successful in your search, try skimming through the sources you find. 1.The transcription of the oral history interview with Tom Evans, a close friend of President Truman’s, discussing scientists’ opposition to the use of the atomic bomb 2.A petition against the use of the atomic bomb circulated by Szilard directed toward President Truman 3.An interview with Lilli Hornig, a scientist who signed Szilard’s petition against the use of the atomic bomb To do this, develop search terms similar to the examples shown in the Module Two Module Overview. Only use these three online repositories to locate these sources—do not consult Google or any other search engine. Take notes on the search terms that are successful and keep the links to the sources you find. In two to three sentences, respond to each question. To develop your responses, combine your experience using search terms to locate the three primary sources in this module with your own reflections on the questions posed. Regardless of whether or not you were able to find all three primary sources, complete all question prompts before you submit your responses. If you were not able to find the primary sources, let your instructor know what search terms you did use so he or she can provide you with feedback on how to develop effective search terms. 1.Describe your overall experience locating these primary sources. Was it challenging or straightforward? Do you learn anything interesting along the way? 2.Were you able to locate an interview with Tom Evans, a close friend of President Truman’s, who interacted with scientists who were trying to reach Truman with their campaign against the use of the atomic bomb? Share your search terms and a link to the primary source. 3.Were you able to locate a petition against the use of the atomic bomb circulated by Leo Szilard directed toward President Truman? Share your search terms and a link to the primary source.4.Were you able to locate an interview with Lilli Hornig, a scientist who signed Szilard’s petition against the use of the atomic bomb? Share your search terms and a link to the primary source

I decided to focus on Michigan (where I live) and the neighboring state of Wisconsin, it is a possibility one day we may relocate. As long as regulatory requirements differ from state to state, each state border represents an obstacle to portability—potentially preventing access to professionals and access to care (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, n.d.). Wisconsin and Michigan are both located within region five.I first wanted to explore the practicing regulations for both states and what that means as a practitioner. Michigan’s Board of Nursing (B.O.N.) is the regulatory agency for the state in which I reside and plan to practice as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. Michigan’s Regulatory Structure is considered Restricted Practice, State practice and licensure laws restrict the ability of N.P.s to engage in at least one element of N.P. Practice. State law requires career-long supervision, delegation, or team management by another health provider for the N.P. to provide patient care (Michigan, 2020). Wisconsin Board of Nursing (B.O.N.), is the regulatory structure for our sister state. Wisconsin’s Regulatory Structure is considered Reduced Practice, State practice and licensure laws reduce the ability of N.P.s to engage in at least one element of N.P. Practice. State law requires a career-long regulated collaborative agreement with another health provider for the N.P. to provide patient care, or it limits the set of one or more elements of N.P. Practice (Michigan, 2020). After reading more into both regulations, it is my understanding in both states as a Nurse Practitioner that I would not be allowed to open my practice. I will always need to be in collaboration with a physician. Neither Wisconsin nor Michigan will recognize a Nurse Practitioner as a primary care provider. Both will allow a Nurse Practitioner to prescribe Schedules II-V controlled substances if delegated by a physician. For example, in either to state, if I were to see a patient that was diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder and wanted to prescribe Ritalin, I would have to have my collaborating physician review the chart consult before prescribing the medication. The second regulation I would like to compare is the ability to have a Medical Staff Membership. According to the A.A.N.P., in Wisconsin per rule WI ADC s DHS 124.12 Nurse Practitioners are not permitted to join medical staffs. In the state of Michigan per the A.A.N.P. M.C.L.A. 331.1303 Each board of trustees and subsidiary board may select nurse practitioners for membership on their medical team. I was surprised when I read this regulation: Nurse Practitioners in our hospitals here in Michigan and round with the providers. The cost reduction in medical services alone, I feel, would be substantial enough to disseminate this regulation. A Nurse practitioner working with a physician to see patients in the hospital can lead to more efficient and quality care and provide decreased wait times for patients.

What are your thoughts about the current approaches to disease prevention and control? In what ways do you think they support the nation’s public health agenda?

The Emergency Operations Plans can have many first steps. Name 3 that would be important at your work location.

Assignment – Descriptive Statistics and Graphic DataThe objective of this assignment is to analyze data in order to model a population or process and make a conclusion. Students will utilize Minitab to create descriptive statistics and describe data graphically (dotplots, histogram, stem-and-leaf, and box plots). There are three parts of this assignment: 1) describing data graphically, 2) single boxplot, and 3) comparison boxplots. To earn high scores, students will complete all three parts; note that some sections asked you to calculate by hand. Submit your assignment in Word Document as a file attachment in Discussion Board, under forum “Assignment Three- Graphic Data”, see Course Schedule for the due date.Note: The supplemental documents and data file in Minitab are located in Unit Two/Supplement, under folder “Minitab”.1) To have Minitab on your computer, read the instruction for individual student licenses andFree 30-day trial) Data file in Minitab for this assignment3) Handout on how to create Dotplot, Histogram, Stem-and-Leaf and Boxplot and examplesPart 1 – Describing data graphicallyBelow are the ages at which the U.S. presidents began their first (non-consecutive) terms, increasing in order from George Washington to Barack Obama.Presidents Ages (44 of them):

Create your OWN Records Retention Schedule Document. (Reference Figure 9.4 on page 174 in your book)Assignment Requirements:Must include bullets from page 173Must include 5 Record TypesChoose your own department to focus on such as: Environmental Health, IT, HR, Customer Care or Product DevelopmentProvide Retention Schedule Purpose and Scope (include APA References)

Include an image of your self shape.Explain why you created what you did for this project – what was significant about the shape/design and material that you created it with? How did it represent you? As the video mentions, we often use visuals to represent us that are already created. How did creating something from scratch challenge you? What was surprising about this assignment for you? What did it help you learn about shape, line, and color?

medical science or Biomedical engineering I’d like to get an inventional type of research paper as they are way easier to be published. I would be interested in a review paper also not just inventional. And are you capable of running simulations and mathematical software? I am not exactly sure maybe COMSOL. but it depends on the topic.

Review at least 3 articles on Balanced Scorecard and complete the following activities: Write an annotated summary of each article. Give examples of a Balanced Scorecard. As an IT professional, discuss how you will use Balanced Scorecard to manage IT resources in various departments at your company.

AMCE Construction was awarded a contract by State DOT for a bridge rehabilitation contract.  The contract required a three-phase removal and replacement of an existing concrete bridge deck that carried an interstate highway.  The contract incorporated DOT standard specifications which included a concrete mix for Class AAA concrete.  Specifications also required that Class AAA concrete achieve compressive strengths of 3,600 PSI after 7 days and 4,500 PSI after 28 days. The project proceeded and after 7 days, concrete test cylinders from Phase I failed to meet compressive strength.  The State DOT then ordered the contractor to remove and replace the concrete.  Phases II and III also failed to meet strength requirements; however, the DOT did not assess penalties because it deemed the strength of the concrete high enough to safely support traffic loads.  ACME construction sued State DOT to recover additional costs resulting from the tear-out and replacement of the concrete on the bridge deck. ACME Construction argued that it had followed the mix requirements of the State DOT specifications and cited an earlier state case in addition to the case of United States v. Spearin, a 1918 United States Supreme Court case.  Both of these cases (known as the “Spearin Doctrine”0 stands for the proposition that a contractor will not be responsible for the results if it completely followed the plans and specifications. State DOT specifications also required that the concrete be maintained at a specific temperature during curing and that proper moisture be maintained to allow for continued hydration during the curing process.  ACME Construction elected to comply with the curing requirements by the use of wet burlap wraps.  There was evidence during discovery to indicate that the burlap wraps may have dried out during the curing process. Should ACME Construction be able to recover its additional costs resulting from tear-out and replacement on the bridge deck?