English – Article writing

These are the instructions given by my teacher:So far you have written an essay that is theme-based: the open form narrative. For your next assignment, you will be writing a thesis-driven informative essay with a “Surprising Reversal.”You are going to write an essay where you will be seeking to surprise your audience with often overlooked and interesting information about a topic that interests you. You will accomplish this by showing how commonly held beliefs about this subject are incomplete, insufficient, or false. There are two options from which you may choose one:Choose something you know about but which you think other people have an incomplete or mistaken view of. The topic may be a hobby you have, your occupation, your country, etc. Topic selection is important for this assignment, so select a topic that you think may contain surprising and/or often overlooked aspects. Whatever you choose, however, must be something you are personally involved with, and this must be referred to in the essay. You cannot simply go on the Internet and ‘find something.’Interview a family member or friend who has a job and find what is unusual or unexpected about this job. If the family member is a bank worker, for example, you will need to find a few things that we may not know about working in a bank. This is a surprise-reversal informative essay, so you will need to find new information about whatever the job happens to be.Plan The essay will need to include the following sections:Introduction introduce the topic and interest the reader in it. The last sentence should be the Thesis StatementYour experience with the subject/topic – one paragraph. If you are writing about a hobby, for example, tell the reader a little about your history with this interest. If you are interviewing a friend/family member about their job, tell the reader a little about this person’s experience in the job.The Common View – tell the reader what you believe people typically believe about the topic, which may be false or true but incomplete.Your New Information – this will be the main part of the essay. This is where you tell your reader some things that they did not know about the topic.Conclusion – finish the essay and leave the reader with a parting thought.Length You should write between 4-6 pages, double-spaced, for this assignment.Your audience: students and faculty with a mistaken or overly narrow view of something because they lack the information that you can provide.Your intentions: discuss commonly held misconceptions about a practice or place and then present your audience with new information that might surprise them.When evaluating the essay, I will consider the following:Does the essay hook and surprise the reader?Does the essay focus on expanding readers’ knowledge by emphasizing facts?Does it provide evidence of the common view effectively in your essay?As a writer, do you come across as fair and reasonable, with an appropriate tone?Does the essay conform to MLA standards?Is the essay well written, grammatically and structurally?Does it show evidence of an effective 

Article attachedSubmit a 2-page Reading Response that uses your academic article (from Lab 40 to interpret either the example of Carlos or Luis from A Better Life.As before, this is a mini-essay that offers a reading of the work and supports that reading. Begin with your Sentence Summary instead of your Literary Analysis. Make sure to include the following:1. Paragraph 1–A one-sentence summary of the work, following the Sentence Summary template below:Sentence Summary Template: In [title of work], [author’s first and last name], [author’s job title], argues that because [cause of trend], [main idea or problematic trend], leading to [effects of problematic trend], citing [author’s main source of evidence], such as [specific example from the author’s evidence]. Sample Sentence Summary: In Kids for Cash, Robert May, Academy Award-winning filmmaker, reveals that because schools have adopted zero-tolerance policies in fear of school shootings, schools, police, and courts are criminalizing youth for minor offenses, leading to the mass incarceration of youth, their separation from their families, disenfranchisement from educational opportunities, mental and emotional health problems such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression, and even overdose and suicide, citing data on national incarceration rates of youth, such as 2.2 million youth are incarcerated every year, 95 percent of which are for non-violent offenses and 66 percent of whom will not graduate.2. Paragraph 2–A body paragraph that interprets the example of Luis offered in A Better Life through the lens of “Cultural Misframing” or “Multiple Manhoods” by going through the following moves:Quoting or paraphrasing scenes or examples from the film and the essay (specifying or detailing)Interpreting the scenes, examples, or passages you quote (interpreting)Analyzing the takeaway significance of the examples (generalizing or analyzing) Sample Reading Response:Victoria ValdovinosDr. StevensonEnglish 1B20 March, 2019Reading Response #5 (“Alienable”)In “Alienable” about a young woman in her 20s who has recently ended a two-year relationship and is trying to console with her friend, Jay, until she realizes people are shielding themselves from the sun like they do not know it is not raining, Yuko Sakata suggests that in relationships it, at times, can be difficult to connect with the other person since people often have differing desires and can change in ways that become incompatible with each other.In any type of relationship, people will often times have trouble connecting with the other person for several reason, and one is having not only what you yearn for in the present, but what you will long for in the future. In a romantic relationship this can certainly be the make it or break it point. If the partners recognize that they have common goals and similar desires then the relationship could be nascent However, when the partners realize they have different aspirations and desires in life they may begin fighting, arguing, blaming each other that their life is not as they wish it was. They will not feel fulfilled in life, they regret decisions, and blame their partner for everything. All that is left is anger, disappointment, and frustration. Most likely, sooner or later, the partners will separate. In ” Alienable,” the young woman explains how she broke up with her boyfriend of two years when the conversation of marriage and family was brought up. The “conversation” ended being an argument where he accused her of “misleading him, claiming that early on [they] had confirmed [their] mutual disdain for the institution ofmarriage and for the idea of delivering any more children into this messed up world.” Yet her views of wanting children changed saying she is “pretty sure” she wants a child now because her parents are getting old. This passage helps show how contradicting desires can make it hard for people to connect and break up relationships.In relationships people can often change in ways that become incompatible with one another, making it difficult to connect. While some changes can alter and improve the dynamics of a relationship, for example being considerably thoughtful and becoming a better communicator, other changes can be off-putting. In “Alienable,” Jay begins telling his heartbroken friend about a couple he knew that recently got divorced. The couple fell in love and got married. The husband was always protective of his timid wife, however, the wife soon began bodybuilding. The husband tried to understand and be supportive, but soon enough he “could no longer touch her. He could no longer sleep with her.” This shows how the wife changing her appearance made it hard for the husband to connect with her physically. Moreover, the wife’ s personality changed which was presumably the driving point of their divorce. After bodybuilding the wife was doubtlessly less timid and did not need protection, which protective is what the husband always was of her. The husband claimed that “he still loved the idea of her, but she was no longer there.” This shows that the change greatly impacted him as he could no longer be the defensive person he wanted to be for her; she could no longer provide this subconscious desire of his.We seek different types of relationships for a variety of purposes—safety and security, love and intimacy, to satisfy physical, emotional, and spiritual needs, to name a few—and it is through our connection with others that we come to shape our view of the world around us.

1. Chapter 16, p. 405, question #1: At each level of the public health pyramid, identify at least two factors that can affect the acquisition of informed consent from those involved in providing evaluation data about a health program.Chapter 16, p. 405, question #2: What might be some effective strategies to prevent the various misuses of evaluations that were described in this chapter?

Discuss how lack of self-knowledge and self-confidence makes you or others you know more vulnerable to fallacious reasoning. Use specific example showcasing what you have learned from this course philosophy to demonstrate how you would solve a common problem you would experience in the workplace with critical thought applied to your decision making and fallacious reasoning would stand in your way

Pick one of the three below to answer.Discuss the historical evolution and laws of occupational safety and health in the US.  Why is occupational safety and health important to our communities?  Provide at least two example scenarios.Define occupational epidemiology, how it addresses occupational injuries and illnesses, and its contribution to prevention and control efforts.What is the Hazardous Communications Program/Policy required in a medical facility?  What are some of the key components and requirements that address the EOC/SOC, and Fire/Life/Safety (FLS)Answer Both of the questions below. . What are the differences between qualitative and quantitative methods? Give at least 3 perspectives briefly state them. What is the role of the Institutional Review Board and informant consent?

After viewing the online productions of Twilight: Los Angeles by Anna Deveare Smith and Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, please write a performance review for each of the plays, focusing on one character of your choosing. While watching the production, pay attention to whose performance stood out to you and why. Please be sure to include the character’s name, as well as the actor’s name who performed the role. Your role as the reviewer is not to critique the actor’s performance, but rather describe what you saw and point out elements of the performance that stood out to you. This does not necessarily mean that everything you write about the performance needs to be praise for the actor. There may have been elements of the performance, or choices made, that appeared confusing, unclear, or ineffective. It is okay to point those elements out, but tell me why they didn’t work rather than simply stating your dislike. Here are some questions to ask while thinking about the actor’s performance:• How did the actor use the space?• How did they respond to the given circumstances (emotional and physical)? • Were they mainly presentational or representational in their style? • How did the actor interact with other actors on stage?• How did the actor manifest the character through physicality? Did the actor engage the whole body?• How did the performance make you feel?I am not looking for a summary of the play. Your focus should be on the character of your choice and that actor’s specific performance. Your paper should include observations that pertain to the questions above, as well as any other elements of the production you would like to comment on. Be specific! What particular moments in the performance made that actor stand out to you? Your paper must include three specific moments that stood out to you and helped you answer some of the above questions.Technical Details: generally, MLA format• Typed• 12 pt. font, Times New Roman• double spaced• 2-3 pages• Header (Name, Professor, Course, Date)