English

Argumentation Essay Write a 750-1000 word argumentation/persuasion essay using any approach as a method of development. You MUST cite a minimum of two references/sources. Research is REQUIRED for this essay. An effective argumentative essay must have evidence to make its case; most arguments that occur in daily life happen in the heat of the moment and are more likely directed toward saving one’s own pride than toward giving clear and supportive proof to one’s claims. Writing Approach Knowing how to brainstorm is going to save you from writing a weak essay. Also, knowing how to support your claims with evidence from outside sources will further strengthen your essay. For that reason, this assignment requires the use of two references/sources. In addition, you will add a Works Cited page at the end of your essay. Finally, your Works Cited page will be in MLA (Modern Language Association) format so that all information provided will be easy for your reader to find. Before attempting this essay: Review all of the chapter sections located in Lessons 6 and 7. Review the available documents and sources located at the Helpful Resources folder on the course menu. Writing Assignment Purpose: to persuade Method of Development: your choice Choose your own topic, but make sure that it is something that can actually be argued.  You cannot argue something that is a fact. You can argue for or against something. Some examples are: Should teenagers be able to play violent video games? Should cellphones be allowed in the classroom? Is social media destroying the way we communicate? The above items can be argued but there are many others to choose from. The choice is yours. If you have something in mind but you are unsure if it will work as an argumentative/persuasive essay, please send me a message through the Messages link for assistance.  Reminders: Brainstorm for topics. Choose one topic, choose a method of development, and organize all details accordingly. Research for appropriate evidence to support your argument. While you are researching, be sure to note all information necessary to fill out your Works Cited page for that entry. Remember your conclusion and your Works Cited page in MLA format. Check the syllabus for due dates.

ESSAY #2: Misattribution of Arousal—How to Apply for Beneficial Outcomes The author of “Misattribution of Arousal” discusses both positive and negative outcomes of this human thinking phenomenon. In the negative, we attribute arousal to a mistaken source, which might lead to embarrassment, or worse. However, this phenomenon can have positive outcomes: it can cause us to positively bond under certain conditions and activities. How do we harness its beneficial effects? What are some strategies to become aware of and apply the Misattribution of Arousal? Review the article so you firmly understand the thinking phenomenon. Be specific in the detail of the strategies as to how Misattribution of Arousal contributes to beneficial outcomes. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS: ? 12-point Times New Roman font; entire document double-spaced; ? Last name and page number on every page in upper right-hand corner; ? Your Name, My Name, Class Name, and Date In upper left-hand corner; ? LENGTH: 1200-1500 words (4-5 pages) FIRST PAGE SHOULD LOOK LIKE THIS: Last Name 1 Student Name Instructor Name Class Name Date Creative Title of Your Own BASIC OUTLINE OF ESSAY: 1. INTRODUCTION PARAGRAPH: a. Explain the Misattribution of Arousal using quotations from the reading; b. Offer thesis statement as last sentence; “Key strategies to create positive outcomes using Misattribution of Arousal are [STATE 1ST IDEA], [STATE 2ND IDEA], and [STATE 3RD, IDEA].” {You can also use a single idea as a thesis}. 2. 1st POINT; “[STATE 1ST IDEA] will bring about the positive effects of the Misattribution of Arousal.” USE PIER PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE 3. 2nd POINT; “If a person [STATE 2nd IDEA], she will see the benefits of the Misattribution of Arousal.” USE PIER PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE 4. 3rd POINT; Individuals who want to draw out positive impacts from the Misattribution of Arousal should [STATE 3rd IDEA]. USE PIER PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE 5. CONCLUSION PARAGRAPH: a. Restate your main ideas; “In summary, [RESTATE MAIN IDEAS] enables people to develop the positive outcomes of the Misattribution of Arousal.” b. State why it matters that we should be aware of the Misattribution of Arousal and want to apply strategies to bring out the positive qualities of the phenomenon ; BASIC OUTLINE OF BODY PARAGRAPHS (NOT THE INTRODUCTION OR CONCLUSION) POINT: INTRODUCE EXAMPLE: EXPLAIN EXAMPLE: ?RESTATE POINT

1 Write a composition using one of the topics listed below. Your composition needs to be three to five paragraphs long. It must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. For the purpose of this examination, sport is defined as “an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment without a predetermined outcome.” If you choose to explain why a certain sport is your favorite, please ensure that the chosen sport fits this definition. • Argue for or against the limitation of speed limits. • Explain why a certain sport is your favorite. • Compare and contrast driving in the winter and driving in the summer. • Describe a SINGLE memorable day in your life. 2 Write a letter of complaint. Follow the rules for a formal letter, and use the full-block style. The complaint may be about anything you wish (such as malfunctioning equipment, poor building maintenance, or disruptive noises from a nearby business). You can base your letter on a true experience, or you can make up all the details you need. Please note that a form letter or a template cannot be used in constructing your response to question 2. When a form letter or template is used, you are giving little to no thought to wording or formatting, and you are not actually creating your own complaint; you are simply filling in the blanks of someone else’s work.

This essay must include a combination of no less than SIX in-text citations from two or more credible and reliable sources. Citations are to be a combination of direct quotations and paraphrased quotations with or without the author’s name, and a Reference List in APA Style must be included. Is eating, hunting, and/or the use of animals for research purposes justified? Should military service should be required for all? Does advertising and the media impact self-image, self-worth, and/or self-esteem? Is modern culture ruining childhood? In order to control crime, should all guns be banned? In what ways are online shopping and “big-box” stores impacting society?

****Poem choicethesis in a separate page please**** Instructions for thesis- We are using this journal as a low-stress way to show me what poem you will write your essay about and which 3 to 5 poetic elements you want to use to explicate the poem. Before you send this to me, please make sure you have read the Essay One Instructions thoroughly, so you can choose your poem and poetic elements in context with what the paper is asking. When you send me your proposal, please write the poem’s name and author (format the title correctly please!), and list the elements you will use.  I am going to take a look and send you feedback about the elements you’ve chosen and give you some tips or hints if they need adjusting or there’s opportunity for you to push it all up to another level. You get 25 points just for sending the complete proposal. ___________________________________________________________________ ENG 201  Winter 2021 Essay One – Poetry Please read the instructions carefully and use the required essay structure and formatting.    Proposal due:  Submit your poem choice and thesis by 1/8 (11:59pm) as a Journal entry. (Look in Module One for the link to the journal.)

Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone. The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels: Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)? Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.

select one topic in “literacy instruction,” and then write a research paper that includes the following: Introduction Problem statement Significance and/or rationale for studying the problem Research questions Annotated bibliography of 6-8 resources that provides some background on the problem The proposed method for studying the problem (qualitatively, quantitatively or mixed methods).  You may use some of your research that you have already completed for this course, but not the exact wording.  You must paraphrase because the software program that is used to flag cases of “unoriginal text” will identify the writing as plagiarism, even though it is your own writing.

Essay 3 Directions DIRECTIONS: In American culture, we are bombarded with plenty of messages and images encouraging us to buy, buy, buy! As consumers, we are persuaded to buy certain items through certain advertising techniques. Your first paragraph should preview your analysis by summarizing ethos, pathos, and logos for the reader. Then, using Janny Scott’s “How They Get You to Do That?” (1) choose two of these marketing tactics. (2) For each tactic, analyze how a specific advertisement from television, a magazine, newspaper, or another form of media demonstrates that marketing tactic and (3) how that advertisement uses ethos, pathos, or logos to appeal to the target audience. REQUIREMENTS  Write 4 full pages minimum. Integrate two sources: Source 1 should be Scott. Source 2 should come from any other reading indicated in the “Approved Sources” in the next slide. Use third person point of view only. Include a Works Cited page that contains your two sources. Refer to the MLA Citations PPT for help. Follow the structure provided in this PPT. Approved Sources for Essay 3 “When Algorithms Don’t Account for Civil Rights” (White) “Does Advertising Ruin Everything?” (Thompson) “Whistling Vivaldi and Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us” (Steele) “The Danger of a Single Story” (Adichie) “Positionality” (Meriam and Bierema) “The Miseducation of the American Boy” (Orenstein) “Little Girls or Little Women? The Disney Princess Effect” (Hanes) Article: “How They Get You to Do That” How They Get You to Do That                                                                          Janny Scott So you think you’re sailing along in life, making decisions based on your own preferences? Not likely! Janny Scott brings together the findings of several researchers to show how advertisers, charitable organizations, politicians, employers, and even your friends get you to say “yes” when you should have said “no”—or, at least, “Let me think about that.” The woman in the supermarket in a white coat tenders a free sample of “lite” cheese. A car salesman suggests that prices won’t stay low for long. Even a penny will help, pleads the door-to-door solicitor. Sale ends Sunday! Will work for food. The average American exists amid a perpetual torrent of propaganda. Every­one, it sometimes seems, is trying to make up someone else’s mind. If it isn’t an athletic shoe company, it’s a politician, a panhandler, a pitchman, a boss, a billboard company, a spouse. The weapons of influence they are wielding are more sophisticated than ever, researchers say. And they are aimed at a vulnerable target—people with less and less time to consider increasingly complex issues. As a result, some experts in the field have begun warning the public, tipping people off to precisely how “the art of compliance” works. Some critics have taken to arguing for new government controls on one pervasive form of persuasion— political advertising. The persuasion problem is “the essential dilemma of modern democracy,” 5 argue social psychologists Anthony Pratkanis and Elliot Aronson, the authors of Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion. As the two psychologists see it, American society values free speech and pub- 6 lie discussion, but people no longer have the time or inclination to pay attention. Mindless propaganda flourishes, they say; thoughtful persuasion fades away. The problem stems from what Pratkanis and Aronson call our “message-dense ? environment.” The average television viewer sees nearly 38,000 commercials a year, they say. “The average home receives . . . [numerous] pieces of junk mail annually and . . . [countless calls] from telemarketing firms.” Bumper stickers, billboards and posters litter the public consciousness. Athletic 8 events and jazz festivals carry corporate labels. As direct selling proliferates, work­ers patrol their offices during lunch breaks, peddling chocolate and Tupperware to friends. Meanwhile, information of other sorts multiplies exponentially. Technology 9 serves up ever-increasing quantities of data on every imaginable subject, from home security to health. With more and more information available, people have less and less time to digest it. “It’s becoming harder and harder to think in a considered way about anything,” said 10 Robert Cialdini, a persuasion researcher at Arizona State University in Tempe. “More and more, we are going to be deciding on the basis of less and less information.” Persuasion is a democratic society’s chosen method for decision making and 11 dispute resolution. But the flood of persuasive messages in recent years has changed the nature of persuasion. Lengthy arguments have been supplanted by slogans and logos. In a world teeming with propaganda, those in the business of influencing others put a premium on effective shortcuts. Most people, psychologists say, are easily seduced by such shortcuts. Humans are 12 “cognitive misers,” always looking to conserve attention and mental energy—leaving themselves at the mercy of anyone who has figured out which shortcuts work. The task of figuring out shortcuts has been embraced by advertising agencies, 13 market researchers, and millions of salespeople. The public, meanwhile, remains in the dark, ignorant of even the simplest principles of social influence. As a result, laypeople underestimate their susceptibility to persuasion, psychologists 14 say. They imagine their actions are dictated simply by personal preferences. Unaware of the techniques being used against them, they are often unwittingly outgunned. As Cialdini tells it, the most powerful tactics work like jujitsu: They draw their 15 strength from deep-seated, unconscious psychological rules. The clever “compli­ance professional” deliberately triggers these “hidden stores of influence” to elicit a predictable response. One such rule, for example, is that people are more likely to comply with a request 16 if a reason—no matter how silly—is given. To prove that point, one researcher tested different ways of asking people in line at a copying machine to let her cut the line. When the researcher asked simply, “Excuse me, I have five pages. May I use 17 the Xerox machine?” only 60 percent of those asked complied. But when she added nothing more than, “because I have to make some copies,” nearly every one agreed. The simple addition of “because” unleashed an automatic response, even 18 though “because” was followed by an irrelevant reason, Cialdini said. By asking the favor in that way, the researcher dramatically increased the likelihood of getting what she wanted. Cialdini and others say much of human behavior is mechanical. Automatic 19 responses are efficient when time and attention are short. For that reason, many techniques of persuasion are designed and tested for their ability to trigger those automatic responses. “These appeals persuade not through the give-and-take of argument and 20 debate,” Pratkanis and Aronson have written. “. . . They often appeal to our deep­est fears and most irrational hopes, while they make use of our most simplistic beliefs.” Life insurance agents use fear to sell policies, Pratkanis and Aronson say. Parents 21 use fear to convince their children to come home on time. Political leaders use fear to build support for going to war—for example, comparing a foreign leader to Adolf Hitler. As many researchers see it, people respond to persuasion in one of two ways: If 22 an issue they care about is involved, they may pay close attention to the arguments; if they don’t care, they pay less attention and are more likely to be influenced by simple cues. Their level of attention depends on motivation and the time available. As David 23 Boninger, a UCLA psychologist, puts it, “If you don’t have the time or motivation, or both, you will pay attention to more peripheral cues, like how nice somebody looks.” Cialdini, a dapper man with a flat Midwestern accent, describes himself as an 24 inveterate sucker. From an early age, he said recently, he had wondered what made him say yes in many cases when the answer, had he thought about it, should have been no. So in the early 1980s, he became “a spy in the wars of influence.” He took 25 a sabbatical and, over a three-year period, enrolled in dozens of sales training programs, learning firsthand the tricks of selling insurance, cars, vacuum cleaners, encyclopedias, and more. He learned how to sell portrait photography over the telephone. He took a 26 job as a busboy in a restaurant, observing the waiters. He worked in fund-raising, advertising, and public relations. And he interviewed cult recruiters and members of bunco squads. By the time it was over, Cialdini had witnessed hundreds of tactics. But he 27 found that the most effective ones were rooted in six principles. Most are not new, but they are being used today with greater sophistication on people whose fast-paced lifestyle has lowered their defenses.  Reciprocity. People have been trained to believe that a favor must be repaid in kind, 28 even if the original favor was not requested. The cultural pressure to return a favor is so intense that people go along rather than suffer the feeling of being indebted. Politicians have learned that favors are repaid with votes. Stores offer free 29 samples—not just to show off a product. Charity organizations ship personalized address labels to potential contributors. Others accost pedestrians, planting paper flowers in their lapels. Commitment and Consistency. People tend to feel they should be consistent— 30 even when being consistent no longer makes sense. While consistency is easy, comfortable, and generally advantageous, Cialdini says, “mindless consistency” can be exploited. Take the “foot in the door technique.” One person gets another to agree to a 31 small commitment, like a down payment or signing a petition. Studies show that it then becomes much easier to get the person to comply with a much larger request. Another example Cialdini cites is the “lowball tactic” in car sales. Offered a 32 low price for a car, the potential customer agrees. Then at the last minute, the sales manager finds a supposed error. The price is increased. But customers tend to go along nevertheless. Social Validation. People often decide what is correct on the basis of what other 33 people think. Studies show that is true for behavior. Hence, sitcom laugh tracks, tip jars “salted” with a bartender’s cash, long lines outside nightclubs, testimonials, and “man on the street” ads. Tapping the power of social validation is especially effective under certain con- 34 ditions: When people are in doubt, they will look to others as a guide; and when they view those others as similar to themselves, they are more likely to follow their lead. Liking. People prefer to comply with requests from people they know and like. 35 Charities recruit people to canvass their friends and neighbors. Colleges get alumni to raise money from classmates. Sales training programs include grooming tips. According to Cialdini, liking can be based on any of a number of factors. 36 Good-looking people tend to be credited with traits like talent and intelligence. People also tend to like people who are similar to themselves in personality, back­ground, and lifestyle. Authority. People defer to authority. Society trains them to do so, and in many situ- 37 ations deference is beneficial. Unfortunately, obedience is often automatic, leaving people vulnerable to exploitation by compliance professionals, Cialdini says. As an example, he cites the famous ad campaign that capitalized on actor 38 Robert Young’s role as Dr. Marcus Welby, Jr., to tout the alleged health benefits of Sanka decaffeinated coffee. An authority, according to Cialdini, need not be a true authority. The trappings 39 of authority may suffice. Con artists have long recognized the persuasive power of titles like doctor or judge, fancy business suits, and expensive cars. Scarcity. Products and opportunities seem more valuable when the supply is 40 limited. As a result, professional persuaders emphasize that “supplies are limited.” Sales 41 end Sunday and movies have limited engagements—diverting attention from whether the item is desirable to the threat of losing the chance to experience it at all. The use of influence, Cialdini says, is ubiquitous. Take the classic appeal by a child of a parent’s sense of consistency: “But you said…” And the parent’s resort to authority: “Because I said so.” In addition, nearly everyone invokes the opinions of like-minded others—for social validation—in vying to win a point. One area in which persuasive tactics are especially controversial is political 44 advertising—particularly negative advertising. Alarmed that attack ads might be alienating voters, some critics have begun calling for stricter limits on political ads. In Washington, legislation pending in Congress would, among other things, 45 force candidates to identify themselves at the end of their commercials. In that way, they might be forced to take responsibility for the ads’ contents and be unable to hide behind campaign committees. “In general, people accept the notion that for the sale of products at least, there 46 are socially accepted norms of advertising,” said Lloyd Morrisett, president of the Markle Foundation, which supports research in communications and information technology. “But when those same techniques are applied to the political process—where 47 we are judging not a product but a person, and where there is ample room for distortion of the record or falsification in some cases—there begins to be more concern,” he said. On an individual level, some psychologists offer tips for self-protection. Pay attention to your emotions, says Pratkanis, an associate professor of  psychology at UC Santa Cruz: “If you start to feel guilty or patriotic, try to figure out why.” In consumer transactions, beware of feelings of inferiority and the sense that you don’t measure up unless you have a certain product. Be on the lookout for automatic responses, Cialdini says. Beware foolish consistency. Check other people’s responses against objective facts. Be skeptical of authority, and look out for unwarranted liking for any “compliance professionals.” Since the publication of his most recent book, Influence: The New Psychology of Modern Persuasion, Cialdini has begun researching a new book on ethical uses of influence in business—addressing, among other things, how to instruct salespeople and other “influence agents” to use persuasion in ways that help, rather than hurt, society. “If influence agents don’t police themselves, society will have to step in to regulate 52 … the way information is presented in commercial and political settings,” Cialdini said. “And that’s a can of worms that I don’t think anybody wants to get into.”   MLA Citation Information: Scott, Janny. “How They Get You to Do That.” Los Angeles Times, 23 Jul. 1992,                https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-07-23-mn-4130-story.html

As we discussed, you will need to prepare a letter to the Dean in order to facilitate your return.  In this communication to the Dean, you will need to include your specific request a 3rdattempt of ID-5000.  You will also need to outline three specific topics; what happened, what has changed, and how you plan to be successful upon your return. Please note that you are petitioning the Dean to make an exception to policy.  It is important to ensure that your communication is free of all grammatical and spelling errors, as this is your opportunity to represent yourself directly to the Dean.  Once you have finalized this correspondence, please return directly to me.  Although it is my role to advocate for you directly with the Dean, please understand that I am not the one that will make any type of determination on the outcome of your request.  Once I receive a reply from the Dean, I will reach out to you immediately to communicate their decision and the next steps that we will need to take in order to finalize your return or other options that may be available to you. 

Draft a 3-4 page (approximately 700-1000 words) comparison/contrast essay in the informative model. In addition, you must answer the “Think About Your Writing” questions, described below, beneath your essay. Requirements Your draft must be 3-4 page (approximately 700-1000 words) Guidelines must be followed or submission will not be graded Double-space your draft and use one-inch margins. Use an easily-readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Your draft must be original and written for this assignment. Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited. Your submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your draft. Your submission must include your answers to the “Think About Your Writing” questions Submit a single file that contains all of the assignment components. Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx. Sample Topic Ideas: Compare or contrast two cities you’ve visited or that you’ve lived in