Health & Medical

The paper is about psychology and neuroscience/neurology. I have the introduction, methodology and results parts of the paper already and need some help with the discussion part. I will upload them so you can write the discussion part.  The Discussion contains a summary of the results, answering the research question, further interpretation of the results, feedback to the literature and implications for theory and / or practice.  The Discussion is written from specific to broad: first the specific research results are described, and then this is linked back to the earlier (broader) literature described in introduction. Implications for theory and / or practice are also discussed. The following aspects should be discussed/written in the Discussion:  Summary of results  -This summary is written at an overarching level  -The construct is being measured, not the variables that have been used  -No statistical data is repeated/written here -No new facts are presented regarding the analyzes / results Feedback to the literature -Are the findings/results consistent with the literature described in the introduction? If not, what are the possible explanations for this? Look beyond differences in sample size and design. Theoretical and / or practical implications of the results  -What do the results mean for the relevant theories, for society, and / or for clinical practice?  -How can the results of the statistical analyzes be interpreted?  -Are the findings/results consistent with the relevant theory (s)? -Should existing theories be reconsidered in light of the findings?  -What are possible alternative explanations if findings do not fit into hypotheses?  -What can be done with the findings in society or clinical practice? Strengths and weaknesses of the research  -What are the strengths of the research? These are as important as the shortcomings. So make sure there is a good balance between this.  -What are the shortcomings of the research? Look beyond sample size.  -To what extent could these limitations have influenced the results? Should the results be interpreted with caution? Or are these restrictions not very serious (and why not)? Recommendations for future research – How can potential shortcomings in future research be overcome?  -What new questions does the research raise? And how could they be investigated/researched? New sources/literature should be used in the discussion and the literature that i’ve used in the introduction, methodology and results can’t be used.

I attached/uploaded the case study. Please answer the 4 questions that are listed after the case study. Which are: 1. Identify and discuss the various IT tools and staff resources UHC used to deploy its education and self-management strategies among patient with chronic disease. What are their strengths? Limitations? 2. UHC identifies several challenges and lessons learned in this case. Discuss each of these including UHC’s approach to overcoming the challenges. What other strategies or approaches might you have considered? Why? Explain your rationale. 3. UHC used curb-side consultations and e-visits to reduce specialty office visits. To what extent are these used by provider organizations in your community? Or others as evidenced by the literature? How effective have e-visits been? Are patients open to them? 4. How might other health care provider organizations learn from UHC’s experiences? What are the critical take-home messages?

research paper on a Public Health Environmental Health topic.  Explain the Environmental situation and why it’s important.  Who/what is being affected?  What “measures” if any are taking place to address the situation? What the potential future consequences are?  What can communities/lay people do to help the situation?

I need help cleaning this up – response from Professor: 1) Introduction not clear – specific sentence “Randomized controlled data shows that in 60-70 percent of instances, as identified compared to the same counterparts, childhood ADHD continues into adolescent year and 58 percent of cases when DSM-V guidelines and parental records have been used.” 2) In the objectives section. I wrote the objectives as if I was the one conducting these activities. Help me so it sounds like a conducted review of literature. what are you trying to achieve? 3) Methods section: Describe how articles are selected not what I did. How will you achieve these objectives? 4) Results: What is it that I found. Please see attachment of powerpoint and edit on there for me.

Hi! I’m looking for someone to write my research paper for me on stress, and how it affects the body and mind, which generally leads to a decline in health. Also including ways to deal with stress. This paper is due on the 12th of December at 11:59 PM. It doesn’t have to be an A+ paper, just has to be around the B… B+ range. Thank you! Have a great day. Instructions…. Find three (3) peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last ten (10) years (2010 to 2020) covering original scientific research in your area of interest. Original research means the authors conducted the research themselves, recruited a sample (of any size), collected data, and analyzed results. You cannot use a meta-analysis, a systematic review of the literature, a theoretical paper, or a scientific opinion piece; original research only. This research can include experiments, correlational research, observational research, or case studies. Do not use archival or historical research.  Introduction This section is where you will define and describe the topic of interest and why it is important. You’ll use research and sources beyond your three original research articles for this section (You may use the textbook for this section as well, but it cannot be your only source). For example, if you wanted to research the efficacy of psychotherapy among patients with schizophrenia, in your introduction you can include information on the prevalence of schizophrenia (percentage of the population with schizophrenia) in the United States or in the world, along with the national or global economic costs of schizophrenia, and the negative health outcomes of people with schizophrenia, and its impact on the mental and physical health or their children or families.  Introduce the four original studies you read. Include who conducted the research and where. What was each of their primary research question/focus? What was their population of interest? What was their main hypothesis (what did they expect to find)? Methods Summarize and compare each study’s methods. This includes their recruitment strategies, the size and demographics of their samples/participants, and their research procedures. Early in this section, be sure to state the type of research that was conducted (e.g. experimental, correlational, observational, etc.). Then, based on your textbook readings, evaluate the studies’ recruitment strategies, samples (Did they match the population of interest? Were they diverse?), and their procedures (What limitations, if any, do you notice in their procedures? How valid does the study appear to you? I.e. Based on their procedures, how accurately did the study research what they intended to research?) Results Summarize and compare the major findings from each study.  Discussion Summarize and compare the discussion and conclusions drawn from each study based on their respective findings. Based on your evaluation of their methods, do you think their discussion/conclusions were logical or a bit of a stretch? What were the implications of their findings? (e.g. if a study showed TMS to be mostly effective in treating schizophrenia, what would that mean for the psychology field and for the population of people struggling with schizophrenia?). Be sure to also discuss the generalizability of their results based on their sample size and demographics as well as any ethical considerations or limitations you noted. Future Research If you had all of the money and resources in the world, how would you conduct research in this area? Briefly describe your proposed methods including sample recruitment, sample demographics, and procedures (how the research would be conducted). What would you expect to find (what would your hypothesis be)? What would the implications be if your results supported your hypothesis? What would the implications be if the results did not support your hypothesis?    Step Three: Meet the Guidelines This paper must be written according to APA style with accurate formatting, headings, in-text citations, and references (among others, they also have guidelines for how pages are numbered and how to write out numbers (five vs. 5) in your writing). Any source not properly cited or left uncited could be considered plagiarism. You will need a title page with a running head (with an original title – do not title your paper Research Paper) and a references page. Page requirement: 4-6 pages of writing NOT including your title page, abstract page, or references. Times New Roman font, size 12, double-spaced. The language used must be academic in nature, free of clichés/idioms, colloquialisms, or slang, and must avoid glaring grammatical, spelling, or syntax errors.

Policy, Politics, and Global Health Trends Task Requirements: A.  Prepare your reflection essay (suggested length of no more than of 3 pages) of the values and ethics of a public policy issue by doing the following: 1.  Analyze a health or nursing profession public policy issue that impacts a group of people and requires a policy change. a.  Discuss why you selected this public policy issue.   Note: If you select a local policy, be sure your discussion reflects how the policy will affect more than a single unit, department, or organization.   b.  Discuss the relevance of the public policy issue to the health or the nursing profession, using two pieces of academically appropriate literature from the last five years. c.  Describe the financial impact of the public policy on an organization or on a community. 2.  Analyze how your values impact your position on the public policy issue. a.  Discuss the ethical principle (e.g., autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) or theory that underpins your perspective.   B.  Develop a policy brief (suggested length of no more than 6 pages) for the public policy issue discussed in part A in which you do the following: 1.  Identify the decision maker (name and title) who will receive the policy brief. a.  Explain why the public policy issue requires the decision maker’s attention, using relevant nursing research from the last five years to support your position. 2.  Discuss the main challenges of addressing the selected public policy issue. 3.  Discuss the primary options and/or interventions for the decision maker, including why they are tangible. 4.  Propose a persuasive course of action for the decision maker, including ways to avoid the challenges identified in part B2. 5.  Discuss how you will evaluate the success of your policy brief (top-down approach).   C.  Create a plan (suggested length of no more than 3 pages) for working with an organization or a community to address the public policy issue analyzed in part A by doing the following: 1.  Identify an organization or community that has expressed interest in your selected health or nursing profession public policy issue. a.  Summarize evidence supporting why the organization or community has expressed interest in the selected public policy issue. 2.  Identify three CBPR principles you could use to work with the organization or community to address a policy change for the public policy issue. a.  Explain how you could approach and collaborate with the organization or community. b.  Discuss how the goal of the community or organization aligns with your goal for the selected public policy issue. c.  Discuss the action steps that need to be taken to achieve your goal from part C2b. d.  Discuss the possible roles/responsibilities of the community or organization members, including problem- solving and capacity-building roles. e.  Discuss key elements of developing a collaborative evaluation plan, using CBPR principles. f.  Discuss how you will evaluate the success of your community or organization plan (bottom-up approach).   D.  Analyze (suggested length of 1 page) the strengths and challenges of the top-down and bottom-up approaches in achieving policy change(s) to support your selected public policy issue by doing the following: 1.  Discuss the strengths of each approach to implement change for the selected public policy issue. 2.  Discuss the challenges of each approach to implement change for the selected public policy issue. 3.  Discuss which approach you would recommend as the most effective to address the selected public policy issue.   E.  When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format. *I WILL ATTACH A SAMPLE PAPER THAT WILL MAKE THINGS A LOT EASIER 🙂

It is a research paper based around a question, the questions I have based the essay research  around are What are a handful of policies or practices from other countries that could significantly improve American healthcare? and Why are some Americans so scared of having a public option for paying for healthcare?

What healthy change did you choose to work on in your life during this semester? Did you find that you were able to change your behavior to your desired outcome? What supported you in your efforts? What challenges do you still need to overcome in order to improve your health behavior? Will you continue to work on your health behavior after this course is over? What will you integrate from what you learned in class into your life to improve your health behavior? What does your future look like pertaining to your health behavior now?

answer the following questions. 1.     Mention and discuss the role of nursing in occupational health 2.     Describe and discuss the four types of exposures and hazards in the work place   A minimum of 3 evidence-based references no older than 5 years must be used.  with the proper references no older than 5 years as well and make sure the references are properly quoted in your assignment.  A minimum of 800 words not to exceed 1,000 are required without counting the first and last page.   Plagiarism free please

Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point.Support your content with at least four (4) citations throughout your paper. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the paper1.    Imagine a clinical scenario and analyze the complements using the Foundation of Knowledge Model. How did you acquire knowledge? How did you process knowledge? How you generate knowledge? How did you disseminate knowledge? How did you use feedback and what was the effect of feedback on the foundation of your knowledge?2.    How would you describe cognitive informatics (CI)? Reflect on a plan of care that you have developed for a patient. How could cognitive informatics be used to create tools to help with this important work?