Law

Background: To create a win–win situation for itself and the other governmental agencies serving the same jurisdiction, a police agency may act as a bridge or go-between for funding initiatives that a state agency or funding source awards to a community organization. Question: What can the police or police agencies do to create a better Win-Win situation with the community, such that it helps to increase trust between the police, and the community, resulting in lower crime, and higher reporting of crimes from the community? Requirements: Minimum Three Pages APA Format Title Page Introduction, Body, Conclusion (900 Words) References Davis, J. & Ortmeier, P.J. (2012). Police administration: A leadership approach. Retrieved from https://full-bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/0077551974/cfi/67!/4/[email protected]:53.0

Each response must be at least 200 words in length. Q1: How do the courts create laws? Q2: What are the sources of law other than the courts? Q3:How do government executives exercise control over the courts? Q4:How do you legislatures control the court?

300 words per question?????? Your main post must be supported (cite at least one source) using APA (1) in-text citations and (2) list of references. Remember you can borrow ideas or information from any place but must (a) summarize the information in your own words, and (b) cite your sources. None of our discussion questions can be answered in only one PARAGRAPH – each major thought or idea should ideally be discussed in a separate paragraph. Be sure to cover all parts of each question. Post as ONE file and please repeat each question and then write your response under it. You must space out your work so it is clear which part of the question you are answering at any point! Please respond to each of the following TWO QUESTIONS using at least 300 words per question. Write the number of WORDS used ONCE at the end of each of your two responses (two numbers only). Question #1: 1. What is probable cause? What are the three ways whereby probable cause is established? How does one differ from the other? What do you need probable cause to do in law enforcement? WHO IS A MAN OF REASONABLE CAUTION IN LAW? Question #2: 2. Define reasonable suspicion. For what purpose can it be used in law enforcement? Compare probable cause with reasonable suspicion – be detailed please. WHAT IS A “HUNCH” USED FOR IN LAW ENFORCEMENT?

1.Which theory do you agree with and why? 2.To which theory do you think Bryan Stevenson agrees with and why? 3.Give an example of a social program that would deter crime based on one of these theories.Please watch video: Link listed below  https://www.ted.com/talks/bryan_stevenson_we_need_to_talk_about_an_injustice?referrer=playlist-121 Remember to cite to the textbook and any outside resources you may reference such as current event articles and TedTalks.

How has the public support of government bureaucracy changed in recent years? In the past, what has accounted for public support of bureaucracy? What actions can be taken to restore trust and confidence in bureaucracy? . How is the American structure of government and public administration different from that of other nations with a parliamentary form of government? Why is it different? How can an organizational structure be politically significant? Discuss and cite recent examples. What are the public administration’s intellectual links to economics? To political science? To sociology? To psychology? To business administration? Discuss the changing roles of public, private, and nonprofit agencies in addressing public problems. What difficulties might a public manager face in trying to implement management techniques borrowed from the private sector? How have technological changes affected the government in general and public administration in particular? Discuss the effects of electronic government (e-gov) on bureaucracies. Be sure to describe changing public expectations as well as the size and structure of bureaucracies in your discussion. What elements of social change have contributed to the expansion of administrative responsibilities in the American government? Discuss the specific impacts of social change on the scope and activities of administrative agencies. A fundamental assumption of administrative reformers in the late 1800s and early 1900s was that politics could have only adverse effects on administration. How valid is that belief? Why? How, and to what extent, do current administrative structures and practices reflect that assumption? Discuss the contributions to the academic field of public administration made by the following individuals: (a) Woodrow Wilson, (b) Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick, (c) Herbert Simon, and (d) Alan Altshuler. During the early 2000s, state and local governments faced severe fiscal constraints. How has this trend affected the field of public administration? If this trend continues, how will it affect the field of public administration? If growth declines, what are the implications for public employment? In recent years, how has the role of the bureaucracy become more apparent in the daily lives of Americans? Is there anything in your own personal or career experience that shows similar expression of public sentiment? Can you think of areas or agencies in which the public has shown a positive attitude toward government and public administration? Discuss.

Explain why no single factor can be considered the cause of the crime decline in the 1990s? or is there a single factor? Discuss how the wars on crimes /drugs have impacted incarceration and how it serves to undermine the collective efficacy of neighborhoods. After reading the article Broken Windows answer this question. (Link below) https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/ Can the break the window-based policy of a PD be effective and if so, how would you put safeguards in place to ensure that the policy does not get corrupted by racist and socioeconomic bias?

Discussion Question: NO HEADER NO TITLE PAGE ANSWER DISCUSSION QUESTION IN 2-3 PARAGRAPHS In light of this century’s development of modern electronic devices, do you think that the Fourth Amendment should be modified in terms of the search & seizure of electronic devices? If so, discuss what modifications you think should be made and why? If not, discuss why you do not think modifications need to be made and why. Are there any exceptions to the Fourth Amendment that may also be applicable? Be sure to use resources to substantiate your thoughts.

Instructions Take the quiz on the legality of police stops: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/quiz-spot-the-illegal-police-stop/ 1. How did you do on this quiz? 2. What surprised you most on the questions that you got wrong? You must submit this assignment to the Assignment AND post it in the chapter forum. 10% penalty per day late.

INSTRUCTIONS: First you are defining 6 terms and secondly you are answering a question.   1) Define the following 6 ethical principles: autonomy, nonmaleficence, justice, veracity, fidelity, beneficence. 2) Then answer the following question: What is an Ethical dilemma?

I’d like you to outline Wallace v. Bowen similar to how I’ve done in my lessons and respond to the following: Now that you have read and understand the three main powers of agencies (legislative, executive, and judicial), would you say that agencies are the hidden “fourth branch” of government as mentioned in the first chapter? What are the checks on agency power? In a time when Congress is so divided and compromise between the parties is difficult to achieve, should more power be handed over to the agencies, who are made up of experts in the field? Are a person’s rights being truly protected if only informal adjudication is required? Your outline of Wallace should have the following: Issue: What is the main question that the courts are answering in the case Rule: What logic does the court apply to the question Explanation: How does the court apply the rule to the issue/question Conclusion/Holding: What did the court conclude in regards to the question. This is not whether the court remands the case or affirms it, rather how did they answer the question.