Law

Understanding due process in the trial process is very complex and extends not only through the process of investigation and prosecution of the accused, but also to the sentencing and punishment phase of the system. For this assignment, you will be required to select one of the three subsections of sentencing safeguards (bifurcation, proportionality, or cruel and unusual punishment) and create a PowerPoint presentation that outlines the evolution of this protection starting with the Constitution and tracking the case law that shapes the modern application of the safeguards in criminal procedure. Imagine that you will be presenting this to an audience in a room with the presentation projected on the wall. Make sure that all your fonts are at least 28 points, and that you have reduced the amount of reading to a minimum. The notes section of the PowerPoint should contain your narrative that is essentially a script for the presentation. Graphics should be used as needed and be professional. Use the availability on the slide wisely, and remember that you have someone in the third row trying to see what you have created, so choose a background that will provide a high contrast with the text. It should be a minimum of 15 slides, not counting the title and references slides. The case law should be restricted only to US Supreme Court cases with rulings that deal with the sentencing safeguards from the lecture material. Each slide must contain at least four bulleted items of information. You must follow APA guidelines for the citation of your sources, both in-text and on your reference slide. 

Please reply at a minimum of 150 words to the discussions attached.  Brittany,I believe some methods to help reduce recidivism is by providing resources to help those released integrate back into their communities.  These programs could include substance abuse programs from those who struggle with alcohol and drug dependency, helping with housing placement, and teaching marketable skills.  Recidivism can also be reduced by working with business owners to provide jobs for those with skills who are released from jail.  Having a no defect mentality can make those who have recently been released feel like they are a burden on not only their families but the community as well.  Helping to create productive members of society who feel that their mistakes won’t always be held against them can make a huge difference. Many people released from jail have difficulty finding work to support themselves and their families.  This makes it east to fall back into old habits and increases the likelihood of committing additional crimes.REPL,Samuel,One way of reducing recidivism in the state and federal prison system is by putting more correctional educational programs in the systems for the individuals that are incarcerated. This will reduce the funds of building a semi-autonomous school district outside the prison and put inside the prison system. This will give the individual’s the chance to obtain a degree or trade. Intern, this should lower the percent of the individual’s returning to prison and giving them another chance in society. Plus, with the educational program will offer adult literacy/ basic skills, high school diplomas, and will help individuals with learning disabilities.REPLY

Formation of the UniverseThere is many theories about the formation of the universe, with the Big Bang theory as the most popular.  You will research 2 or more of these theories. For your 1-2-page paper with cites references: Explain the background of your selected theories (at least two).  What available evidence supports and disproves each of the theories?  What are at least two similarities and two differences? Which theory do you believe best supports the development of the universe. Examples of the Common Theories include Big Bang Theory, Cosmic Inflation Theory, Oscillating Universe Theory, Big Crunch Theory Steady State Theory, Cycle Universe Theory, String Theory, etc. Helpful and reputable websites: https://www.thoughtco.com/https://www.space.com/https://www.nasa.gov/https://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you answer the following questions:What are the benefits of an evaluation plan?What are the differences between a process evaluation and an outcome evaluation?What are the types of budgets used in grant funding? Why are these types of budgets used?

For your final project, you may choose to prepare a Final Research Paper or a Kaltura video research presentation on up to two of the following topic areas ONLY .A gang of your choice (i.e. Bloods, MS-13, Crips, etc.)A gang-type of your choice (i.e., street gang, rogue police gang, crime ring, female gang, outlaw motorcycle gang, etc.)Gang intervention strategies (i.e. sociological, societal, educational, etc.)Law enforcement gang-intervention strategies Write a research paper between 4-6 pages (excluding title and reference page, no abstract needed) or record a 15-20 minute Kaltura video presenting and discussing your research on your topic choice. You are expected to select up to two major topic areas as the focal point of your research. Your paper or video should reflect in-depth research and your research must include at least two scholarly sources. 

Part 1: Answer the following question (10 marks)Nadia printed brochures and flyers for her business by copying several pictures from the internet without acknowledging the copyright owners. She also downloaded music from the internet without permission and had inserted it in her business website background. Advices Nadia on her potential liability based on Malaysian Copyright Act 1987.Plaintiff Leslie Kelly, a professional photographer who has copyrighted manyof his images of the American West, licenses those images to other Web sites.The defendant is Arriba Soft Corp., an Internet search engine that displays its resultsin the form of small pictures. Arriba copied 35 of Kelly’s images to its database without Kelly’s permission and used them on its Web site so users could click onthose small picture’ “thumbnails” to view a large version of the picture. WhenKelly discovered this, he brought suit against the defendant for copyrightinfringement. What critical factors are analyzed in determining whether the useof a particular case is fair use? Decide if Arriba Soft Corp.’s use of the picturesis a far Part 2: Answer one of the following questions (10 marks)A medical foundation used IDX’s medical billing software. IDX’s competitor isTwo Epic employees left and went to work directly for the medical foundation, and soon thereafter, the foundation switched its software supplier-toEpic. IDX alleges that these two employees used their new positions totransfer valuable information to Epic, about how IDX software works, and soon, thus enabling Epic to enhance its own software package. IDX filed suitalleging the two employees misappropriated IDX’s trade secrets. Analyze thestrength of IDX’s case?As more trade secrets are in digital format, they are ever easier to steal, misappropriate, or publish on the Internet. It is a critical management task to control employee access, knowledge, and use of trade secrets. Strategies to protect trade secrets, therefore, take on a heightened impacts Discuss 2 key strategies that businesses need to employ to protect their traditionsList the critical elements that a plaintiff needs to prove in a trade secre(a) Antonious is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,482,279 (“the 279 patent”),which is directed to an improved perimeter weighting structure for metal golfclub heads. Spalding sells the Intimidator golf club line. The Intimidator lineincludes drivers and fairway woods that use what Spalding refers to as “titanium insert technology.” Antonious saw several Spalding Intimidator metal wood-type golf clubs in retail stores. He purchased one of the Intimidatordrivers and cut open the clubhead. After inspecting the interior of the clubhead, Antonious concluded that Spalding’s club infringed his 279 patent.Discuss Antonious’s legal Analyze the case Amazon.com, Inc. v. Bamesandnoble.com, Inc. 239 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Gir. 2001) by summarizing the facts and stating the court decision.

A legal memorandum serves many different functions. Sometimes, you are asked to take the law and argue that the law is in your client’s favor. Other times you might be asked to argue how that law specifically defeats your opponent’s case. This is known as “persuasive” writing—the memorandum seeks to persuade the reader of a specific idea. In the “memo” below, your job is not to persuade, but rather to research, and apply the law. To “tell it like it is.” Your boss is asking you to apply a case to your client’s particular facts and let her know if the case is going to help or hurt her new client, Sam Nguyen. You are asked to make a prediction—and write a “predictive” or objective legal memorandum. This memo will go to your boss, not the court, which is known as an “interoffice” (within the office) memorandum. To: Paralegal From: Attorney Susan Maruca Re: Client/ Sam Nguyen; Postsecondary Child Support Date: May 19, 2019 I was just hired to represent the obligor in a child support case in Allegheny County Domestic Relations Court (Pennsylvania). The last time I represented someone in a similar situation, the Blue v. Blue case was in effect. Can pull the case in Nexis Uni write a memo briefing Blue and let me know if it is still good law? Thanks. Assignment Directions Respond to the memo above by writing an objective or predictive memorandum. The memo must include a case brief using the IRAC method covered in Unit 3. The memo must be properly cited using Bluebook citations.

University of Cardiff Title. A short, indicative title is best. Abstract. This is a succinct summary of your research proposal that will present a condensed outline, enabling the reader to get a very quick overview of your proposed project, lines of inquiry and possible outcomes. An abstract is often written last, after you have written the proposal and are able to summarise it effectively. Rationale for the research project. This might include a description of the question/debate/phenomenon of interest, and the context(s) and situation in which you think the research will take place; an explanation of why the topic is of interest to you; and an outline of the reasons why the topic should be of interest to research and/ or practice (the ‘so what?’ question). Issues and initial research question. What legal or governance question(s) do you intend to investigate? (This may be quite imprecise at the application stage); what might be some of the key literatures that might inform the issues (again, indicative at the application stage); and, as precisely as you can, what is the question you are trying to answer? A research proposal can and should make a positive and persuasive first impression and demonstrate your potential to become a good researcher. In particular, you need to demonstrate that you can think critically and analytically as well as communicate your ideas clearly. Intended methodology. How do you think you might go about answering the question? At Bristol we supervise an incredibly wide range of PhDs, including doctrinal, theoretical, empirical, historical, comparative or policy-focused work. Even if your methods are, for example, doctrinal, please do make this clear and give some indication why you think this is the best methodology for your proposed study. If you have a key theorist in mind, do please outline this in your application, together with some understanding of any critiques that have been raised. If you are planning to do empirical work, do please give some indication of what your methods might be (quantitative (surveys, statistics etc); qualitative (interviews, ethnography etc) Expected outcomes and impact. How do you think the research might add to existing knowledge; what might it enable organisations or interested parties to do differently? Increasingly in academia (and this is particularly so for ESRC-funded studentships) PhD students are being asked to consider how their research might contribute to both academic impact and/or economic and societal impact. This is well explained on the ESRC website if you would like to find out more. Timetable. What is your initial estimation of the timetable of the dissertation? When will each of the key stages start and finish (refining proposal; literature review; developing research methods; fieldwork; analysis; writing the draft; final submission). There are likely to overlaps between the stages. Why Cardiff? Why –specifically – do you want to study for your PhD at Bristol? How would you fit into our research themes and research culture (please see the ’10 reasons to study for a PhD at Bristol’ section on the website for more information). You do not need to identify supervisors at the application stage. Bibliography. Do make sure that you cite what you see as the key readings in the field. This does not have to be comprehensive but you are illustrating the range of sources you might use in your research.

I have to write research paper about child neglect crime under Saudi Arabia law but I need just one chapter talk about delimitation of problem • This chapter should include ((instruction of the chapter)) : In this chapter, you do not discuss the law in detail. The best way to start is through a story or real cases/ use facts and figures/ statistics that you may find, and explain the law and its deficiency only briefly, more like as a hindrance to solving the cases in the story; your concern about the law at this point should be that it does not help mitigate or solve the problem or does not help achieve the target goal: protection of children. This part is not all legal: it brings the negative impact that this particular legal decision/ law and policy has had on the society, and its development. • I wrote my draft please use it, also I attached some resources after I translate to English please use them and add more and more different kind of resources • I attached the Saudi child system please use it as we need to mention lack of something in that system • I attached one research as example just to follow the structure this chapter and how make it. • Also I need copy of each resources that you will use in this chapter (( please use many different kind as this is like requirement to write this one • Write huge footnote as you can see in the example

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you answer the following questions: What was the apparent cause of the violation of trust by the public official? How was the breach of trust discovered? Describe the various legal means used to hold the administrative agency accountable. Were the various common laws and statutory laws for holding the administrative agency accountable sufficient? Contrast the effectiveness of the common law with the statutory sources of review authority. What managerial, political, or legal challenges were involved in holding the administrative agency accountable? How was the issue resolved? Do you think the resolution was the best one possible? Why or why not? In what way are public administrators bound by both individual ethics and office ethics? In what ways might these ethical frameworks overlap? In what ways might they diverge? What implications might this divergence have on public administrator accountability? How has this case shaped the future of local, state, and federal administration law in the United States?