Law

Use of Unmanned Aerial VehiclesSince 2010, law enforcement agencies in America have been using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to locate criminal activity in America. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution deals with search and seizure issues. Americans are generally protected from unreasonable search and seizure without a search warrant having been issued by a magistrate.Share your responses to the following points: Define Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and discuss how these vehicles are used by law enforcement agencies. Identify how drones are used currently and by which agencies. Discuss how states are reacting to the prospect of using drones to collect evidence. Explain your opinion on whether a search warrant is required before a drone can be flown over or near private property for the purpose of obtaining evidence of criminal activity. Discuss the other legitimate uses of drones as a law enforcement resource.

The Khalil CaseMichael Khalil was national president of the Avengers Motorcycle Club (AMC), an organization with local chapters in several states. He was convicted of conspiring to conduct the affairs of an organization through a pattern of racketeering, attempting to commit a violent crime in aid of racketeering, and two counts of distributing marijuana.There was evidence that, at Khalil’s direction, the club planned violence against a rival motorcycle club, the Iron Coffins, whose members frequented locals bars in a county where AMC also had a chapter.Research the Khalil case and review the Federal RICO statute. Please use “Avengers motorcycle Khalil” to successfully search details of the case.In the discussion area: Summarize the methods used by the FBI to infiltrate the AMC and gather evidence of Khalil’s crimes. Describe what is the purpose of the RICO section of the federal racketeering law? Describe what is the purpose of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) section of the federal racketeering law. In your opinion, was there enough evidence to prosecute Khalil under RICO? What argument should Khalil make in his defense against a racketeering charge? Why are undercover agents used infrequently in organized crime cases?

Write a 1125- to 1,400-word paper in which you critique conflict management styles. Address the following items: Describe at least three conflict management styles (five are identified in the textbook). Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. Which conflict management style do you use most frequently? Why? Describe the difficulties you have in dealing with others who use different conflict management styles. Describe “groupthink” – which conflict management style does this represent? Why? Refer to at least 3 peer-reviewed outside sources. Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines. Submit your assignment. book link: http://docshare04.docshare.tips/files/31700/317001447.pdf

critically analyse and evaluate the ability of Australian Law to protect client confidentiality and privileged communications between clients and social workers as well as the ability of the Australian law to protect human service workers and related professionals against actions for negligence and defamation. In answer, explain when it may be necessary for human service practitioners to breach client confidentiality, and critically analyse and evaluate possible defences to a breach of client confidence/privacy action. Furthermore, evaluate and critique relevant rules of evidence and procedural law governing privileged communications and the protection of professional confidential relationships. NEED TO SUPPORT ARGUMENT WITH REFERENCE FROM RELEVANT CODES OF PRACTICE, LEGISLATION AND PRECEDENT (CASE LAW) Ensure legislative frameworks governing negligence, compellability of witnesses, privileged confidential relationships and use examples to illustrate argument.

“Law can be either a tool or an obstacle for the believer.” What does this claim mean?

Answer both questions in at least 3 full paragraphs. This is an opinion paper that needs to be supported by facts. I believe that capital punishment is not worth the cost even though I’m pro the death penalty. 1.In a society with limited resources, is capital punishment worth the cost? 2. Does capital punishment really protect us from future danger?

Essay argumentative: Should animals be used for research? Write an essay on the following topic: •Should animals be used for research? Include at least one resources. All of the resources should be seen on your reference page and inside your text as well.  Do not forget to insert heading levels 1 and 2. Create a separate title page and a reference page.

ASSIGNMENT 2 • The concept of Community Oriented Policing was launched to law enforcement agencies around the country in the early 1980’s. It has been introduced as the solution to the problematic nature of police-community relations. Considering the problems inherent in the multicultural composition of both the community and the police and the police subculture, please discuss the feasibility of implementation of the tenets of this philosophy.

A few isolated incidents involving air carrier irregular operations have necessitated governmental intervention into the area of passengers’ rights. Occasionally, situations can arise where ground (tarmac) delays occur either before takeoff or after landing. Takeoff delays could be caused by severe weather in the departure area or air traffic congestion, while delays after landing are usually a result of ramp congestion and/or poor gate utilization. Because of a few extreme cases where passengers have been “trapped” on an aircraft for hours on the ground, the FAA developed rules that airlines must follow in the event that an extended tarmac delay occurs. Airlines guilty of violating those rules face very stiff penalties in the form of fines. Read Tarmac Delays/FAA, (Links to an external site.) and then review the associated 14 CFR rules at Electronic Code of Federal Regulations/Government Publishing Office. (Links to an external site.) Search online, and choose one of many examples where an airline was fined for violating the FAA’s Tarmac Delay rules. In a short paper, critically analyze the situation, and make recommendations that might have mitigated the predicament. Your paper should start with a recap of the circumstances that caused the delay. Be sure to address these questions in your analysis: Were there avoidable operational breakdowns at the OCC or the local station – or was this an unavoidable situation? Once involved in the delay, did the airline do anything to mitigate the impact on the passengers? Would greater use of NextGen technologies (as described in the FAA video included in the module resources) have improved the situation? Your paper should conclude with your recommendations on how the situation could have been better managed. Your paper will include a title page, 2–3 pages of text, and a reference page – all APA formatted. An abstract and table of contents are not needed for a paper this short. Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity. Turnitin is a service that checks your work for improper citation or potential plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any m

Campbell Soup made output contracts with farmers, providing seed and agreeing to purchase the entire crop at a fixed price of $30/ton. The Wentz brothers were farmers who grew Chantenay carrots for Campbell. In 1947, the scarcity of these carrots raised the price per ton to $90. Campbell’s soup needed these particular kinds of carrots for their soup because of their shape, color, and consistency. The contract contained some very lopsided provisions that excused Campbell’s Soup from performing in many cases, but prevented the farmers from selling elsewhere without permission. For each individual grower the agreement was made by filling in names and quantity and price on a printed form furnished by Campbell Soup. The form was quite obviously drawn up by skillful draftsmen with the buyer’s interests in mind. Paragraph 2 provided for the manner of delivery. Carrots were to have their stalks cut off and be in clean sanitary bags or other containers approved by Campbell. This paragraph concluded with a statement that Campbell’s determination of conformance with specifications shall be conclusive. The next paragraph allowed Campbell to refuse carrots in excess of twelve tons to the acre. The next contained a covenant by the grower that he will not sell carrots to anyone else except the carrots rejected by Campbell nor will he permit anyone else to grow carrots on his land. Paragraph 10 provided liquidated damages to the extent of $50 per acre for any breach by the grower. There was no provision for liquidated or any other damages for breach of contract by Campbell. Paragraph 9 stated that Campbell was excused from accepting carrots under certain circumstances. But even under such circumstances the grower, while he could not say Campbell is liable for failure to take the carrots, was also not permitted to sell them elsewhere unless Campbell agreed. What the grower could do with his product under the circumstances set out was not clear. He has covenanted not to store it anywhere except on his own farm and also not to sell to anybody else. Since the contract price was only $30, the Wentz’s sold most of their carrots to Lojeski, who sold half to Campbell. When Campbell’s found out that they were buying “contract carrots” they sued for specific performance. There was no claim by the Wentz brothers that the contract was illegal. Nor was it suggested that there was any excuse for the Wentz brothers who deliberately broke an agreement entered into with Campbell. However, when a party comes to court and asks for an equitable remedy like specific performance (in effect, asking the court to order the Wentz brothers to do exactly what the contract required them to do), the court will not grant this remedy if it is felt that the contract is unconscionable. Is the contract that Campbell Soup entered into with the Wentz brothers unconscionable? Why or why not? What are the ethical issues that are raised here?