Law

Select two of the scenarios provided below. Analyze the facts in the scenarios and develop appropriate arguments and recommendations using case law and scholarly sources. Do not copy the case studies into the paper. Cite your sources in APA format on a separate page. Scenario 1:  Consideration and Capacity Lucinda is on her way home to Grand Rapids, Michigan, from boarding school in Lansing Michigan   to celebrate her 17th birthday with family.  Lucinda’s car has a flat tire in an ice storm and skids into a ditch.  Lucinda is able to walk to the nearest house where an elderly couple offers her food and shelter until her car can be fixed.  Two days later, the snowplows cleared the road, the car is pulled out of ditch, the tire is repaired, and Lucinda is on her way home.  Lucinda’s mother, Louise, is so appreciative of the couple’s care for her daughter that she sends them an email promising to pay $500 to help cover the expenses.  Living on a fixed income, the elderly couple accepts the offer by return email.  Lucinda and her mother get into an argument and Louise refuses to pay couple.  Can the couple hold Louise liable in contract for the services provided to Lucinda? Provide arguments for the parties, determine the outcome and support your answer with scholarly material. Scenario 2: Types of Contracts Dr. Brown was an adjunct instructor North State University (NSU) in Michigan.  Each semester, near the beginning of each term, the parties executed a written contract that always included the following provision: “The parties acknowledge that this agreement may be cancelled by NSU or the instructor at any time before the first class session.”  In the spring semester of Brown’s  sixth year, he filed a complaint with NSU claiming that one of his students, Sylvia Davis, had engaged in inappropriate and disruptive classroom conduct.  Brown gave her an “incomplete” grade and asked NSU to require her to apologize as a condition of receiving a final grade.  NSU claimed, and Brown denied, that he was told to assign Davis a grade if he wanted to teach in the fall.  Toward the end of the semester, Brown was told which classes he would teach in the fall, but the parties did not sign a written contract.  The Wednesday before classes began, NSU terminated him.  Brown filed a suit against NSU and others, alleging breach of contract.    Did the parties have a contract?  If so, what type of contract did they have. Did NSU breach it?  Explain.

Find an article in your local newspaper about a local policy issue that affects you. For example, an article concerning your county’s decision to privatize your trash collection service. Summarize the article and explain how this issue affects you. Is the article neutral? Why or why not? How might you influence this policy in the future? Be sure to include a scanned copy of the article in your submission in addition to citations. There are several free scannable apps on the market such as Scannable. If printing is an obstacle, you may include a hyperlink to the article. However, if the link breaks or can not be accessed the burden falls on you to produce that article or to risk losing points. Articles may not be more than one month old The student uses a relevant and timely newspaper article The student describes the main points clearly. The student identifies how the issue relates to them accurately and in detail. The student provides a detailed account of how they might influence the issue. The student accurately evaluates the source. Source is properly cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of resource and APA citation reference format. The student presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation Article: https://hudsoncountyview.com/jersey-city-council-votes-to-cap-3rd-party-delivery-fees-for-local-restaurants-at-15/

In regards to juveniles, what is shock incarceration? What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of this type of confinement?

Methods Review – Concept Critique Writing Assignment Robert Magnus Martinson was an American sociologist whose 1974 study “What Works?” concerning the shortcomings of existing prisoner rehabilitation programs, was highly influential.  It later became known as creating what became known as the “nothing works” doctrine.   While Martinson was a sociologist, his “What Works?” publication gained national attention and arguably impacted the perspective of many key legislators, important legal minds, and millions of Americans.   For this assignment you must revisit the infamous “What Works?” publication and provide your critique of the famous study.   First, please read the infamous article linked in the assignment folder. The article is long – slightly under 30 pages (when you exclude the reference pages), so please set aside some time when completing this task.  Then, come back and answer the following questions:   Describe Martinson’s sample. Where did he get the data used in his study from? Summarize what Martinson believed about prison rehabilitation as indicated by the conclusion he reached in “What Works?” Is Martinson’s study methodically sound? Why or why not? In answering this question apply the concepts that you have learned in this class. Consider concepts like sampling, secondary data, and how Martinson categorized certain types of “rehabilitation.” Why do you think Martinson’s article gained so much support? Consider the historical context at the time of the article’s publication as well as the views of many leading politicians.   Students must answer all portions of each question in order to earn full credit. The above questions must be answered using full and complete sentences.    This assignment must be type written, in 12-point, Times New Roman font, and uploaded as Word document (.doc or .docx).  All citations should be in APA format. It is highly recommended that students proofread their reflective journal prior to submission, as 5 points (20%) of each submission will be graded on correct usage of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.     This assignment is worth 25 points and is due on 01/11/21 11:59pm. link: https://www.gwern.net/docs/sociology/1974-martinson.pdf

Case study with 4  small writing assignments that consist of 2 pages for each assignment. You do not have to do a title page. I’m attaching a document with the case study and writing assignments and their instructions.  The case study is based on a juvenile who becomes a delinquent.  The papers must have 2 references and a reference from textbook; I will provide you the name of the book. Book is  Juvenile Delinquency (Justice Series)  by Bartollas; Schmalleger 1st assignment=Discuss the Biological and Psychological Positivist Theory and how it relates to Sarah 2nd assignment is regarding factors that influence delinquent behavior, 2nd ass

I need a PowerPoint created and an paper to follow. Question #3: Construct your own theory building on the research of three disorganization theorists. what is and how does social disorganization develop? select an example and apply the theory. research paper Summary: This project requires you to study three theorists based on a research question that you select, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the base theories and develop your own theory. YOUR WILL NEED TO DO ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ON YOUR THEORIES BEYOND THE TEXT AND ALSO ANSWER HOW THESE THEORIES APPLY TO ADULT OFFENDERS SPECIFICALLY. IN ADDITION, YOU SHOULD WATCH ALL OF THE MOODLE VIDEOS ABOUT YOUR THEORY AND BE PREPARED. This is a research paper assignment with a twist. It requires you to research the information, develop your own original theory and then apply what you’ve learned using real life examples. DON’T FORGET TO INCLUDE YOUR DIAGRAM IN YOUR PRESENTATION AND YOUR PAPER!!! Please submit a minimum of 5 paged double-spaced typed paper—12 Tahoma font. Please cite all sources[1]. Grammar and sentence structure are important! This assignment includes an individual paper and an individual PowerPoint or Prezi presentation. This paper requires you to use three different theories as the basis for a new original theory created by you. You are must prepare an oral presentation. There is a minimum of 7 slides not including the title page that lists the question, question number and your name and a works cited slide that lists your resources. Your presentation and your paper should include an illustration created by you that graphically depicts your theory. The presentation requires you to discuss the theories and concepts that you are using as the basis of your theory and then analyze the validity of this construct. Why is your theory better? For example, my theory is…based on the following three theorists. I selected blank components from each of these theories and used them to form the blank theory. In evaluating the blank offender or phenomenon, my theory when applied explains the behavior/phenomenon in the following way using the following features. I conclude the following in the context of this offender … The (blank) theory states that… I (Author) first developed this theory… in (year). I (Author), while studying in, teaching in or working for (place) tested the theory in research studies or the theory remains untested. The genesis of the theory is… Its major assumptions are… Its strengths are… Its weaknesses are … You will be graded on your organization; knowledge of the base theories or concepts; originality, presentation of the theoretical foundation of your argument; initial statement of your position; response to the issue you are examining; eye contact; elocution; handouts distributed to the class; and you need a diagram to visually explain your theory; your PowerPoint or Prezi will be graded on mechanics, organization should be visually pleasing with graphics and should include a handout for the class. COMMON MISTAKES 1) Did not develop your own theory. The papers thoroughly discuss the foundation theories and then devote a paragraph or two to the main reason for the paper YOUR OWN THEORY! This is the most important part of the paper. 2) High similarity score. Since I deduct the similarity from your final score this can be devastating. 3) Did not review the rubric to see what was supposed to be covered by the paper. 4) Did not use three theories. Come on Shaw and McKay are not two theories-it’s the same theory by two theorists. 5) Did not mention the person who created the theory that you used. 6) Did not include the strengths and weaknesses of your foundation theories or your theory. This is really important because the strengths of the other theories should be part of your new theory and the weaknesses should be “solved” by your new theory. 7) If I told you that you had to represent and your presentation mirrored your paper it’s wrong as well. YOU SHOULD FIX THESE ISSUES IN your paper. [1] You need a minimum of five sources (excluding the test); at least two should be scholarly articles or books; Internet sites must be saved in pdf form and attached.

PART A. Access the site for the National Center for State Courts and locate the “Court Structure Charts.” (See https://www.ncsc.org). Review the charts and answer the following question: How many states label their highest court the “Supreme Court”? How many states, if any, do not label their highest court the “Supreme Court”? For those states that do not label their highest court at the “Supreme Court”, list those states and the name of their highest court. (1/2 point) PART B. Access the website for the United States Supreme Court. (See https://www.supremecourt.gov). Review the biographies of the Justices and answer the following questions: 1) Which president appointed Justice Alito to the Court? (1/2 point) 2) Review the “Frequently Asked Questions” relating to the Justices. Why do the Justices wear black robes? (1/2 point) 3) Review Rule 10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. Is review on a writ of certiorari a matter of right? (1/2 point)

What are some of the main causes or sources of violence? What are the roots of hate and the factors that produce hate crimes? What motivates the new generation of terrorists? Support your answers with evidence from the text and outside sources. Discussion Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score Content 11 points Meets All of the Following Expectations Response to the initial question is complete, concise, and reflects an understanding of the key issues presented in the assigned reading for the group.  Information and opinions are backed up by citing our textbook as well as other sources. 9 points Almost All of the Expectations are Met 7 points Some of the Expectations are Met 5 points Very Few, If Any, of the Expectations are Met / 11 Response 4 points Meets All of the Following Expectations Responses to peers identify strength, pose questions or offer new information to extend the discussion. 3 points Almost All of the Expectations are Met 2.5 points Some of the Expectations are Met 2 points Very Few, If Any, of the Expectations are Met

Please choose one of the following three writing topics: 1.The main question to which you should be responding is highlighted in bold print below. In developing your essay, do not simply answer the questions in order, but try to connect your answers into a coherent essay. The questions are simply intended to stimulate thought on your part, to give you some idea of the kinds of questions you should be considering in your answer. Do you think animal liberation is a crime? If so, what makes it a crime? If not, how do you define a crime, and how does the liberation of animals fall short of that definition?  Do you think the original owners of the animals have rights – for example, property rights – that are violated by their “theft”? Should the liberators have to compensate their “victim”? If the dolphin in Midgley’s essay was truly treated inhumanely, do the owners deserve compensation? Who, then, would be the true victim in that scenario? What constitutes inhumane treatment in the first place? (Notice the equivocation here: The word “inhumane” comes from the word “human.” Are animals, if they are not human beings or persons, entitled to “humane” treatment? What is your definition of “human” or “person,” and to what extent do animals fall under it?) If you do not consider animal liberation theft, explain why not. What moral principle(s) would you invoke here to defend your answer? Would you make an exception in the case of animal testing (i.e. experiments with animals) for the sake of developing life-saving medicines for human beings? How about for the sake of developing perfume, shampoos, lipstick, and other beauty products? Do you think it should play any role in determining the liberator’s guilt whether (or how well) he knew the animal? In other words, if someone off the street decides, as a matter of principle, to free a dolphin from Sea World, should he be treated in the same way as someone who knew the animal “personally”? If not, what is it about knowing the animal and its condition that changes the legal circumstances? Why should that play a role at all? Should that completely exonerate the person or only be a mitigating circumstance?

Final Summative Assignment The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate a modern, criminal justice issue and critically evaluate how criminal justice organizations can properly address this issue moving forward. Students are encouraged to think creatively to provide functional solutions while demonstrating how inter-related criminal justice organizations can best work together. At a minimum students will address the following: a.   An evaluation of how criminal justice systems currently address the issue, from inception to conclusion b.   Analysis of how the issue impacts society and criminal justice organizations c.   Current methodology and practices by organizations addressing the issue d.   Procedural factors restricting or enhancing addressing the issue (both legal and practical) e.   How the criminal justice system, as a whole, addresses the issue f.    Improvements for the criminal justice system to address the issue g.   A comprehensive plan of action for criminal justice organizations to most effectively address the chosen issue h.    How the use of technology impacts the issue you selected The paper can focus on any topic related to course discussion. It may be on the same topic as any of our weekly assignments. The paper can be one of three types: historical; focused on a contemporary policy or practice that is debated or controversial; or directed toward a future policy that can be supported by research (e.g., where should we go from here?). While opinion and interpretations are permitted, this is primarily a research paper  . Do not write in the first person, but as in any well-organized research paper, any opinion or idea not referenced is obviously that of the author. Your primary source of materials must be recently published, scholarly academic articles and books. Avoid newspapers and news magazines for this assignment, except if such stories first piqued your interest. If so, include them. Synthesis-level understanding of the themes discussed in this course is expected. For example, if your paper is on the history of policies used to handle female offenders, then you must critically evaluate awareness  all of the major theoretical models used to explain these policies that are embedded within the course text reading. This is the only reason to refer to materials in the course reading list in your paper; if you do so be sure to include them on your paper’s reference list. Your own unique research is to be based on the other books and scholarly articles you collect to write the paper. The use of textbook readings does not count toward the 10-source minimum needed.