Law

Discuss how does the police work, all the things they do, what rules they follow, and our expectations of them.

Pick one of the four frameworks discussed in the book and write a classic research paper describing the development of the framework, situations where the framework is best employed, and the advantages and disadvantages of the framework as compared to the other three frameworks.

Just need these two questions answered in brief detail. I will attach the chapters from the book.The questions are below:28. The federal use of taxpayer funds for assistance in economic downturns and times of crisis remains a contentious issue. List at least two (2) arguments in favor of and two (2) arguments against federal assistance cited in the text.29. List and briefly describe the four (4) stages of the policy process outlined in the text.

Please read this decision by the Iowa Supreme Court in an attorney discipline case (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DzP9O2hmoUHcpD7SYKgNsrB7uVlrFf8qB2zEhiT1ev4/edit?usp=sharing) and answer these four questions: [a] Should judges care if attorneys submit legal briefs or written motions that are plagiarized? Please explain your answer. [b] Attorney Peter Cannon was punished by the court and by the attorney disciplinary board. Do you think these punishments (taken as a whole) were too lenient, too severe, or about right? Please explain your answer. [c] The Iowa Supreme Court referred to another case involving attorney plagiarism (Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Lane). In that case, the punishment for attorney Lane (suspension of his license to practice) was more severe than the punishment imposed on attorney Cannon. What distinction did the court make between these two cases?  Do you agree with the court’s reasoning? Please explain your answer. [d] The state of Florida requires “personal appearances before the [disciplinary] board for public reprimands for disciplined lawyers” [italics added]. Do you think this kind of public shaming is appropriate or too harsh? Please explain your answer.

The final paper must contain an abstract, 10-12 full pages of content, double-spaced, with standard 1-inch margins and 12-point standard font and a bibliography.  You may use APA or Chicago/Turabian style for the citations.  All papers must use a minimum of five primary and five secondary sources. You may use the sources assigned for this course, but you may not count them toward the minimum sources for your project.  At least two of your secondary sources must be academic journal articles. The Homeland Security (DHS) agency is intended to be the stronger line of defense against terrorism in the U.S. Write a 10-12-page paper answering the following questions: How is the DHS structured, and what are its current anti-terror and counter-terror capabilities? Given those capabilities, what does this indicate about what the DHS considers the most likely type of attack and by whom/what (Individuals? Organizations? Domestic militias? Radicalized residents? Foreign nationals?…) What have you identified as DHS areas in need of improvement? What are its strong points? Are there indications of how the DHS works with national intelligence agencies? Comment on this point, examining what may need improving regarding inter-agency relations and cooperation. Summarize your findings and recommendations as an ‘executive brief’ (no more than 2 pages long). Your recommendations should be realistic, soundly based in current structures and capabilities (this includes strengthening those capabilities as identified). It should take into account potential restrictions of human rights, too. It should also reflect the current state of knowledge regarding homeland security and counter- / anti- terrorism. Include a statement that reflects your findings on what types of terror-related incidents are considered most likely to occur inside the U.S. (all 50 states, not just the 48 continental ones).

Write a 4 – 5 page essay that answers the following questions: Summarize at least two hypotheses proposed to explain Neanderthal extinction.  What specific information do scientists use to support these different claims? (about 1.5 to 2 pages in length) Based on your evaluation of the scientific evidence, which hypothesis for Neanderthal extinction do you find most credible, and why? (about 1.5 – 2 pages in length)

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapters 5 Lesson APA style manual Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers At CU (Links to an external site.) Library Overview (Links to an external site.) How to Search for Articles – the Everything Tab (Links to an external site.) Two additional sources beyond those provided Instructions Research the background of your Congressional representatives based on your address listed with CU – two senators and a member of the House of Representatives. Find out about their previous occupation(s), political experience, family, income, education, and other relevant demographics. What percentage of the vote did they receive to win in their last election? What are two policy issues areas they are interested in? How do these areas reflect their ideologies? Here is a link to get your started: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)  Please choose adres as brooklyn 11222 or queens 11385  Write an essay. Start by identifying all three of your representatives. Then, pick the representative you are most interested in and explain why they interest you. Present the information you found in your research required above in the essay. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 4 full pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources beyond those provided) Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers At CU (Links to an external site.) Library Overview (Links to an external site.) How to Search for Articles – the Everything Tab (Links to an external site.) Grading This activity will be graded using the Assignment #3 Grading Rubric. Week 3 Representative Grading Rubric (125 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies and chooses a representative 20.0 pts The student identifies all three representatives and picks one. 16.0 pts The student identifies two representatives and picks one. 12.0 pts The student identifies a representative. 0.0 pts The student did not identify representatives. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Background info on chosen representative – previous occupation(s), political experience, family, income, education, and other relevant demographics 40.0 pts The student identifies at least five relevant pieces of information about the representative. 32.0 pts The student identifies at least four relevant pieces of information about the representative. 16.0 pts The student identifies at least two relevant pieces of information about the representative. 0.0 pts The student does not identify relevant pieces of information about the representative. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies correct vote margin 5.0 pts The student provides the correct vote margin. 0.0 pts The student did not provide the correct vote margin. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identifies two policy areas and analyzes how these policy areas reflect ideologies 40.0 pts The student identifies two policy areas and provides analysis of ideology. 32.0 pts The student identifies two policy areas. 20.0 pts The student identifies one policy area. 0.0 pts The student does not identify any policy areas. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA/Sources 10.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards and two additional scholarly sources are provided. 8.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards and one additional scholarly source is provided. 6.0 pts The assignment is referenced and formatted according to APA standards, but has no additional sources. 0.0 pts No APA style or format was used. No sources used. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing 10.0 pts The student presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 8.0 pts The student presents information using understandable language, but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 6.0 pts The student presents information using understandable language but is very disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 0.0 pts The student presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 10.0 pts Total Points: 125.

Why vending machine is not popular in China as other country?it is an opinion writing, explaining the reasons?

Use a minimum of 4 news articles that describe the type of victimization you have selected as your base. Discuss how the primary/direct and secondary victims may be impacted by the victimization Discuss how the media sources you used treated the victim. For example: did the media source focus more on the offender, did the media source alienate or shame the victim, did the media show attention or empathy towards the victim etc. Explain how the media’s portrayal may impact the victim and his/her healing process or road to resilience Discuss how the criminal justice system can positively serve the victims If you were to assemble a victimology research based on the topic and victims you selected: a)what would be that research’s focus be? b)why would that be the focus? c)how would your research benefit the study of victims?

Please answer the following question with a 300-word response. You must also reply to at least one student with a 150-word response. Everyone in the United States accused of a crime that is looking at incarceration is entitled to a defense attorney. Those that cannot afford an attorney are appointed an attorney. These attorneys are either a public defender or a court-appointed counsel. Some defendants choose to represent themselves in their criminal trial? Why would people want to represent themselves in court pro se? Research and discuss any case in the history of the U.S. legal system where the individual represented himself in his own criminal trial. Why did the defendant make this decision? What was the defendant charged with? What was the outcome of the trial? Explain