Law

For your Unit 3 Complete assignment, write a narrative essay (minimum 1200 words) in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least three scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. Quote your sources in APA format. 1.Research the Knapp Commission and conclusions reached.  Do you agree or disagree with their recommendations? 2.Research the Bell, California corruption trial and its results.  What do you think caused this and allowed it to go on?  What recommendations would you endorse and why? 3.Research the topic of “solvability factors” and how they can affect a criminal investigation. Should they be used or not? 4. You are a seasoned police officer, and your beat partner is the subject of a police investigation. You have knowledge of what the officer has done and will be called before the investigation board. Your partner has asked for your help and to make up a story so she can “beat the rap” and continue her career. What do you do and why? How will your partner feel? For more information on Knapp Commission read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knapp_Commission

For your Unit 2 Complete assignment, write a narrative essay (minimum 1200 words) in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least three scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. Quote your sources in APA format. Research Dothard v. Rawlinson and discuss the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.  Do you agree with their reasoning?  Why or Why not? Research the current state of marijuana laws and how these laws can/will affect the hiring of new law enforcement recruits.  Where do you stand on marijuana use prior to law enforcement employment and why? Research police use of force.  From the sources you find, answer this question:  Is force justified by the police and why?  What circumstances led to the police use of force? A citizen who is complaining about speeders on her street has just contacted you.  She wants something done.  You are still talking to her when you see a car traveling at a high rate of speed past you.  You follow and initiate a traffic stop.  When you make contact with the driver, she tells you her gas pedal was stuck, and she was trying to loosen it.  After you obtain her license and check with dispatch on its status, you see that she has no previous violations.  What do you do and why? READ:  https://savantlearningsystems.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337671293/pageid/0 For more information on Dothard v. Rawlinson read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dothard_v._Rawlinson

Ø USING AN ESSAY FORMAT PLEASE READ AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BELOW IN COMPLETE DETAIL. FAILURE TO ANSWER ALL PARTS OF EACH QUESTION WILL RESULT IN A LOSS OF POSSIBLE POINTS AWARDED. THUS, SKIMPY ANSWERS REFLECTING ONLY A FEW SENTENCES WILL BE MARKED AS INCORRECT.Ø ALL PAPERS MUST BE TYPED USING MLA FORMAT.Ø YOU MAY USE YOUR TEXT, SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES, AS WELL AS OTHER SCHOLARLY MATERIAL. ANSWERS SHOULD REFLECT A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF CONCEPTS AND DEMONSTRATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS, NOT A CARBON COPY OF THE TEXTBOOK. ALL MATERIAL USED IN COMPLETION OF THE EXAM MUST BE CITED USING THE MLA FORMAT.Ø PLEASE NOTE- THIS IS AN INDEPENDENT ESSAY EXAM AND MUST BE COMPLETED AS SUCH. SHARING OF TEST ANSWERS IS PROHIBITED. DUPLICATION OF TEST ANSWERS WILL RESULT IN FAILURE AND REPORTED TO DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES!Ø PLEASE TYPE ALL ANSWERS IN MICROSOFT WORD, IN A FONT NO GREATER THAN #12 (TIMES NEW ROMAN) AND SUBMIT WITHIN THE ASSIGNMENT SECTION. DO NOT RETYPE THE QUESTIONS IN YOUR ANSWER.Ø ALL MATERIAL MUST BE TYPED IN A DOUBLE-SPACED FORMAT. COMPLETION OF THIS EXAM WILL REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 3 FULL PAGES OF TYPED MATERIAL. EXAMS SUBMITTED WITH LESS CONTENT AND WITHOUT A WORK CITED PAGE WILL RESULT IN A REDUCTION OF POINTS.ALL ESSAY EXAM PAPERS MUST BE SUBMITTED ONLINE THROUGH THE CANVAS SITE.1.  v PROVIDE A DETAILED DISCUSSION OF THE HISTORY OF JAILS IN THE UNITED STATES.2.v DISCUSS THE ISSUE OF BAIL AND THE RELATIONSHIP THAT BAIL SERVES IN THE COURT PROCESS. v EXPLAIN IN DETAIL THE PROBLEM OF BAIL WHERE IT RELATES TO MINORITIES AND THE POOR. v HOW DOES THE CONCEPT OF BAIL INTERFERE OR ALLOW AN INDIVIDUAL TO EFFECTIVELY FIGHT FOR HIS/ HER FREEDOM?3.  v COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE MEDICAL MODEL WITH THAT OF THE REINTEGRATION MODEL.4.  v DEFINE THE CONCEPT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS AND EXPLAIN THE WAYS IN WHICH IT HAS INFLUENCED CORRECTIONS IN AMERICA TODAY. For more information on Bail read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bail

250 WORD MIN FOR EACH…DUE 12/1! READ CAREFULLY, TOUGH PROF. PAPER #1 Do you believe that deception (i.e., lying, etc.) is a valid and justifiable technical question? Are there evidentiary and /or ethical ramifications by using such a technique? Explain your arguments. PAPER #2 Our text discusses the Brady Doctrine. From your reading, and any additional research, explain whether you agree with its importance or not.  Is it truly unfair if it is not applied?  Support your conclusions.  For more information on Deception read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deception

After reviewing chapter 11 of the E-Text and the Required Resources please discuss the following: Discuss the challenges that law enforcement faces when seizing digital evidence and propose at least two solutions. Discuss the five-paragraph SMEAC that should ideally find a place in any investigation plan. Which one of these do you feel is the most important? Why? For more information on SMEAC read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_paragraph_order

Recently, a U.S. Circuit Court upheld the enforceability of website terms of service (ToS), even though the user did not have to click-through to agree. Read “Second Circuit Scraps District Court’s Denial of Uber’s Motion to Compel Arbitration.” Identify one positive and one negative implication of this finding. Explain which terms you believe are ethically appropriate for such agreements. Explain your position.

Write a one page essay (one full page of text – at least 300 words – or there will be a point deduction) addressing the following question: Does the USA PATRIOT ACT violate civil liberties? You must choose a side and you must explain why or why not. Also, remember to cite all sources – proper footnotes and works cited page (or you’ll receive a grade of 0). Proofread for format and mechanics as well (double space, 12 size font, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc.).

Refer to the JPB Train Derailment Scenario Overview.  Based on the information provided in this document complete the attached ICS-201 form.  Using the priorities listed as guidance, develop, and list at least three (3) additional objectives to help stabilize this incident.  On a separate document, develop a briefing explaining the rationale for the developed objectives (1.5 to 3 pages).

Discuss a current issue that has both legal and ethical ramifications (the right to die varies by state: legal to a felony, ethical; medical marijuana: legal and who can provide; right-to-try laws: more accepted than the right to die and who gets the organ transplant; and whether the reporting of child abuse is legal or ethical). Take a position and provide support for your response. Are there applicable laws to support your answer? (Buchbinder, 1, Chapter 15)

To discuss whether certain behaviors are deviant—that is, straying from an acceptable norm—may imply that there is a clear arbiter of “normal.” But is human society that rigid? Or is society’s perception of “normal” fluid and more like a continuum? If deviant is a malleable term, then so too may be normal—so what would it mean to try to actually eliminate deviance?In this Discussion, you consider the plausibility and implications of eliminating deviance, and perhaps thereby eliminating crime.Post:Is elimination of deviance a necessary, plausible, or ethical pursuit?Is the prevention of crime possible?Respond to two colleagues:Choose a response that is different from your own.Explain how your colleague’s position has changed your perception or understanding.