Literature

—-Please 300 words minimum——–Please Read The Attachments I have Included—This homework asks you to discuss Seek To Be Wise Book.In this discussion prompt we need you answering some of your own critical questions about the things you read and how they’re written.This forum asks you to discuss the book selection  seek to be wise in conjunction with your readers who have not read your title and are instead bringing ideas to share and discuss about their own titles.Please remember:Late, under minimum length, insufficiently proofread, poorly developed or off topic posts will not receive creditPosts that do not directly page cite textual references at least once cannot receive creditPosts cannot be revised or submitted late for creditPosts must satisfy all forum criteria to be considered for credit – partial credit is not given for partial work.The author of your book approaches his/her subject in a certain way, presumably. As every writer does, s/he has certain clear goals in mind when constructing the narrative for us, and that explains why s/he writes in the way that s/he does. Based on how the narrative is constructed and what’s being  said in it, we can safely assume the writer wishes to communicate something important beyond the surface meaning(s) of the work. The story is about “A,” for example, but it’s also about “B,” “C” and/or “D” too, presumably. The ways in which s/he constructs the essay help your author convey all of those different things to us. So:What’s this piece really about, in your estimation, and how do you know that? What’s the “subtext” of meaning running underneath the surface meaning of the narrative? How did you find it? What kinds of specific writing strategies does your author use to approach the subject(s) of the work and the subtextual meaning also?Is the writing serious or humorous or ironic, questioning or emphatic, argumentative or speculative? Is the author a disinterested journalist or a committed participant in the story s/he chronicles?How is the way in which the essay is written connected to what the essay is about? Is the language formal, or colloquial, or something in between? Is the tone of the writing moralistic, political, religious, philosophical? Does the writing have to look and feel a certain way in order to effectively address its particular subjects and topics?Does your author rely on anecdotal evidence for support and illustration, or research and reporting, or first-hand observation, or historical recounting, or philosophical musings, or all of these, or some other specific strategies, and to what effect? Who does the author consider his/her reading audience to be, do you think? How do you know that?How exactly does the author go about telling this story, and does s/he do it well and successfully, or unsuccessfully? Why, and in what ways?Remember to page cite textual references in every post you make, and always be specific and thorough in your reasoning and argument. Although you are not required to address everything in this set of prompt questions, please try to give a considered response that attempts to describe and critically evaluate some of the specific writing strategies the writer uses that you believe are successful and effective, or not, in helping to convey the meaning you believe he/she wishes to convey.

Choose one of the following prompts for your informative essay:Option 1: In a well-written essay, explain how making inferences helps the reader understand the plot of “The Highwayman” by Alfred Noyes. Provide evidence from the text to justify your answer.Option 2: Choose at least two texts from this unit and in a well-written essay, explain how the skill of making inferences helps the reader to understand the plot of the two texts. Provide evidence from the texts to justify your answer.Option 3: In a well-written essay, discuss the elements of gothic literature that are present in one of the texts we read this unit. Explain how those elements contribute to the tone, mood, and theme of the text.

ICSM 10800-04 / Fall 2020 S.A. DelaneyUnit 2: What Do We Mean When We Talk About “Anxiety”? upd. 10/6According to a national survey published in February 2019 by the Pew Research Center, anxiety and depression rank as one of the top concerns for US teenagers. Numerous reports—including this one from Pew—assert that anxiety was on the rise among college students prior to the pandemic, and we know that our current situation has only exacerbated this state. But what do we mean by “anxiety”? What feelings and experiences are encompassed by this term? What does it mean to identify as a person with anxiety? We’ll draw on ideas from disability studies and intersectionality in our conversations. The Unit will conclude with a formal analytical argument of 1200-1500 words worth 20 percent of the overall course grade.What Do You Mean By “A Formal Analytical Argument”?We often use the word “argument” to mean the exchange of strong opinions, and when writing for school, it generally refers to a persuasive essay—one that has a clear thesis statement and relevant supporting evidence. In Unit 1, I pushed you to step away from that thesis-support (e.g., five-paragraph essay) style of writing in order to more fully explore and explain your thinking. The analytical argument I’m asking you to write for Unit 2 will combine these modes to create a richer, more complex essay.What Do You Mean By “Analysis”?In their textbook Writing Analytically David Rosenwasser and Jill Stephen offer this four-part definition of analysis, which is worth quoting at length:1. Analysis seeks to discover what something means. An analytical argument makes claims for how something might be best understood and in what context.2. Analysis deliberately delays evaluation and judgment.3. Analysis begins in and values uncertainty rather than starting from settled convictions.4. Analytical arguments are usually pluralistic; they tend to try on more than one way of thinking abouthow something might be best understood. (Rosenwasser and Stephen 6-7)Analysis, then, starts with inquiry: questions followed by careful observation. To delay evaluation and judgment requires that we acknowledge and bracket our gut reactions—we must stay with the problem longer, seeing it from every possible perspective, considering what may seem counterintuitive. Only then can we arrive at a reasoned, thoughtful conclusion.Who’s Our Audience For This Essay?Beyond the obvious answer—me, your professor—your imagined audience for this essay is the journal Inquiries, which describes itself as “an open-access academic journal that highlights the work of students at the undergraduate level and above.” Consider this assignment an opportunity to prepare a scholarly essay for possible submission to this journal. As part of our activities, we’ll look more closely at the journal’s website and its expectations.What Kind Of Research Will We Have To Do?Your analysis will focus on one specific conversation about anxiety. That conversation may have taken place in a more traditional magazine or newspaper, on social media, on a cable news show, or elsewhere. It needs to be a conversation that you can capture and study in detail. As with your first essay, you may find it necessary to narrow your focus to make your analysis more manageable.How Should I Cite My Sources?You’ll need to use formal MLA citation style for this essay. That means that in addition to including all sources on the Works Cited, you need to fully and formally introduce all of your sources, as we’ve been practicing. Any and all ideas and details should be directly attributed to the appropriate source (“According to political reporter Joe Blow of the New York Times…”). In addition, you’ll want to provide parenthetical in-text citations (or PITCs) as needed.ICSM 10800-04 / Fall 2020S.A. DelaneyWorks CitedHorowitz, Juliana Menasce, and Nikki Graf. “Most U.S. Teens See Anxiety and Depression as a Major Problem Among Their Peers.” Pew Research Center, 2019.Rosenwasser, David, and Jill Stephen. Writing Analytically 6th Ed. Wadsworth/Cengage, 2012.EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR FINAL ESSAY (200 points)1) Does the writer respond to the assignment, composing a thoughtful Analytical Essay of 1200-1500 words?a) Does the writer select and describe a specific representative example of the term “anxiety” in use inrelation to higher education?b) Does the writer analyze the use of this term, identifying assumptions and implications?2) Does the writer use all sources (print, web, or other) ethically and effectively?a) b) c)3) Is a) b) c)4) Is a)b) c)Does the writer formally introduce sources, clearly attributing ideas and quotations? Is there an MLA style Works Cited page?Are parenthetical in-text citations used correctly when needed?the essay well developed and effectively organized?Does the writer include a clear and effectively placed thesis statement?Is the essay organized in a logical, cohesive manner, with helpful transitions? Does the writer employ an effective introduction and conclusion?the essay well prepared?Does the writer follow submission guidelines, such as double-spacing, 12-point font, MLA heading, and title?Is language clear and specific, employing a voice that is natural and appropriate for essay?Are there minimal grammar and punctuation errors?

Epidemiological Methods ExercisePlease from a peer review journals select and download one epidemiological study, attach it as PDF file, carefully read the study, and answer the following questions:1. What was the general aim of the study?2. What was the exposure of interest?3. What was the primary outcome measure?4. What was the original or the achieved hypothesis of the authors?5. What type of study design did they employ?6. Why do you think they chose that study type?7. What advantages and disadvantages does the study type have?8. What potential confounding factors can you identify?9. Describe strengths and weaknesses of the followed study design?10. What are the measurement used in this study?Choose another design to implement the study, explain the justification for the selection and answer all the bellow questions for the new design1. What will the general aim of the new study?2. What is the exposure of interest?3. What are the expected primary outcome measure?4. What will be the original or the expected hypothesis of the authors?5. What procedures for type of study design?6. Why do you chose that study type?7. What advantages and disadvantages does the study type have?8. What potential confounding factors can you identify?9. Describe strengths and weaknesses of the followed study design?10. What are the measurement appropriate in this new study design?

Standard MLA style format Minimum 1200 words, plus works cited page. Works Cited page must be included for a passing grade Besides the literary work(s), at least 2 academic sources researched by student. DO NOT use the following sources: Wikipedia, Sparknotes, Shmoop, GradeSaver, CliffNotes, eNotes, etc. Instead, use the PBSC Library Databases to research scholarly sources and literary criticisms.  Assignment The term paper involves research on literary one of the literary works that was presented, discussed and/or analyzed throughout the semester. Preferably, students will write their term paper on the literary work presented to the class, but they may choose not to with instructor approval. The introductory paragraph should briefly introduce the author, title and brief summary of the literary work and end with a well-formulated thesis that reflects the body paragraph organization. The thesis should summarize the main ideas presented in the topic sentences of the body paragraphs, ending impact of the literary work on culture and society in general.   Body paragraphs (4) should have an explicit topic sentence that presents part of the argument from the thesis. You also must integrate evidence in the form of quote, paraphrase, or summary from the work(s) and from at least one of your outside sources to assist in analyzing and supporting your topic sentence. Last, it should include an analytical discussion explaining how the evidence supports your thesis. Note that the suggested organization reflects the content and organization of the presentation guidelines. BP1 – Author (brief–very brief–biography) if any.   History of the work, when was it written, published, type of publication, who   was targeted audience. Type of literature, genre, etc. Original language?   Medium? Be sure to cite sources. BP2 -Who or what influenced the author/work? Describe  historical, social, political, philosophical, biographical influences. What   is the main theme? Subthemes? Be sure to cite sources. BP3 – Identify the protagonist and antagonist. Describe   the conflict and resolution. Summarize and paraphrase at least two literary criticism perspectives that analyze the work. Be sure to cite sources. BP4 – Who or what has the piece of literature influenced?   Is the work and/or its themes, characters, any passages still influential today? Explain how? The conclusion should NOT simply repeat the thesis, but it should also NOT continue to argue and present more evidence. Instead, it should bring the reader full circle on the importance of your analysis of the work(s) and the points you have argued in the body paragraphs.

Please respond to one of the following prompts (approx. 200 words) by Monday November 30th  1. Does Friday develop as a character?  Provide evidence for your response, then consider what this suggests in terms characterization in 18th century novels and/or attitudes toward “the Other” at the time of publication.

Instructions for Paper 3 Here are the instructions for Paper 3. 1. Read chapter 6 in Gardner very carefully. (One of the sample poems in chapter 6 is by T. S. Eliot. It’s a great poem, but it’s long and complicated. Please don’t choose it for your paper.) 2. Throughout The Gardner text, there are many poems including those on pages 10, 19, 61, 64, 68, 73, and 105. Read all of these poems. In addition I have attached 3 poems to this email. Please read them carefully as they are all suitable for you to write about. I particularly recommend Mother to Son. 3. Paper 3 is in 2 parts. For Part 1, choose 5 poems from the text and the attachments. In 3 or 4 sentences for each poem state why the poem is suitable to teach to a first year college class. Think about subject matter, length for how the poem could be taught in a 50-minute period, language, stylistic devices. Keep your responses to 3 or 4 brief sentences. For Part 2, choose one of your five poems. Write 500 words on why you think it would be a good poem to teach a first year college class, and why you particularly like this poem more than the others. Analyze the poem. What is it about? Who is the speaker? To whom is the speaker speaking? What is the point of view? How is the poem structured? Does the structure reflect the meaning of the poem? What stylistic devices like metaphors are used? What effect do they have? Support everything you say with examples from your chosen poem. The book for the paper is Reading and Writing about Literature 4th edition by Janet E. Gardner and Joanne Diaz.

Discuss the connections between slavery and capitalism in the United States. Also, discuss the effects of the domestic slave trade on African-American subjects. (600-750 words) 2.) using the lectures and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, discuss the similarities and differences between Césaire and canons thoughts (500 words) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/negritude/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frantz-fanon/ 3.) using the lecture and the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, provide three reasons why W.E.B. Dubois is one of the most important African American intellectuals. Also, do you think his concept of double consciousness is still relevant today? (500 words)

Whitman poems we discussed PICK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING Poems to complete the assignment: Crossing Brooklyn Ferry, The Wound-Dresser, or Preface to Leaves of Grass Among the things we have discussed in Walt Whitman’s poetry is his belief that there are shared connections between all people that transcend place and time. For this assignment, choose 1 of the 3 poems we have covered for a closer analysis of one of these things that connect all of us. In 2-3 paragraphs, identify one or more moments within the poem where Whitman talks about something that we all share—an idea, a feeling, a need, an experience, etc. What is one of these fundamental things he says connect us? Do you think his points are valid? Are there moments you might disagree to some degree (or entirely)?

What is the difference between internal and external meaning? Why is it important to get the distinction right?