Literature

Step 1: Check the completeness and appropriateness of the autoethnography by answering these questions: ·      Are all three legs of the stool (memoir, researched argument, and sophisticated reflection) in the paper? ·      Does the paper incorporate four sources from GRC’s databases? ·      Is there a full MLA-style work cited list? Are there in-text citations in MLA style? Do these “match” in the sense that, you can find each author’s work cited on the works cited page AND in an in-text citation? Step 2: As you did Step 2 above, you probably noticed that portions of the paper are stronger & more complete, while others are weaker.  ·      Which leg is almost complete right now, and which is the least complete? How can the author of the paper improve the balance of the paper? ·      Are there any sources whose integration needs more work? Tell us about that opportunity to improve. ·      Is the paper really an autoethnography–does it feel like the two example papers you read for the last module–or is it more like a personal narrative paper with some research thrown in? Please advise your author. Step 3: Review especially the thesis statement and topic sentences. ·      Can you find the narrowed topic + what the author is proving or saying about that (thesis)? Is it placed at the end of the introduction paragraph? ·      Can you find the narrowed subtopic + what the author is proving or saying about each (topic sentence) in the body paragraphs? In particular, are the researched argument paragraph topic sentences solidly analytical? Step 4: As a reader, what did you gain from reading this paper? What did you wish it explained more or pursued in a different way? Step 5: Do you have any overall comments to make about the autoethnography, especially about purpose, audience, genre, impetus, or author (rhetorical situation)?

In a paper 1,000-1,250 words, complete the following: 1. Explain cultural factors that influence the development of ethical relationships in or between cultures. 2. Evaluate the different perspectives on the ethics of developing, maintaining, or ending relationships in members of different cultural groups? 3. Explain how different cultural values and norms may influence conflict styles. 4. Give specific illustrations that show different conflict styles of people from different cultures. 5. The project must have a minimum of five scholarly sources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. This assignment assesses the following competencies: Comp 4.1 Evaluate the connection between ethical communication and different worldviews. Comp 2.3 Compare and contrast how communicative behaviors reflect various cultural norms.

How would you describe your writing confidence before and after this coursework? How does this apply to your work on your final essay?

Write a 1,250-word essay on one of the topics below. You must use at least three outside sources (not including the one listed below and not including your textbook). Cite your sources according to MLA style, and please type in 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch page margins. Follow the formatting instructions on the Essay Reference Guide, and include a Works Cited page at the end with alphabetized entries for your outside sources and your text. Please submit your Thinking Storm tutor’s notes alongside your final draft of Essay #4. Ultimately, there should be two documents in the Assignments folder: your tutor’s draft and your final draft. Biographical: Subject Robert Frost’s “Design” to a biographical reading. Consider its meditations on life, death, and fate (or, alternatively, the natural order of the world) and relate this to details of Frost’s life. How might his upbringing and the events in his life have influenced this poem? What does this poem teach us about Frost’s views on life? Be sure to analyze the symbolism in the poem to uncover more about the meaning of “Design” and the way Frost viewed the world.

This week, you will submit an outline of your final paper. Your submission must include an introduction, a body, and a conclusion in full-sentence, outline format. Each section of your outline should include content regarding the model. Refer to the assignment details above and instructions below, “Week 7 Final paper: Identifying and Resolving Conflict,” for the final paper’s requirements. Week 7: Final Paper: Identifying and Resolving Conflict Instructions Submit a three- to four-page paper including a scenario and analysis, depicting a conflict resolution model from the list below. Include a minimum of three scholarly sources from trade journals found in the WCU Online Library, including at least one scholarly article from a professional journal. All sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted. List of Conflict Models The Circle of Conflict model The Triangle of Satisfaction model The Boundary model The Interests/Rights/Power model The Dynamics of Trust model The Dimensions of Conflict model The Social Styles model Sections to be Included in the paper: Introduction One-sentence scenario summary Relevant model of conflict Preview of paper’s content Scenario Detailed description with setting and events Model Description Conflict resolution model Relevance of the scenario to the course’s context Model Analysis Include at least three of the following items: Potential consequences Resolution options Action plan and strategies for the mediation process Conflict resolution agreement Technical aspects of conflict and potential resolutions Public policy that may be pertinent Summary/conclusions Arguments supported by evidence and reasoning Reference list A minimum of three references from reliable sources; one must be a scholarly, academic article.

Criminal Defense attorney Nicholas Braswell has devoted his career to serving and defending the citizens of the Richmond area and has developed a strong connection with the people and places of eastern Virginia. It takes a unique type of individual to nurture a love of place and to put down strong, healthy roots within a community. In today’s world, there are so many opportunities to live a transient life, to move from place to place and never settle down. However, we all need to feel like part of a community, and so it falls upon certain special people and projects to build that sense of unity and place that we call “home.” As day-to-day life becomes increasingly digital and experiences become increasingly “remote,” discussion about what it takes to build healthy communities becomes more and more important. Nicholas Braswell is proud to sponsor the Strong Roots Scholarship and Essay Contest as a way to promote discussion about the meaning of community in the digital age and as a way to sponsor educational opportunities for individuals who are dedicated to building strong communities where passions and careers can take root. Write a 500-600 word essay that answers the following question: How is the meaning of the word “community” changing in today’s world, and what does that mean for people who wish to build strong, healthy communities?

Instructions from the website: Submit an essay of 800 words answering the following question. What is your best solution for resolution of the student loan debt crisis?

write about the movie hacksaw ridge and what l got out of it it has to be double spaced

Please write many pages that isolates several claims Nigel makes, and explain what arguments he puts forward for those claims, then analyze and evaluate the arguments and make one of your own defending or refuting his position. It is important when developing your own argument that you use clear, concrete examples for me to follow your logic

provide a clear road map general scope of argumentation include 5 relevant quotations from your primary source (against Eratosthenes and the Oeconomicus) include 3 modern scholarly and include a tentative working thesis statement with a sense of evidence. secondary sources (1- the status of women in Athens. Author: Charles seltman. 2- position of women in Classical Athens author: Donald Richter. 3-Lydia 1and the political of Oikos author: Andrew Wolpert) second source: Sarah Pomeroy, goddesses, whores, wife, and slaves. please highlight how Pomeroy thought that Athens marriage was bad. KEEP IN MIND: the Oeconomicus is a manual about finance and estate management not about having a bad marriage. please don’t go with the statement that Athens marriage was horrible