Literature

Woman Hollering Creek” Explain the role Woman Hollering Creek (the actual name of the creek, La Gritona) plays in the story. What does the name of the creek refer to, symbolically? How does the meaning of the “hollering” change over the course of the story for Cleófilas – what does it mean for her when she lives in the town with her husband, and what does it mean at the very end of the story? Again, remember to find relevant quotes from the story that support your answer to this question.

After reading the uploaded file write a response of 275 words to the following question  What is the goal of a classroom inquiry dialogue?

After reading Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” and Kate Chopin’s “The Storm” and “The Story of an Hour,” do you notice any common themes? What are they? What do the stories have in common and how are they different? (350 words) Essay type the times new ROMAN 12 font . Please watch the video and from use the information in the essay.Thank you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUtWKOCfPyM&feature=youtu.be

You will be using the short story titled Araby by James Joyce to answer all 9 questions. All answers should be one paragraph long to questions 1-8 For question 9, you have to write one full page to answer the question Make sure to number the answers to the corresponding question These are the questions: 1. Identify the protagonist, describe his/her life situation and basic personality, and then state his/her problem and/or primary motivation. What is the central idea, need, or problem that drives the protagonist? How does the protagonist change by the end of the story? What have they learned? 2. Identify the antagonist, describe his/her/its basic situation and qualities,and then state his/her/its main motivation. What is the central idea, need, or problem that drives the antagonist? Finally, explain how this drive interacts with the protagonist’s motivation, thus establishing the central conflict of the work. 3. Summarize the plot. Include enough of the deeper level to show all that’s at stake for the protagonist and to suggest how he/she does or doesn’t change by the end of the work. 4. Describe the main conflict. What is at stake? What are people fighting over? What is the problem? Remember that there is always a problem in literature. The human condition—the subject of all literature—is about problems. 5. Identify the moments of crisis, or scenes, that lead up to the climax. Describe each scene/chapter in a couple of words, then briefly chart the “rising” conflict of the work.     6. Describe the importance of setting (place) in the work you are analyzing. 7. Write on the connotation of important images, metaphors or symbols in the work. How does this connotation enrich your understanding of the work as a whole? 8. Write on important historical or cultural information that might enrich your understanding of the work. Connect the historical or cultural information to the development of the story. 9. Write one full page about the themes. What world or life view is the author expressing? How do you know? What is his/her message? Do you think the author did a good job delivering his/her world view? Its not letting me add the story to the file section but if you search up the short story on google you will find pdfs online

https://guides.nyu.edu/c.php?g=276826&p=1846154 https://nau.edu/undergraduate-research/undergraduate-symposium-registration-process/ How to Design Your Nature of Science Poster What should be on my poster? Your poster should be split into 4 parts and look something like the example at the right. What should be covered in my Background section? This is where you want to grab our attention Describe this topic and make it interesting How many sources should I have and what should they be? You should have (at least) 4 sources – 1 for each panel of your poster At least one of your sources should contain data Briefly summarize each source (one or two sentences) Use your Baloney Detection Kit to decide if the source is a science source or a non-science source Cite each source at the bottom of its panel What should my Conclusion contain? Identify the topic as science, proto-science, non-science or pseudo-science Explain your choice using your Baloney Detection Kit Discuss any relevant cognitive biases How do I make a good poster? Review resources used in the reading assignment Once your poster is created, review this checklist or ask a classmate to review for you! Topics for Nature of Science Poster Animals detecting earthquakes   Applied Kinesiology   Aromatherapy   Biorhythms   Cell phones causing cancer   Cold fusion as an energy source   Himalayan salt lamps   Does Planet X exist?   Dousing for water   Ear candling   Feng Shui   Green coffee bean extract for weight loss   Hypnosis to quit smoking   Is yawning contagious?   Laundry Balls   Learning a foreign language in your sleep   Magnet Therapy   Ozone: Protector or Carcinogen?   Playing classical music to unborn children to enhance their intelligence   Polygraphy   Reflexology   Swearing reducing pain   The use of Graphology in court cases   Therapeutic Touch   Alkaline water

Copy and paste these questions into your response window and respond in a different color, please. Answer in complete sentences, and proofread for errors in comma usage (including comma splices!) 1. At the beginning of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson lays out the inalienable rights given all “men.” These rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness lay the groundwork for many of the struggles in America from emancipation to women’s suffrage.  According to this introduction, what is the purpose of all government? Type your reply here 2. In the preamble, what phrase establishes the purpose and vision of this new government? 3. Choose one of the amendments from the Bill of Rights other than the first or second (everyone knows those). Explain how or when you have seen the application of one of those amendments in the news or your life. 4. Personal response: How do you reconcile with the memory of Thomas Jefferson and others? The greatness of their thinking not only built this nation, but their words also continue to help us fight for greater equity today (see the equal protection clause). But these were flawed men, many of whom owned slaves. Do we appreciate the work but condemn the men? Do we argue they were simply men of their time? Do we acknowledge the complexity of people as both good and bad, or is that too simplistic. Let me know what you think. First person is o.k. here.

Reflect on the Orpheus and Eurydice myth and its reception. Some questions to consider (you do not have to address all or even any of these): Are there certain themes/motifs that appear in both the original myths and all works of reception? If so, what are they? Why do you think this myth relates to these themes/motifs so strongly? In what type of works has the Orpheus and Eurydice myth been used?  Why these works in particular? We have studied three different women-authored works that treat the original myth very differently. Are there any similarities among all of the works of reception? If so, what are they and why? If not, why do you think that is? What is each author trying to accomplish in their work of reception? Are they simply retelling an old myth for a modern audience? Are they using familiar stories to ground unfamiliar perspectives? Really think through what the goal of each of these works of reception is, how each author is using the myth, and the degree to which you think their engagement with the myth is effective or applicable. Why did they choose this specific myth?  Can you think of any other ways in which the Orpheus and Eurydice myth has been used? If so, what?

Overview These week you read 3 additional literacy narratives:amy tan, Sherman Alexie, Gloria Anzaldua In a thoughtful and rigorous response, I would like you to: (paragraph 1): find similar ideas and themes among these three narratives. What do they have in common? Refer specifically to each narrative. https://english.washington.edu/sites/english/files/documents/ewp/teaching_resources/anzaldua_how_to_tame_a_wild_tongue.pdf http://www.umsl.edu/~alexanderjm/Mother%20Tongue%20by%20Tan.pdf https://www.umsl.edu/~alexanderjm/SupermanandMebyAlexie.pdf

Compare and contrast the position of Devettere in chapter 3 on “Intentionally Causing Death and Letting Die,” and Kelly’s treatment of “Forgoing Treatment, Pillar Two: Killing and Allowing to Die,” found in chapter 14 of his text. Also, compare and contrast the position of Devettere on the use of the ordinary/extraordinary means in preserving life with that of Kelly in chapter 13 of his text. How has Kelly helped you understand the application of each distinction in medical ethics?

You should definitely begin your paper with a short summary of the play before moving into a description of your response TO the play. Make a list of five or six specific words, images, or moments that caught your attention while you were reading. Answer one of the following questions: Did any of the words, images, or moments you listed contribute to your enjoyment or loathing of the play? Did any of them seem to add to or detract from any overall theme that the play may have had? Did any of them make you think of something completely different and wholly irrelevant to the play? If so, what connection might there be? Write a few sentences about how each of the items you picked out for the second question affected you and/or the play. Your response should clearly articulate how you felt about the play and how the play made you feel. It should also answer the following questions: Who and/or what was the subject of this play? What was the major theme or themes of this play? What if any point of view did the author have on the major theme of the play? Did you agree or not with the author’s point of view?