Medicine

A total of six(6) critiques from researched articles are due using the following Topics: You are able to find these articles from journals in the library, magazines, educational databases, (exa. EBSCO Host) which can be located on the Alcorn State University home page) and credible search engines. 1. Cardiovascular Disease: (2 critiques). 2. Psychological Diseases (2 critiques). 3. Communicable and/or non-communicable infectious diseases: (2 critiques). Please follow this critique rubric as follows: I. General Summary— When writing a general summary, you will briefly summarize the article in abstract form. II. Medical Interventions—You will respond to what modern medical interventions are concerning your article. (Forex: If you have high blood pressure, the doctor will prescribe you prescription drugs like Lasix, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, etc. that you only can get by prescription from a doctor). Note: If the Medical Interventions are not in your article, you must research to find the interventions. There is no such thing as “It is not one or I can’t find it”. There are medical interventions for every ailment. III. Natural “Organic Interventions—You will respond to what alternative interventions are or what you can do naturally without using drugs and surgery “Home Remedy” to correct given situations according to what your article is about. Note: If the Natural Interventions are not in your article, you must research to find the interventions. There is no such thing as “It is not one or I can’t find it”. There are natural interventions for about 90% of every ailment. IV. Reflective Summary— What are your personal feelings toward each critique? This should be expressed in your words strictly from your reflection. Please be sure to use your opinion by using credible statements.

https://www.videogie.org/content/authorinfo#sub https://www.videogie.org/400.jsp please rewrite the paper follow the requirements in the link above. this is to be published to the journal above 1. rewrite/ revision, add the content in the history and surgery documents to make it more complete. Please use medical terminology to describe it. You can read the samples sent to you (please remind me to send you later) for related formats and expressions. In addition, just look at the case report published in the above magazine I sent you, see how this magazine writes, and rewrite according to the articles published in the magazine. 2. the first 3 references need to be updated (the first 3 in the reference page, they were in 2017. it’s been 3 years already since the paper was written in 2017 and then it was left undone till now). Also need to update the related contents in the discussion part.   3. Refer to the guide, which requires no more than 10 references.   4. I have chosen 4 pictures myself. You can see which pictures are better to put in the paper. it must include information about endoscopy and images. you can have 4-6 pictures? double-check the guide to see if there is any restriction. There are restrictions on image and video formats and pixels, which need to be rewritten as required by the magazine 5. format: each magazine has its own format. please refer to this magazine articles and guide.

This is for a Masters’s level dissertation. Thesis: Do we have a moral obligation to be vaccinated? I want to focus on an individual moral obligation to be vaccinated in order to both minimize the risk of harming others (through direct infection) and to contribute to the realization of a collective, public good: ‘herd immunity’. The second reason is based on a principle of fairness in the distribution of the burdens required to realize the collective good, that is, herd immunity. I want to argue that there is an individual moral obligation to be vaccinated regardless of whether herd immunity is realized or not, based on a principle of fairness in the distribution of risks and burdens. Moreover, there is a moral obligation to be vaccinated regardless of whether an individual’s vaccination makes a significant difference /contribution to the realization of herd immunity.  I want to focus on whether a deontological framework (in particular Scanlon’s contractualism) generates/supports a moral obligation to be vaccinated.  The structure should be: Abstract  Introduction  Background, issue:  Main argument and thesis: we do have an obligation to be vaccinated Opposing view: we do not have an obligation to be vaccinated Counter argument Conclusion

A total of six(6) critiques from researched articles are due using the following Topics: You are able to find these articles from journals in the library, magazines, educational databases, (exa. EBSCO Host) which can be located on the Alcorn State University home page) and credible search engines. 1. Cardiovascular Disease: (2 critiques). 2. Psychological Diseases (2 critiques). 3. Communicable and/or non-communicable infectious diseases: (2 critiques). Please follow this critique rubric as follows: I. General Summary— When writing a general summary, you will briefly summarize the article in abstract form. II. Medical Interventions—You will respond to what modern medical interventions are concerning your article. (Forex: If you have high blood pressure, the doctor will prescribe you prescription drugs like Lasix, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, etc. that you only can get by prescription from a doctor). Note: If the Medical Interventions are not in your article, you must research to find the interventions. There is no such thing as “It is not one or I can’t find it”. There are medical interventions for every ailment. III. Natural “Organic Interventions—You will respond to what alternative interventions are or what you can do naturally without using drugs and surgery “Home Remedy” to correct given situations according to what your article is about. Note: If the Natural Interventions are not in your article, you must research to find the interventions. There is no such thing as “It is not one or I can’t find it”. There are natural interventions for about 90% of every ailment. IV. Reflective Summary— What are your personal feelings toward each critique? This should be expressed in your words strictly from your reflection. Please be sure to use your opinion by using credible statements.

Mandatory Readings: – E-book – Gonzales (2017) “Traditional Indian Medicine: American Indian Wellness” … (Section 3 – “Healing & Self Governance?”) pages 240-266 Take notes on the readings about the concepts, terms, and information you consider important. – Articles on D2L week 3 – Take Notes i. Walter et.al. (2011) Bodies don’t just tell stories they tell histories… ii. Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart et.al. (2011) Historical Trauma Among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas: Concepts, Research, and Clinical Considerations iii. Warne & Lajimodiere (2015) American Indian health disparities psychosocial influences View the following videos and post a reflection making a clear connection between the readings and the content presented in all the videos: a) “The Canary Effect” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD7x6jryoS b) “Standing Rock Documentary: Who, What and Why of the DAPL Protests” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8oEi4RkCKE

https://www.videogie.org/content/authorinfo#sub https://www.videogie.org/400.jsp please rewrite the paper follow the requirements in the link above. this is to be published to the journal above 1. rewrite/ revision, add the content in the history and surgery documents to make it more complete. Please use medical terminology to describe it. You can read the samples sent to you (please remind me to send you later) for related formats and expressions. In addition, just look at the case report published in the above magazine I sent you, see how this magazine writes, and rewrite according to the articles published in the magazine. 2. the first 3 references need to be updated (the first 3 in the reference page, they were in 2017. it’s been 3 years already since the paper was written in 2017 and then it was left undone till now). Also need to update the related contents in the discussion part.   3. Refer to the guide, which requires no more than 10 references.   4. I have chosen 4 pictures myself. You can see which pictures are better to put in the paper. it must include information about endoscopy and images. you can have 4-6 pictures? double check the guide to see if there is any restriction. There are restrictions on image and video formats and pixels, which need to be rewritten as required by the magazine 5. format: each magazine has their own format. please refer to this magazine articles and guide

The unapproved use of approved drugs, also called off-label use, with children is quite common. This is because pediatric dosage guidelines are typically unavailable since very few drugs have been specifically researched and tested with children. When treating children, prescribers often adjust dosages approved for adults to accommodate a child’s weight. However, children are not just “smaller” adults. Adults and children process and respond to drugs differently in their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion.   Children even respond differently during stages from infancy to adolescence. This poses potential safety concerns when prescribing drugs to pediatric patients. As an advanced practice nurse, you have to be aware of the safety implications of the off-label use of drugs with this patient group. To Prepare Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics. Write a 1-page narrative in APA format that addresses the following: Explain the circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Be specific and provide examples. Describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.

https://www.videogie.org/content/authorinfo#sub https://www.videogie.org/400.jsp please rewrite the paper follow the requirements in the link above. this is to be published to the journal above 1. rewrite/ revision, add the content in the history and surgery documents to make it more complete. Please use medical terminology to describe it. You can read the samples sent to you (please remind me to send you later) for related formats and expressions. In addition, just look at the case report published in the above magazine I sent you, see how this magazine writes, and rewrite according to the articles published in the magazine. 2. the first 3 references need to be updated (the first 3 in the reference page, they were in 2017. it’s been 3 years already since the paper was written in 2017 and then it was left undone till now). Also need to update the related contents in the discussion part.   3. Refer to the guide, which requires no more than 10 references.   4. I have chosen 4 pictures myself. You can see which pictures are better to put in the paper. it must include information about endoscopy and images. you can have 4-6 pictures? double-check the guide to see if there is any restriction. There are restrictions on image and video formats and pixels, which need to be rewritten as required by the magazine 5. format: each magazine has its own format. please refer to this magazine articles and guide.

What issues could arise from the physician-patient relationship if the physician is treating his or her own family members? If you were a physician, would you want to treat a family member? Why, or why not? What do you think is the greatest public duty that a physician should report (e.g., communicable illnesses or diseases, abuse, certain injuries, etc.)? Why is it important?

Option 1: The first option is to name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what an utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently). Option 2: In the second option, name and describe in detail a key specific and recent social technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your moral approach to what an utilitarian and social contract ethicist would say (each independently). Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels.  Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die.  Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.  All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan’s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation. Who should get the kidney?  Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms  of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case.