philosophy

https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/descartes1641.pdf1. What is the first thing/person Descartes proves the existence of? Why is this certain?2. What is Descartes’ answer to the question, what kind of thing am I?3. How is a thinking thing different from the wax he describes? 4. At the end of Meditation II has Descartes established that he has a body? Meditation III 1. What three sources of ideas does Descartes mention?2. What does Descartes say about the idea of God? What is the efficient cause of the idea of God?3. How does Descartes answer the question, “from what source would I have derived my existence?”

Finding an article about Anti-abortion laws and write a polemic article.

hi, this assignment does not require any sources from outside but grades will be given on how best lecture material have been used and if you have to cite lecture material then used as (Browne,Pg) . I have attached lecture material and instructions . please carefully read the instructions , assignment is based on topic 1 not on topic 2. It should be written in full grammatical sentences. please clearly mention thesis statement in the begining of assignment and then use arguments either to support it or not.

Assignment Questions In this comparison/contrast essay, Use examples from the text readings to support your points. Question: Kant’s Copernican Revolution in Thought: How did this revolution in thought differ from the traditional view of knowledge of the time? How did Kant’s discovery of the synthetic a priori aid and support his Transcendental Idealism? In what ways does his account of sensible intuition and categories (concepts) of the understanding support his position about the structure and content human knowledge? What is his distinction between phenomena and noumena and how do they support his position about the limits of human understanding & what we can know? What implications would the ideas of pure reason concerning God, World, and Soul have for Kant’s view of metaphysics.

Write a paper in which you compare and contrast the design arguments of Aquinas and Paley. The papers for reading are attached to this. You must read Thomas Aquinas pages 1-8 and Paley pages 46-55. A good paper should address the following points: Compare and contrast the explananda (the features X) of each argument by identifying why each requires an explanation beyond the laws or processes of nature. Discuss the analogies used by Aquinas (the archer) and by Paley (the watchmaker). Do these analogies present different kinds or ways of being a designer? If so, why? If not, why not? Evaluate the reasons given by Paley and Aquinas respectively for why each one’s respective feature X could not happen by chance. Are either susceptible to objections from scientists (like Carroll and Dawkins) that these features do plausibly arise by chance? Instructions Length: Minimum of 500 words. Formatting Requirements: Double spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman, 1 inch margins Citations: Chicago Manuel of Style. You may use footnotes or parenthetical citations .

Read the essay at the link, and then in one file answer the 20 questions. please read the attachment I have upload. you do not have to write a separate document,you just have to fill the answer in the logical exam template I have upload At the end of every question,you can see a Review instruction,if you have difficulty to answer any questions,you can read the E-book I have upload. please write this assignment as a second language student.

Is it morally permissible to believe in God just because it is to your practical advantage to believe? Why or why not? Use the material in Vaughn’s book to help you explain how Pascal argues for belief in God. Explain the strengths and weaknesses of other thinkers have identified in his reasoning. What does the argument against believing in God without sufficient evidence look like? Is it plausible that God would look kindly on atheists and agnostics to because they refuse to believe without evidence? After all, aren’t they simply using God’s gift of reason to arrive at their decision? 8-10 paragraphs using the books as the only resource. The book is called Philosophy Here and Now by Vaughn

Explain Hume’s view on art and the standard of taste. Do you agree with Hume that some people are more keenly attuned to art objects and that their aesthetic sensibilities are more “delicate”? Or, is he just being a snob?

In this paper, you will make a philosophical argument on a topic of your choice that is related to medical ethics. Have examples to support your argument and have two citations where you get it from. 1) https://pged.org/what-is-genetic-discrimination/ 2)http://www.geneticalliance.org/advocacy/policyissues/geneticdiscrimination You can pick any other websites if these two not given enough explanation or argue

Answer these questions in a minimum of 800 words: What counts as cheating? Begin by explaining why there is a serious and significant question here. Then, consider and explain the view that ‘chatting isn’t cheating’. Do you agree? If not, explain why not. Then consider and defend your view of where the line should be. How might someone object to your view, and how would you reply? If you agree that chatting isn’t cheating, then explain the most serious objection and reply to it. I will attach the article for “Chatting Is Not Cheating” so that you may read it.