philosophy

Excerpt from the Introduction: 1. The introduction starts with an anecdote (told by Plato) about Phaedrus going for a walk outside the city walls and running into Socrates. Nedra Reynolds uses this anecdote to make a few different points about the importance of place and space and the connections between place/space and memory/learning/writing. Pick at least one major idea from this section (that is, the first 1.5 pages of the document) and explain in your own words. At least 100 words. 2. Pick any other idea from the introduction and try to make connections to the reading from Friday (“Composition’s Imagined Geographies”). Write at least 50 words. Excerpt from Ch. 43. Reynolds argues in this section that “Of all cultural locations, the street is perhaps the most contested, the most up for grabs, and the most provocative.” What do you think she means? Why does she talk so much about the street? Use examples from this section. 4. According to Reynolds, many composition teachers want their students to go out into the streets to learn about their communities, encounter difference, and grow from these experiences — what is the danger of this approach? What must teachers be careful of? LINK TO READING: https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/77311/files/11904888/preview?verifier=zrfSlZww9Fm4aU8geuIJSZswNy5kdYTv3zKwm623

St. Augustine in the 5th Century held that we are free to make choices in life. This is the idea of free will. It may seem at first glance odd for a religious thinker to say that we have free will. After all, if God exists, then God created all things. God knows already what we will do. God can cause anything to occur. If we cause things to occur, that seems to be a limitation on the power of God and not make God all-powerful. There are also religious traditions that say that we have no free will. There are some theologians in Islam who seem to suggest that is true. In order for this line of reasoning to hold true, one would need to believe free will is an illusion and that we have no control over how we live our lives, but rather that we are puppets moving and acting due to God’s will and the powers of destiny and fate. And if this then in the case, how can we possibly be responsible for our actions? The considerations above show us to what degree our religious beliefs can shape us. For instance, someone who believes in free will may experience way more guilt than someone who believes we don’t have free will and thus isn’t responsible for the choices (and consequences) of the actions we take. Personal struggles with religion and ethics occur in many places, including in the healthcare arena. Consider the following: You are a nurse in a hospital. A 12-year-old was brought to the hospital by an ambulance. The parents have just arrived at the hospital. This 12-year-old has lost a large amount of blood and requires a transfusion. The parents happen to be members of a religion that believes that blood transfusions are immoral. They want to remove the child from the hospital and prevent the transfusion even if it means the death of the child. You have to decide whether or not you will participate in an action that violates the will of the parents and aid in providing blood for the child. If you choose to participate, and even if you are able to legally justify it, you have to think about the distress you are creating for the parents. If you refuse to aid here, you may be subject to retaliation from the hospital. What is the moral thing for the nurse to do here? Questions to answer: What would a divine command ethicist say is the moral thing to do here? Why would they say that? Do you agree with the divine command ethics? Why or why not? Evaluate what a natural law ethicist would say is right to do. Do you agree with them? Why or why not? Given what you said are the right things to do, what would an emotivist say about your positions and judgments? What role does subjectivity play here in determining what is ethical?

Write a 3-4 page paper describing the philosophy of kaizen and kaizen Blitz (Kaikaku). Explain in detail how they can be implemented in a lean manufacturing/service environment. Support your paper with real examples. A minimum of 5 scholarly resources is required. References must be from peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals, books, and reliable online sources. The paper will be evaluated for completeness, scientific accuracy, adherence to the topic, correctness, and quality of works cited, and presentation (readability, grammar, and spelling). References should follow the American Psychological Association Publication Association style 

why Tesla is the best car company in the world

? Instructions Read the assigned reading from the chapter. Then choose ONE of the questions below to answer. Answer the question you chose in a response that is a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs. Be sure to explain your answers and give reasons for your views. You should cite the textbook and use brief quotations and summaries from the textbook in your response. Do NOT use any other sources besides the textbook. 1. What is the philosophical method? Have you used it? How? 2. What are some fundamental beliefs that are part of your philosophy of life? How do these beliefs influence your life? 3. Which of the four main divisions of philosophy interests you the most? What philosophical questions listed in this section (p. 6) would you most want to have answers to and why?Note: All journal entries must be submitted from a computer (not a mobile device) as attachments (in Microsoft Word format) in order to generate an originality report. Book Title: Philosophy Here and Now: Powerful Ideas in Everyday LifeEdition: Third (3rd)Author: Lewis Vaughn Publisher: Oxford University PressCopyright: 2018ISBN: 978-0-19-085234-4If you need something from the textbook let me know.

Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to summarize the argument of an article. The goal is to provide a clear and cohesive summary of an argument, identifying the main ideas and any counter-arguments, along with the author’s responses. Length: approximately 300 words Evaluation: students will be assess based on the following criteria Writing clarity (4.5 marks) Accuracy of summary (7.5 marks) Appropriate citations (3 marks) List of possible articles to choose from: Alistair Norcross “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” Peter Caruthers “Against the Moral Standing of Animals” Monica Aufrecht “Climate Change and Structural Emissions: Moral Obligations at the Individual Level” Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” Peter Singer “Equality for Animals” Written part 2 Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to form your own judgments about the arguments and claims of authors in the articles you are reading. You will select an article from a list supplied and construct an analysis of the argument, providing reasons for your agreement and disagreement with claims in the article. Due: Length: 400 words. Evaluation: Students will be assessed on the following criteria Writing clarity (1.5 marks) Evidence for claims (6 marks) Critical thought in the analysis (6 marks) Appropriate Citation (1.5 marks) List of Possible articles: Arne Naess “Platform Principles of the Deep Ecology Movement” Naomi Klein “This Changes Everything” Pierre Trudeau “Justice in our Time.” The Royal Commission on Aboriginal People “Partners in Confederation: Aboriginal Peoples, Self Government and the Constitution” John Arthur “Famine Relief and Ideal Moral Code” Susan Moller Okin “Is Multicultural Bad for Women?” Michael McDonald “Aboriginal Rights.” Written part 3 Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to apply a concept or an approach that is used in an article to a topic that is not directly addressed in the article. You will take an argument or concept and use it to examine an issue from a list of possible topics that are supplied. Length: 600 words Evaluation: students will be assessed on the following criteria Writing clarity (2 marks) Evidence for claims (8 marks) Critical thought in application (8 marks) Appropriate citation (2 marks) List of possible articles Celia Wolf-Devine “Abortion and the ‘Feminine Voice’” Don Marquis “An Argument that Abortion is Wrong” L.W. Sumner ‘In Harm’s Way” Mary Ellen Turpel “Aboriginal Peoples and the Canadian Charter” Richard Norman “The Case for Pacifism” Joseph Kunkel “Challenging the Domestic Analogy: A Critique of Killing in Self-Defence” Francois Baylis “Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative”

Read the assigned reading from the chapter. Then choose ONE of the questions below to answer. Answer the question you chose in a response that is a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs. Be sure to explain your answers and give reasons for your views. You should cite the textbook and use brief quotations and summaries from the textbook in your response. Do NOT use any other sources besides the textbook. 1. Socrates said to his jurors, “Are you not ashamed that, while you take care to acquire as much wealth as possible, with honor and glory as well, yet you take no care or thought for understanding truth, or for the best possible state of your soul?”  Do you agree with this attitude?   Why or why not? 2. Choose one of your fundamental beliefs that you have not thought much about and write an argument defending it or rejecting it.  Be careful not to use any logical fallacies. Book Title: Philosophy Here and Now: Powerful Ideas in Everyday Life Edition: Third (3rd)Author: Lewis VaughnPublisher: Oxford University PressCopyright: 2018ISBN: 978-0-19-085234-if you need something from the textbook let me know.

(My topic is on Racism and the two philosophers that I would be applying in the paper, would be Saint Augustine and Plato and how would they address racism) The outline of your final project should contain your thesis statement, and the remainder should be a full-sentence outline where you specifically show how your paper will flow. Note: A full-sentence outline differs from bullet points because each section of the outline must be a complete sentence. Each part may only have one sentence in it. Capital letters are ideas that support the thesis. Your outline must contain a minimum of 12 full sentences as follows. The thesis statement of the paper (2 sentences minimum)4 key points to support the thesis statement: What is the issue and why is it significant?  (Racism) (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would your first philosopher address your issue? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would your second philosopher address your issue? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)How would you apply your philosophers’ principles to your issue in modern society? (2 full sentences minimum to clarify this point)Conclusion (2 sentences minimum)

What are your concerns about what’s happening in the U.S. today? (big picture and specific example) What interests you about Modern Philosophy? What are your hopes for it to serve you and us? [Minimum: 10 sentences, maximum: 15 sentences. Be as detailed and revealing as you can in this brief introduction. Revealing means making interesting or meaningful information known, especially about one’s attitude or character.

(1) What does Euthyphro first propose as a definition of piety or holiness?  (2) In responding to Socrates, Euthyphro amends his definition of piety or holiness. How?  (3) Socrates then asks another question of Euthyphro. What is it?  (This question is known as Euthyphro’s Dilemma.) (4) Why is Euthyphro confused (or enlightened) at the end of the dialogue? (5) What is your reflection on this reading?