philosophy

why Tesla is the best car company in the world

Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to summarize the argument of an article. The goal is to provide a clear and cohesive summary of an argument, identifying the main ideas and any counter-arguments, along with the author’s responses. Length: approximately 300 words Evaluation: students will be assess based on the following criteria Writing clarity (4.5 marks) Accuracy of summary (7.5 marks) Appropriate citations (3 marks) List of possible articles to choose from: Alistair Norcross “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” Peter Caruthers “Against the Moral Standing of Animals” Monica Aufrecht “Climate Change and Structural Emissions: Moral Obligations at the Individual Level” Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” Peter Singer “Equality for Animals” Written part 2 Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to form your own judgments about the arguments and claims of authors in the articles you are reading. You will select an article from a list supplied and construct an analysis of the argument, providing reasons for your agreement and disagreement with claims in the article. Due: Length: 400 words. Evaluation: Students will be assessed on the following criteria Writing clarity (1.5 marks) Evidence for claims (6 marks) Critical thought in the analysis (6 marks) Appropriate Citation (1.5 marks) List of Possible articles: Arne Naess “Platform Principles of the Deep Ecology Movement” Naomi Klein “This Changes Everything” Pierre Trudeau “Justice in our Time.” The Royal Commission on Aboriginal People “Partners in Confederation: Aboriginal Peoples, Self Government and the Constitution” John Arthur “Famine Relief and Ideal Moral Code” Susan Moller Okin “Is Multicultural Bad for Women?” Michael McDonald “Aboriginal Rights.” Written part 3 Learning objective: You will practice and learn how to apply a concept or an approach that is used in an article to a topic that is not directly addressed in the article. You will take an argument or concept and use it to examine an issue from a list of possible topics that are supplied. Length: 600 words Evaluation: students will be assessed on the following criteria Writing clarity (2 marks) Evidence for claims (8 marks) Critical thought in application (8 marks) Appropriate citation (2 marks) List of possible articles Celia Wolf-Devine “Abortion and the ‘Feminine Voice’” Don Marquis “An Argument that Abortion is Wrong” L.W. Sumner ‘In Harm’s Way” Mary Ellen Turpel “Aboriginal Peoples and the Canadian Charter” Richard Norman “The Case for Pacifism” Joseph Kunkel “Challenging the Domestic Analogy: A Critique of Killing in Self-Defence” Francois Baylis “Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative”

I need some assistance with these assignment. women philosophy Thank you in advance for the help! Short Essay Philosophy: Women Philosophy At the beginning of the part four of the dis Descartes explained his position concerning the omissions he had made when trying to explain the three kinds of primordial notions, namely. body, soul and the union existing between the body and the soul. He said that we cannot recognize the above three notions by way of comparing with one another (Women Philosophers, PP 18). Hence he felt that he must have stated the difference that subsists among the soul along with its functions, body, the union of the two and the means with which all these three notions become immediately obvious. He affirmed that although the soul is conceived as a material, it is distinctly separate from it (Women Philosophers, PP 18). The major difference among the three kinds of notions lies in the fact that the soul can be recognized by pure understanding alone whilst the body can be recognized by understanding assisted by imagination. But the matters that are relevant to the union of the body and the soul can be recognized only ambiguously by understanding or imagination (Women Philosophers, PP 19). They are known to the senses evidently. Hence those who solely rely on their senses consider the body and the soul as one single thing and believe that the body acts upon the soul. Descartes feels that the metaphysical thoughts that employ pure understanding make the notion of the soul clear to us (Women Philosophers, PP 19). Whereas one can conjure up the notion of the union of soul and body by availing oneself to life and simple conversations and refraining from meditating and studying matters which implement imagination (Women Philosophers , PP 19). There are some logical errors made by Descartes here. He himself admits that human mind is not capable of conceiving soul and body. At the same time he explains it is possible to understand the union through senses. In my opinion senses borrow their existence from mind. Without the aid of mind the senses cannot function. Hence even senses cannot conceive the union. Also I disagree with Descartes’ discovery that everything we conceive very clearly and very distinctively is true. Even in our dreams we conceive things very clearly and distinctively only to find when we wake up that they are nothing but the creations of our own mind. In the same way the waking reality can also be negated in our dream. For instance, if a beggar dreams to be a king, he would not agree if someone comes in his dream and says that he is actually a beggar. Another obscurity is that the word ‘soul’ is not defined clearly. Does soul include mind and the very person who tries to understand the notion of the union? Descartes agrees that the union is evident. But he must have tried to establish the fact whether it can be communicable. Works Cited Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. PP 18 -19. Ed. Margret Atherton. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994. Print.

Read the assigned reading from the chapter. Then choose ONE of the questions below to answer. Answer the question you chose in a response that is a minimum of 1-2 paragraphs. Be sure to explain your answers and give reasons for your views. You should cite the textbook and use brief quotations and summaries from the textbook in your response. Do NOT use any other sources besides the textbook. 1. Socrates said to his jurors, “Are you not ashamed that, while you take care to acquire as much wealth as possible, with honor and glory as well, yet you take no care or thought for understanding truth, or for the best possible state of your soul?”  Do you agree with this attitude?   Why or why not? 2. Choose one of your fundamental beliefs that you have not thought much about and write an argument defending it or rejecting it.  Be careful not to use any logical fallacies. Book Title: Philosophy Here and Now: Powerful Ideas in Everyday Life Edition: Third (3rd)Author: Lewis VaughnPublisher: Oxford University PressCopyright: 2018ISBN: 978-0-19-085234-if you need something from the textbook let me know.

Write a 3-4 page paper describing the philosophy of kaizen and kaizen Blitz (Kaikaku). Explain in detail how they can be implemented in a lean manufacturing/service environment. Support your paper with real examples. A minimum of 5 scholarly resources is required. References must be from peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals, books, and reliable online sources. The paper will be evaluated for completeness, scientific accuracy, adherence to the topic, correctness, and quality of works cited, and presentation (readability, grammar, and spelling). References should follow the American Psychological Association Publication Association style 

Excerpt from the Introduction: 1. The introduction starts with an anecdote (told by Plato) about Phaedrus going for a walk outside the city walls and running into Socrates. Nedra Reynolds uses this anecdote to make a few different points about the importance of place and space and the connections between place/space and memory/learning/writing. Pick at least one major idea from this section (that is, the first 1.5 pages of the document) and explain in your own words. At least 100 words. 2. Pick any other idea from the introduction and try to make connections to the reading from Friday (“Composition’s Imagined Geographies”). Write at least 50 words. Excerpt from Ch. 43. Reynolds argues in this section that “Of all cultural locations, the street is perhaps the most contested, the most up for grabs, and the most provocative.” What do you think she means? Why does she talk so much about the street? Use examples from this section. 4. According to Reynolds, many composition teachers want their students to go out into the streets to learn about their communities, encounter difference, and grow from these experiences — what is the danger of this approach? What must teachers be careful of? LINK TO READING: https://fiu.instructure.com/courses/77311/files/11904888/preview?verifier=zrfSlZww9Fm4aU8geuIJSZswNy5kdYTv3zKwm623

Consider the terms vague, ambiguity, and generality as they relate to our textbook reading for this week. How are vagueness, ambiguity, and generality used in politics or in law in order to achieve the desired outcome? What are some examples of how this might be applied in your future career? Include an example or two from current events that demonstrate the use of vagueness, ambiguity, and generality. Feel free to share an article, a screenshot of a social media post, a video, etc Please use the textbook as a reference and also cite the reference at the end

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the Realist’s view of a subject-matter curriculum?

Harman, “Moral Relativism Defended,” pp. 35-43 It is simple. Pretty much just talk about the reading, or how you feel about it/what’s your opinion? It is just a discussion.

Due:                Friday, August 28 by 11:59 p.m. (submit an electronic version of your response, as either a PDF or a Word document, on Blackboard) Format:           no more than 1 page, single-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins (papers over one page will not be graded); header must include: your name, the date, the course code Worth:             2% of final grade   Answer the following question:   Siddartha Gautama, the Buddha, had to leave home to reach enlightenment.  Do you think it’s necessary for a person to leave home to transform their perspective and grow?  Explain briefly why or why not.   Students are required to use gender-neutral language.  For instance, use “human” and “humankind” instead of “man” and “mankind,” and, when appropriate, “she” over “he.”   The purpose of these Reflection Responses is to encourage students to start thinking independently thought, to stay involved with the course, and to keep on top of the readings.     Responses will be graded as Pass or Fail. A passing grade will show independent thought, that the student has read the text, and that they have applied themself.  Incomplete and incoherent responses will fail.  A pass is worth 2% of the student’s final grade; a fail, 0%.