Physcology

1. Each week you must write a paper of approximately 250 words reflecting upon the week’s learning experiences at the agency in which you are completing your practicum. Summarize the task areas you performed and the number of hours in each, as per the “Typhon Weekly Hour Log.Reflect on your progress in gaining knowledge, skills, attitudes, and identity of professional practice. Explore any concerns that arose and may require special supervision or faculty intervention.

This project will be a 6–7 page paper in APA format. You will select a famous person (by reading a biography or viewing a movie) to complete a case study and a diagnosis. The person can be a historical or present-day figure of significance (e.g., has contributed to entertainment, science, industry, politics), or a fictitious character, such as Forest Gump or Anakin Skywalker.This assignment in no way suggests that you have the education or training to complete such a task in the real world. Moreover, it does not imply that your chosen person truly has the diagnosis and/or has consented to treatment. Therefore, you must write a disclaimer at the beginning of your paper to demonstrate an awareness of ethical practice. You must also base your diagnosis on information from the course readings and materials in addition to professional resources from the UMGC library.Please provide the following in your paper:Cover sheet: Provide the ethical disclaimer here.Background information: Give the background information of your subject (age, culture, gender, history, etc.) Discuss relevant socio-cultural aspects of his or her life—for example, possible historical influences (e.g., World War II). Discuss these with a focus on etiology.Diagnostic information: Provide a possible diagnosis, framed against the diagnostic possibilities from the course readings. Use books, journals, and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) for reference, to help you build your diagnostic summary. Explain signs and symptoms identified and their coherency with the person’s context (physiology, risk factors). Discuss bias, assumptions, confounds, and other considerations sound clinical diagnostic practices require.Compare and contrast of at least two theoretical orientations: Find at least two empirical supports for your diagnosis that pull from different theoretical orientations. Evaluate the diagnostic value (e.g., applicability, empirical strengths) of each within the context of your diagnosis. (Empirical supports must come from professional journals from theSummary and conclusions: Here, provide a synthesis of data and your conclusions based on a close analysis of the case.Your paper should be written as a coherent essay. You may include additional insights in your analysis, but you must address these key issues.Assignment GuidelinesPrepare your Famous Person Diagnostic Paper according to the following guidelines:Structure your paper utilizing APA style; this includes title page, headers, subheadings, in-text citations, reference page, and general paper format (1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12-point font, etc.). An abstract is not required.Submit as a single document in either Microsoft Word, PDF, or RTF format.Your final Famous Person Diagnostic Paper should be approximately 6 to 7 pages (excluding title page, cover page, and reference page):Title page (do not count page towards paper length requirement)Cover sheet (This is Page 2 of your document and will stand alone, with the ethical disclaimer typed at the top of the page. Do not count this page towards paper length requirement).Body of paper (6 to 8 pages)Reference page (do not count page towards paper length requirement)

200 words:  What were the most essential coaching competencies in the coach-client relationship between Phil Jackson and Michael Jordan?200 words: What were the most essential coaching competencies in the coach-client relationship between Bill Belichick and Tom Brady?200 words:  What evaluation assessments and tools would FEMA use to identify a client’s development needs? 

Read the Heinz dilemma (http://www.simplypsychology.org/kohlberg.html), and consider what you would do if you were in his place. Write down your answer and the reasons behind it. How would your answer fit in Kohlberg’s stages? Are there other responses that Kohlberg would consider “more moral”? If so, how do you feel about this? Do you think Kohlberg’s “Heinz dilemma” is a good measure of one’s morality? Explain.

Seamus, a 13-year-old boy, walks into your office and for the first time reveals that he is gay. Seamus asks you for help with “coming out” to his parents.about what considerations (e.g., intended and unintended consequences of his decision) you would want him to take into account before he approaches his family and others. Think about what you should do to prepare to speak with Seamus about his concerns. What might you suggest to Seamus? Consider any concerns that Seamus may have. Think about possible suggestions you might have for Seamus in approaching is family if any. Identify the possible consequences of his decision. Consider strategies you might share to reduce Seamus’ risk or bolster his resilience explain at least two important factors that you would consider when preparing to talk with Seamus about his concerns. Then explain at least one factor Seamus should consider before approaching his family. Finally, explain at least one strategy to reduce risk or to bolster Seamus’ resilience in the face of possible negative consequences with his family.