Political science

Take the difference between French and German nationalism. How would each of the theories of nationalism’s emergence explain the histories of these cases? What might each theory say about why French nationalism is often considered “civic” and German nationalism “ethnic”?

The theme of the article is “compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle’s views on both the best kind of human life, and the best kind of region or political rule. To what can we attribute the differences in their views on these issues?” (hint: make sure you discuss the role of meteorological thinking within each thinker’s writings, and the differences in their respective approaches to teleology.)You need to write a 1250 words article around this topic. Detailed requirements are in “essay requirements”.You should not refer to any online resources.PPT will give you information. The page inside refers to “Aristotle, Carnes Lord – Aristotle’s Politics University of Chicago Press (2013)” PDF

The course is divided into four major areas (agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation). Each student will prepare a twenty (20)-page portfolio synthesizing the four major areas. THE PORTFOLIO IS BASED SQUARLY ON MATERIAL COVERED IN CLASS. Check attached file for guidance on what to talk about and what sources to use.

Final paper: Since this is a survey course on national security, the final paper entails a wide range of choices depending on the interest of the particular student. Students must choose a particular national security issue upon which she or he will research. The overall goal of the paper is the following: 1) Capture a summary of the principle issue; 2) advance a thoughtful analysis of the issue; 3) relate the subject matter to the course; 4) incorporate at least six different sources you have found on your own in order to advance a substantial and thoughtful analysis; and 5) address a specific policy conundrum related to national security, intelligence, and/or terrorism. For example, one issue may deal with how the vast intelligence bureaucracy has hindered information sharing and how this has decreased U.S. national security.However, one would also have to address this problem and try to solve it.This assignment, therefore, is to prepare you for future university research and to think of policy analysis and solutions. It must be twelve pages in length, not including the reference list.

This paper is an opportunity to study the relationship between disasters and other political and social phenomena. Select one of the articles assigned to review for Wednesday, April 14th. This could be the article that you and your group discuss during your meeting, or perhaps a different reading. Read the article very carefully and develop a response paper that addresses the following themes in a 2-3 page narrative essay:· Begin with an introductory paragraph that provides an overview of the article.· In the next paragraph, provide a brief summary of the theoretical foundations for thestudy presented by the author.· Then, discuss the research question and hypothesis of the study, and present the keyvariables of the study and how they are to be operationalized or measured.· Review and discuss in more detail the actual empirical work or case study information developed in the article. What methodology and data do they employ, and what aresome interesting patterns or significant results?· What are the conclusions of the article?· Finally, and critically: what connections can you draw between this research and ourclass theories and arguments (be specific, where possible). What have you learned about how it is ‘all connected’?

Write an essay in response to the prompt given below. The essay should be around 1,500 words (please use 12-point font, 1-inch margins, and double spacing).· Your answer should rely primarily on the material covered in the lectures, supplemented by the assigned readings. Do not do outside research for this essay or bring in outside sources, but you may (and are encouraged to) consult and quote any of the sources (readings and/or lectures) we have used in the course so far.Prompt:While scholars of world politics have long emphasized its anarchic structure, there also exist clear elements of hierarchy in the international system, particularly between the rich, developed countries of the Global North and the poor, developing countries of the Global South. The difference between the Global North and South has been institutionalized in various ways in contemporary global governance, and these two groups of states often have widely divergent views on the purpose, justice and value of different governance arrangements, a fact which often complicates the creation and implementation of effective global policies.Discuss how the economic and political inequalities between the North and South are manifested in three global governance regimes: the nuclear non-proliferation regime, the climate change regime, and the regime governing global development. Your answer should consist of three parts. In the first part, identify the different rights and responsibilities enjoyed by the North and South in all three regimes. Then, discuss the costs and benefits that these unequal rights and responsibilities generate for the management of these three global problems. What tensions exist between the Global North and South in these regimes and how do these tensions weaken the regime’s effectiveness? Finally, suggest some possible reforms to each regime that could better address the inequities in the relationship between the North and South in the practice of global governance. Be as specific as possible in offering your recommendations.

• 1 )Robert Williams, “The Supreme Court and the Legal History of Racism” (from textbook)• Robert Williams, “The Savage as a Wolf” (from • responses are should be 1000 words each and provide a summary to theweekly readings. The response should include three parts: (1) a summary of the readings, (2) a connection to other course topics, and (3) a personal response to the reading.• 2nd • 2 forum posts and responses ask that engage with your classmates on theassigned readings and films. You are required to submit (1) an original post of 200-words that summarizes the reading or film and (2) an original comment of 100-words to a student post.

I need 6 full pages eachI need these assignments for 2 different students with the same teacher so you will give me 2 different copies, YOU NEED TO CHOOSE 2 DIFFERENT SUBJECT FOR EACH ONE.FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONSEssay 2: Logos, Ethos, PathosWrite a six-full-page essay on a debatable topic of your choice in which you effectively use logos, ethos, and pathos to support your claim. Your purpose is to persuade your audience. Use clear language.For logos, include facts from sources, possibly numbers, to show the scope of what you are talking about: how much money involved, how many people affected. . . .Ethos comes through the credibility of the sources you quote. Use credible sources. Direct quotations seem more real than indirect quotations, but limited use of indirect quotations can save space and time. You might also draw on your own special knowledge of something, such as your life experience, your hobby, your sport, if it is relevant and out of the ordinary.Pathos gets a bit extra emphasis in this essay. It depends on concrete, sensory detail. For pathos, use moving stories of individuals: one person, one animal, one town.(Notice the difference between logos and pathos:logos: “Every year, there are 1.5 million evictions in the United States.”pathos: “Mary Smith was holding a baby in each arm when the marshals knocked on her door that cold January morning in Fairbanks, Alaska.”)Type your essay in MLA formatActions, including a Works Cited page. Make your essay as meaningful as you can.Rubric?Refer to the Essay 1 rubric generally. Specific to this essay: here is essay one rubric I don’t know if you will need it or not https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/rogerian-argument-essaysAn “A” essay will include moving examples or stories of individual people, animals, towns, or the like.An “A” essay will have direct quotations with sources properly cited and an orderly Wor

The analysis of the international and regional assistance in post-conflict reconstruction of Afghanistan. 3000 Words on Chicago Style.

While not being political, during the current pandemic, a point was made in the media that the Trump Administration eliminated the White House Health and Security Office. Some individuals have claimed that this elimination resulted in the lack of preparedness of the US. But is that true?FACTS: The National Security Council staff is supposed to help the president coordinate the government response to international crises and homeland security issues, by identifying emerging problems and making sure Cabinet agencies and other departments are working cooperatively.After Barack Obama became president in January 2009, he eliminated the White House Health and Security Office, which worked on international health issues. However, after multiple issues arose with the 2014 Ebola epidemic, President Obama established a Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense at the NSC in 2016. This directorate had its own staff and was headed by an individual who no longer reported to the President but to the national security adviser.This structure survived during the early part of the Trump’s Administration, when the office was headed by Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer. After John Bolton became the national security adviser, he decided the organizational chart was a mess and led to too many conflicts. He also thought the staff was too large, having swollen to 430 people, including staffers in the pipeline.Bolton reorganized the directorate and eliminated a number of deputy national security advisers so there was just one. And he folded the global health directorate into a new one that focused on counterproliferation and biodefense. Bolton thought there was obvious overlap between arms control and nonproliferation, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and global health and biodefense. Morrison, who headed the combined office beginning in July 2018, was named Deputy Assistant to the President and thus had more clout and access than the head of the previous Directorate under Obama.One can see the dueling narratives between the Obama and Trump administrations, neither entirely incorrect. The office — as set up by Obama — was folded into another office in the Trump Administration. Thus, one could technically claim the office was eliminated. But the staff slots did not disappear, and the key mission of team remained a priority. So, one can also claim nothing changed. The positions that made up the old unit still are filled within the NSC and their funding was actually increased under Trump. Morrison answered directly to the President and could get things quickly to his attentionQuestion: The real change between the Obama and Trump Administrations was a philosophical one. Under the Obama policy, epidemics and pandemics were treated as global health issues that could be addressed through international diplomacy, transparency, and international cooperation. By improving healthcare in third world countries, it was believed that outbreaks could be prevented. Under the Trump policy, it was felt that the epidemiology of a biological health emergency is virtually identical to a bioterrorism attack. As a result, during 2018, the NSC merged three directorates into one to create a seamless interaction between those preparing for biological threats, regardless of whether they are man-made or naturally occurring.You are now the advisor to the President, based on what you have learned in the BSBD program, which approach do you agree with (or maybe something different). Based on your concept, argue with all of your passion why this should be the US policy. How would you implement your approach, who would you use as advisors (expertise not names), how would you maintain the National Strategic Stockpile and prioritize what goes into it