Political science

Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voter’s views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. 

Please write between 50 to 300 words. Question: Explain James Madison’s statement that “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”

The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic of study materials in your response. 

Institutional Analysis Paper Instructions   Overview: In this paper, students will discuss and answer the following questions: Is the “state” always the most just political structuring for a particular group of people? What legislative, judicial, and executive structures and arrangements are the best for ensuring liberty, justice, stability and prosperity (LJSP)?   General Guidelines: All ideas shared by the student must be supported with sound reason and citations from the required readings, presentations, and additional research. The paper should be 4-5 pages of content in length (not counting the title page or references), double-spaced, and in Turabian format. All required readings and presentations from Modules 1-2 must be cited.  3-5 scholarly sources must be used.

This assignment was locked on Aug 7 at 5 pm. Upload your homework assignment here:    Reading response based on one of the weekly readings. Should be between 1-2 pages (double spaces, 12pt font, Times New Roman) ~500 words.    Your own thoughts and reflections and not a summary of the readings. Assume that I have already read the reading (I have). I want to know what you think and how you are responding to the readings. Think of this as a thoughtful reflection: Do you agree or disagree with the claims the author is making? Did you learn something new? What part was most valuable to your understanding?    Due by Friday at 5 pm.

Many people before the 2020 presidential election looked at public opinion polls and saw that President Trump was viewed very negatively by women and assumed that he would do worse with women at the polls than he did in 2016. Instead, the exact opposite happened. What do you think accounted for the fact that public opinion polls involving female support for Trump was underestimated and why? Be sure to use concrete examples to support your key points.

What is the future of politics? Must have a background in political science. Please reword the whole essay to look completely different from the sample essay. Maintain references. Use exemplary English.

It must have a thesis statement. Madison is saying factions are horrible but we can’t get rid of them because the solutions are worse then the problem, there, we need to manage then by creating a large republic instead of a small democracy and a federalist system with a national government instead of a confederate system run by the states. 1st Paragraph: Identifying the problem, Opening paragraph, Introducing what’s going on, and also why does madison say that why a pure democracy or direct democracy doesn’t work? too much power at one of the levels of government, and find a simple way of fixing it, and the solution is to come up with is a representative democracy with federalism (federalist republic) 2nd Paragraph: A republic, and why a republic is going to fix this issues connecting to 1st paragraph 3rd Paragraph: Focusing Federalism, and addressing issues that were addressed in the 2nd paragraph 4th Paragraph: Conclusion, Restate the Thesis, tie things together.

What are the differences in Regulatory authorities of US Europe and India?

After reading the Nevada Constitution in brief, what if any provisions in Nevada’s constitution do you find archaic or problematic in the 21st century? What provisions still work? Be specific and reference specific provisions. Overview of Discussion: Small groups – You have randomly been put into small groups for your online discussions. You will be in this group for half the semester, then at the midterm, you will be put into a different group (Group 1: start – midterm & Group 2:midterm – final). Your group will only have about 10 people which encourages more accountability and encourages more in-depth discussions. You will only be able to see and participate in your group’s discussion board. Each week, one of your group members will become a group leader, in which the group leader will provide a 3-4 sentence summary of what was shared/discussed in that week’s discussion post. It is strongly encouraged for you to not wait till the last minute to post, on your group’s discussion board. No points will be awarded for posts made after the due dates. Good posts: will include a clear and complete response to the question, some specific examples from reading or course materials, and a clear opinion on the issue. Excellent posts: will include more detail, thoughtful context, and several specific examples from reading. Specific examples can be simple, “as the reading this week showed, buffalo were hunted almost to extinction….” Your posts can be casual and are meant to be read by fellow students just add some specifics to back up your opinions and try to avoid making generalizations without evidence.