Political science

students will find a current event related to topics in Texas government: state and local politics. Whats a summary analysis, you say? The granddaddy of all political science, Harold Lasswell, is known for defining Politics. , Ideological values, beliefs, and opinions, aside, when it comes to government and politics, his definition of the word (ironically) is probably the only thing that all mankind can agree on. Lasswell, defines politics, as “who gets what, where, when, and how”. Apply that definition to the article’s information, or the article’s information to that definition, and write a 10 sentence summary that focuses on critically evaluating what is going on, from your personal perspective. Interject your opinion. You should be making a statement, argument, and your opinion about the subject matter should be known. However, this needs to be done in a scholarly and academic manner. Focus on explanation, reason and rationalization, to provide a clear opinion statement and discussion of their personal perspective and political position towards the event or issue in their article. In addition, to receive full credit, students MUST include a direct link to the original article’s text that they are using to complete this assignment. 

Write an essay in response to ONE of the two following questions. Follow all instructions. Make sure that all minimum requirements are met. What should the US do to manage corporate malfeasance and power? Should major corporations be allowed to exist in a democracy?  Minimum requirements Standard MLA format (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, etc.) Works Cited page (does not count toward the minimum requirement) 3 full pages minimum; 4 full pages maximum Use of The Corporation (quoted at least twice) Use of at least 2 other credible sources (each quoted at least once) Attempted use of Aristotle’s arrangement pattern Note: For Option 1, pick ONE thing to argue. For Option 2, have a strong YES or NO; then, proceed to make your case. Keep refutation in mind for both.

What is the ideal foreign policy doctrine for the Twenty-First Century? Which problems do you consider priorities, and which values (or combination of values) and approaches inform your doctrine?  -Questions to Consider Before Responding Here are some questions to prime your thinking, and may help you develop your argument:  What do you see as the most critical challenges confronting the US in the 21st Century, and how would you prioritize and respond to them? Why? In responding to these problems, would you pursue a liberal-internationalist policy, a realist policy, or a neo-conservative policy, or something else? Why? Would you work multilaterally or unilaterally? Diplomatically or militarily or via some combination of both? How would you manage economics and trade? Security and security policy?  How central should US economic, military, and cultural power be in maintaining the international system? Why? What similarities and differences between the Bush, Obama, and Trump Doctrines exist? What does the Trump Administration get right and wrong in its approach?  What values should inform US foreign policy, and why? What is (are) the best way(s) for the US to address these problems? Should the US develop an ad hoc foreign policy or articulate a “universal” doctrine or an “organizing principle” in response? Why? Is the US wrong to abdicate its central role in maintaining the core system (Haass, Drezner, etc.), or are US interests best served by pursuing unilateral interests?   Should the US seek an “indispensable,” “money-ball,” or “independent” America strategy (Bremmer)? In addition to the assigned readings and lectures, you may also elect to incorporate contemporary articles drawn from the discussions and the news to support your argument.  -Pre-Submission Checklist for Essay 3 Have you: clearly articulated your thesis (argument) in your introduction addressed each part of the prompt drawn on course material for support, and supplemented with outside materials when necessary formatted your paper using MLA edited your essay for clarity, flow, and tone in standard academic English, avoiding slang and other colloquial speech proofread your paper for writing mechanics (spelling, grammar, etc.) converted your file to “doc” or “docx” or “RTF” or “pdf” as needed

Pick a breach from the list provided and then explain in a 1,200- to 1,500-word report where the policy failed and/or where management failed to implement the policy. Make sure to address the following: What portion of the policy first allowed the Kill Chain to be effective? How can the implementation of policies be strengthened so a breach is not repeated? Were laws broken when the policy was not followed or even developed? What were the financial costs that occurred for the company? In the Bible, the story of David killing Goliath (1 Samuel 17:4) shows that Goliath has advanced bronze armor, but this armor is futile against a stone and sling. This gives us a lesson that our trust in technology to save us is not always warranted. Examine the application of the Christian worldview within the context of a security breach and how it can be prevented. Data Breaches Yahoo. Date: 2013-14. Adult Friend Finder. Date: October 2016. eBay. Date: May 2014. Equifax. Date: July 29, 2017. … Heartland Payment Systems. Date: March 2008. Target Stores. Date: December 2013. TJX Companies, Inc. Date: December 2006. JP Morgan Chase. Date: July 2014.

Please explain and discuss the role of factions in the Federalist Papers by looking at the three Federalist Papers found in the textbook ” Political Theory and Government. Wellington, New Zealand: Humanities Academic Press, 2019. ISBN:  978-0995102385. Be sure to cite the relevant Federalist Papers in the book.  Please cite and quote from the book and not the internet or other sources.  Please be concise.   You need to talk about the three Federalist Papers found in this book when you write your essay.    Please follow the writing instructions in your syllabus. Do not exceed 800 words and do not write less than 450. Submit online.

I have to write a 500-word Discussion on The meaning of Political.   What is political? Using the course textbook, the film below, any additional sources, and personal experiences we will work together to construct a definition of the term “political”. We hear the term thrown around all the time, but what does it really mean? Have you ever heard of the phrase “the personal is political”? Let’s take this deep dive together to construct a linguistic foundation for our course.  Chapter 1  https://openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/1-1-what-is-government It will be nice if you can bring up the current problem with the BLM movement, women’s rights. Respond directly to the prompt.  Reference the course textbook in the body of your response.  Provide a minimum of 500 words. The prompt https://youtu.be/Zkfg2cdX844

–   The book’s name is      Walter J. Nicholls. “The Immigrant Rights Movement: The Battle over National Citizenship.” Stanford University Press, 2019. – Please answer the following question: 1. What is the main research question advanced by Nicholls?  2.

Paper is arguing that banning flavoured tobacco but especially menthol cigarettes will have major detrimental effects on Black Americans. Need to compare the regulation of hookah with other flavoured tobaccos. Also need to articulate which ethnic groups use different flavoured tobaccos most frequently. Introduction of Hookah to the United States, difference between Hookah and other flavoured tobaccos in terms of regulation, and social justice issues behind banning menthol cigarettes and how it will impact Black Americans

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate a literacy of power, politics, and government as we usually encounter it in our lives, especially interpreting the news.  What is going on in the article represents and illustrates in real life what we’ve learned about politics, government, and power in the course.   You will be graded upon your ability to properly identify power, politics, and government concepts, to correctly apply these course concepts in the analysis, and to correctly explain how the concepts explain what is going on in the article. Write a 5-page paper, double-spaced, 1″ margins, 12-point font.  Please cite as appropriate and provide works cited list (any citation format is fine).  Do not summarize the article; stick to analysis.  For help, answer the questions below in your paper to aid in your analysis.   Analysis Tips This article covers everything we’ve learned this semester.  It discusses all the institutions and actors in Texas politics and implies policy and political ideas also addressed in the course.   Answer the following questions to help you analyze the article:   1.  What institutions do you see in the article?  What are they doing and why?  What vocabulary, concepts, and theories have we learned about these institutions and behaviors? 2.  What political behaviors are the people doing?  What have we’ve learned about these behaviors–vocab, concepts, theories?  How are people interacting with the institutions? 3.  How does Texas political history, culture, power affect what is going on?  What vocab, concepts, and theories have we learned to explain the context?   We have learned about: political cultures & power political participation interest groups and political parties three branches:  Congress, Courts, Governor various policy issues, including access to justice issues, access to voting issues, etc.  the Constitution and federalism local governments (county, city, special districts)

433. Change is so great a curse that we could not even abolish so great a wrong as slavery without great temporary suffering; and that people is happiest and most likely to maintain its liberties, and to be prosperous, which, by natural temperament, dislikes change, and can be moved to it only upon important occasions and for clearly and even pressingly necessary objects. Stability of laws, stability in industry and business, the stability of character and of purpose in the individual, are all of the far greater importance than the most brilliant experiments in government, or the most seductive and adventurous enterprises…      As we watch today’s political campaigns, we see most of the Democrat candidates advocating revolutionary changes to our economic system, with a massive increase in the role of government in the lives of all Americans.  Such policies as “Medicare for all”, “Guaranteed income for all citizens”, “The Green New Deal”, “Open Borders and Citizenship for all Immigrants” are touted as being, in Nordhoff’s words, “the most brilliant experiments in government, or the most seductive and adventurous enterprises…      In an original essay of c.350-500 words, address how you think Nordhoff would respond to the revolutionary proposals of today’s Democrat candidates–Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, et al.  Do you believe the positions of Biden, AOC, and The Squad promotes national stability, national liberty or national prosperity?  Nordhoff comments that even a reason as important and necessary as the abolition of slavery could not be accomplished without massive national trauma and violence…at least temporarily.  Is battling “Climate Change” as worthy an endeavor as abolishing slavery? In your opinion, can the Democrat/Socialists accomplish their fundamental remaking of America without another outbreak of trauma and violence?  As a Texan, how do you predict many in this state would respond should a President Biden, using his already named Gun Czar, Beto O’Rourke, order the confiscation of firearms from all citizens?  In short, do you agree with Nordhoff that governments should support stability, prosperity, and liberty; and avoid the temptation to indulge in “seductive experiments” in government?