Political science

I uploaded the print direction in the file. there are 3 links need to be click in to read. – the paper should consist of at least 5 paragraphs (2 pages in length) following this format: 1. Introduction Paragraph: Summarizes the purpose of the paper, uses an attention-getting devise to draw the reader in. 2. Paragraphs 2-3: Provide a summative analysis of federalism, tracing its evolution throughout U.S. history to where we are today. 3. Paragraph 4: Provide an analysis of a current topic or issue pertaining to federalism. A. Describe the issue or topic b. Describe the relationship to federalism (I.e. what are the states doing vs. What is the federal government doing?) c. Describe why the issue is controversial regarding governance 4. Conclusion paragraph: Summarize the paper and tie it all together.

Dear International Strategic Management Executives: This year, we have in the United States of America one of the MOST COSEQUENTIAL Presidential Elections not just for the United States but also for the world … . This coming Thursday, October 22nd, 2020 at 9 PM EST, we have in the United Stated of America the 2nd Presidential Debate at Belmont University in Nashville, TN. between:  . The President of the United States: Donald J. Trump from the Republican Party and former Vice President of the United States Joe Biden from the Democrat Party. . Given the relevance of this event for the outcomes of the US Presidential election, and the impact that it will have in business, the world, and on all of us, it is extremely important we are on top and first hand well informed about the topics and positions of each candidate even if you are not US citizen and therefore elegible to vote.  . For this reason, I am granting you with the possibility to EARN 5% Final Extra Points in this class if you watch and develop the following Learning Assignment about the US 2nd Presidential Debate Thursday, October 22nd, 2020 at 9 PM EST. . Please analyze, discuss, and respond in great detail …: . During this 2020 Presidential Election in the United States of America: . * What issues are most important to you and your friends, parents, family members? * How closely have you been following this election? * What have you noticed so far?  . During – after watching the US 2nd Presidential Debate Thursday, October 22nd, 2020 at 9 PM EST: . * What are 5–6 words or phrases that describe your thoughts and feelings about the debate? . * Given the issue(s) that is(are) most important to you, how would you rate each candidate’s position on that issue(s)? . * What issue(s) do you think needed more exploration? . * If you could ask a question of the candidates (that wasn’t asked) what would the question be and based on your knowledge of the candidates, how do you think they might respond? . * From which exchange did you learn the most? What was the issue? What did you learn? . * What was the most contentious or interesting part of the debate and why? . * What was a memorable moment in the debate and why? . * After watching the debate, what candidate most impressed you and why? . * Did the debate make you feel hopeful or fearful about the future of the United States of America and the world? Please explain. . * Do you think the debate focused more on personality and character than on substantive issues and topics? In what ways is this positive and negative? .  expect high caliber responses with top analyses and interesting insights and discussions Kristen Welker, moderator of the Oct. 22, 2020 presidential debate, has selected the topics for that debate. Subject to possible changes because of news developments, the topics are as follows, not necessarily to be brought up in this order: Fighting COVID-19 American Families Race in America Climate Change National Security Leadership The debate will be held on Thursday, October 22 at Belmont University in Nashville, TN. The debate will start at 9:00 p.m. ET and run for 90 minutes without commercial interruption.

A 2–3 page essay on one of several provided topics dealing with confirmation and induction. Word limit: 1000 words. Describe Hume’s problem of induction and explain why it is a problem for science. Why is the scientific method usually thought to be inductive? Use an example to illustrate. In your view, what does Hume’s problem teach us about science?

YOUR TASK FOR THIS PAPER IS TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Define what makes it means to be a member of American society. Do Americans maintain a distinct belief system in comparison to foreign nationals? Can someone who is not born here develop a belief system that is distinctly American? 2. How does the American Persona guide this nation’s foreign policy? 3. Does the American Persona require any alteration or is does it work for the United States?

What is Dr. King’s philosophy of nonviolence and what are the key views of the black power movement?

What is political philosophy? What is the message that Plato sends about democracy in his Allegory of the Cave?

Write an essay about voter ignorance. Is voter ignorance a serious problem? Why or why not? To what extent does it affect federal politics and policy? To the extent that it is a problem, are there practical and feasible things that can be done to improve the situation? What would those be? Consider also: What are the most important things that voters should know about the federal politics and policy? As you discuss these issues, make sure you engage with the “rational ignorance” idea – i.e., the idea that, because there is a miniscule chance that one’s vote will tip an election, it is irrational for people to expend effort to learn about politics and government in order to make a better, more informed vote. (See Johnson, pp. 20-22. Kernell et al., Chapter 11, also discusses the concept. Note that the same idea undergirds the idea of “rational abstention” (from voting); but this essay assignment is about voter knowledge, not about voter turnout in elections.) There are no explicitly right or wrong answers to these questions.

In this first part of our discussion board, each of you is going to choose a theory that is discussed in chapter three of the book. It can be realism, liberalism, radicalism, or constructivism (the reason I’ve not included feminism is that it’s more of a critique of the other theories rather than a standalone theory of its own). You can choose whichever one you want. You shouldn’t need anything other than the book and the videos in Module 2 to do this assignment, but you can also use other internet sources if you would like, so long as they are reputable. Ideally, please post your response below rather than uploading it as a word document/PDF, since that’s harder for your classmates to read. I would like you to compose a 300-500 word post that summarizes the following about your theory: 1) What are the basics of your theory? What does your theory think are the most important things to pay attention to in international relations? What is the role of the state in your theory? 2) What do you find compelling about your theory? What makes it believable? 3) What do you find unbelievable or unrealistic about your theory? You can score up to 20 points based on your use of evidence, the thoroughness and accuracy of your answer, and your correct usage of grammar/spelling.

Congratulations! On your new role as the newest member of the US Supreme Court. Your task is to record a yes or no voters on the following three questions:   *Does the constitution protect the right of privacy   *Did the state law, as applied in this specific case, violate a right to privacy?   *Does the state sodomy law deny the equal protection guaranteed by the 14th Amendment Facts: These two gentlemen were arrested when they were caught engaging in illegal consensual sodomy in the privacy of their home. Before 2003, this behavior was considered a misdemeanor crime. When the officer arrived under the false report of a jealous friend, these two gentlemen were discovered and arrested.  The third person on this scenario was arrested for filing a false report. The sodomy charge resulted in a short stay in jail and a small $ fine However, they fought back bringing this all the way to the life-time tenured us Supreme Court. Their argument is law passed and enforced in this situation was unconstitutional. This was a 6-3 decision allowing for disagreement. I want you to understand the power of the US Supreme Court to challenge the policies of any state. In this case, a to challenge to a conservative policy. If you side with Lawrence, the law is voided. If you vote with Texas, the homosexual act remains a crime. Record your yes or no vote in each question and write an explanation that explains your vote on the case. It is not necessary to explain each question. A yes vote in # 2 or 3 gets rid of the sodomy law.  A no vote on #1 -is an automatic no on #2. Below are the two amendments that should help in your interpretation regarding privacy and equal protection. This is your judicial decision……

Seminar Question Must watch link to complete essay: https://youtu.be/SmGNgbHlEUw Our examination of Civil Liberties helps us appreciate the balance of power that is codified in the Constitution. How does the existence and exercise of Civil Liberties show evidence of structural and procedural balance-of-power? Of pluralism?