Political science

ANSWER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING PROMPTS.In your answer, demonstrate that you have paid attention to and reflected upon the material in the readings. (attached below as PDF)note: you don’t need to use all of the attached sources, only what is necessary. please only use the primary sources attached. no secondary/outside sources allowed.TOPIC ONE.Constitutional War Powers and the Question of Time. Throughout American history, the political system as grappled with the possibility that urgent, quick action might be necessary to safeguard U.S. territory and lives. Such arguments usually conclude that presidents must be equipped, legally and technologically, to act “with dispatch” because Congress, as a collective body, is less able to do so. And yet, Congress has been able to act quickly in emergencies. And it is easy for a set of events to be characterized as an emergency when in fact there is no imminent threat to Americans or to our essential national security interests.A. How should the system work to ensure timely legitimate responses to threats? Using evidence from the readings from the founding period, make an argument about how the Constitutional system as initially designed and intended was supposed to handle the questions above. Critique the founding setup, and make an argument about whether the initial system is ideal, or if not, how the system should, in your opinion, address the question of timeliness.B. How has the system worked to ensure timely legitimate responses to threats? Go over the cases that we studied in class. Find at least one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should work, and at least one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should not work. Why did the constitutional processes work well or poorly in these cases? What does that tell us about how the constitutional system deals with real world foreign policy challenges?C. How can we make it work better?  What are the barriers to the constitutional system operating the way you think it should? What political, social, rhetorical, or policy solutions might help produce more processes that look like the one you prefer, while discouraging processes that look like the ones you do not prefer.TOPIC TWO.Checks and balances in war powers will never be resolved solely by the courts. They will be adjudicated in part based on the political interactions between the president, the Congress, and the public. How can a partisan political system, and a largely ignorant American public, make this system work in a responsible way?A. Using specific examples from the readings, describe what you see are any strengths, and what you see as any deficiencies, in the way partisanship affects constitutional reasoning and American political development in the authority to use military force at home and abroad.B. Assuming that political parties are inevitable in elective democracies, do you think that the design of our constitutional system adequately balances, constrains, and legitimizes the use of force? Are there any constitutional changes that might better take political partisanship into account when legitimizing the use of force? C. Assuming no actual changes to the constitutional system are made, make a normative argument about how we, as Americans, and as partisans, should act so that we can responsibly authorize the use of force under the Constitution now and in future generations.

write about the military MISSION ORDERS and Military DECISION MAKING PROGRESS.  it is a persuasive essay,  really want to focus on : why the MDMP is important to develop an OPORD, why does the commander play an important role during the process, and why the staff are key participants on this process.

I have a 500 word aka 2 pages that needs to be done by answering a question based on your opinion, this is for political science The Founders clearly envisioned a smaller role for the national government than what we currently see. How have society and technology changed to allow and/or require greater national government control? That’s the question to be answered other than that no format or anything.

The United States and France are more culturally similar to the UK than are Thailand and South Korea, yet Tesco failed in the former two and has beenhighly successful in the latter two. How might you explain the difference?

Qs 1 Are you a social conservative? Explain why or why not. Qs 2 Are you a economic liberal? Explain why or why not. Qs 3 Explain how a bill becomes a law. Explain the veto and veto override in your answer. Qs 4 How does impeachment and conviction work? Why was Trump just impeached? Qs 5 Why did it mean in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal? Where the people who wrote this just hypocrites? Qs 6 What do you think Madison’s view of factions? Qs 7 Was Madison right about representative democracy reducing the problem of democracy? Qs 8 What is meant by level have branches. Include in your answer a list of the 3 levels and 3 branches. Qs 9 Who do you agree with more Brooks or Chain? Explain Qs 10 What do you think of Anderson’s view of gender roles? Explain Qs 11 How does the electoral college work? Why does the national popular vote not determine the winner? Qs 12 What did you think of Poillit’s view about what is right about divorce? What would Anderson say to her?

opinion based essay about political science. More of a introduction to the us government etc What values do Americans tend to share? Are there any values that all Americans share? why do we disagree so vehemently about the proper role of government in upholding those. That’s the instructions, it’s just a opinion 2 page response to this prompt

During the entire class, you should be paying attention to what is going on in the US and abroad.  For this discussion, you will be asked three questions.  For full credit you must answer each question and then come back and respond to at least two students (one with whom you disagree).  These must all be posted on time. Module 1 Discussion Question #1: How has a recent American political event/issue affected you in your daily life?  Module 1 Discussion Question #2:  Which theory of power, elitism or pluralism, do you believe best describes the American political system? Module 1 Discussion Question #3: What do you believe our lives would be like today IF the Articles of Confederation had NOT be replaced with the US Constitution?   Each of your answers should be written in at least one complete paragraph (5-10 sentences per paragraph).  In this discussion you should have a minimum of 3 paragraphs.  Start by answering each of the questions. To do this, click on Reply and type in your three paragraphs.  This is known as your initial post. You will not be able to come back and edit your answers so be sure to check for grammar and cite any sources outside of our lectures and our online textbook.   When you are satisfied with your answers, click on Post Reply.  You MUST have your answers posted before you may look at any of your fellow students answers (i.e. blank initial posts are not allowed).  This initial post is due by NOON on the due date.  Now that you have your initial post completed, you will be able to see/read what your fellow students have posted.  Find two students’ posts that interests you–one with whom you disagree.  Click on Reply, type in why their post interests you and/or why you disagree (4+ sentences) and then click on Post Reply.  You MUST respond to two students before 11:59 PM on the due date.  ONE OF YOUR RESPONSES MUST BE WITH A STUDENT WITH WHOM YOU DISAGREE. Your responses to other students in this class MUST always be thoughtful and professional.  Check again on these Tips on Disagreeing.  Anything I deem inappropriate will not receive credit and the student writing the response will be contacted by me.  After an initial warning, the student may be asked to drop this class.

In your essay of at least three pages, research one major scandal involving politicians (Watergate, Bill Clinton, Iran-Contra Affair, Silvio Berlusconi, etc.), and address the following: Describe how the media portrayed the politicians involved (1 page). Discuss the outcome of the scandal (1 page). Did individuals gain greater political power and exposure? Did they resign from office or were their political careers cut short due to the scandal? Explain what effect, if any, the scandal had on the political environment and the media and why (1 page).

my essay question is Analyze the important positions in the senate and explain where the real leadership is found.

Reflect: Political ideology has an enormous impact on our world at every level of politics: local, state, national, and international. How political ideology manifests itself provides insight into the social, technological, environmental, and economic institutions, political structures, and actors of every political entity. The ability to evaluate how political ideology impacts politics is an essential skill that all political scientists must have to become a professional in their field of study. Write: In your essay of at least three pages, address the following: Describe the central political ideology discussed in each article (1 page). Identify one national and one international policy affected by one of the political ideologies discussed (1 page). Assess which political ideology discussed is the most accurate in describing today’s world (1 page). Attached are the sources that are the articles it is mentioning.