Psychology

2:2 Attachment starts from the moment of birth as an infant begins to recognize her mother’s smell, voice, and face. Children with insecure attachment due to a parent with unresolved emotional issues or an inconsistent parenting style show an inability to consistently show emotions. Children who have a secure attachment to at least one adult have higher self-esteem, social skills, and empathy. Empathy can be shown by children as young as 2 years of age and continues to develop into adolescence. Empathy is critical to the formation of healthy, reciprocal relationships. It allows individuals to understand how someone else may feel. If empathy is lacking, an individual may not hold back from physically or emotionally harming others because he does not have the capacity to understand how the impact of such harm. The relationship between the lack of empathy and antisocial behavior can be evident in children in early to middle elementary school years. This lack of empathy is one of the primary contributors to violent behavior. In this Assignment, you analyze the role that attachment plays in the development of empathy and how empathy is a protective factor against violent behavior. You also explore the expression “neurons that fire together wire together” and how it relates to violent behavior. To prepare for this Assignment: Review the Learning Resources related to attachment and empathy. By Day 7 In a 3- to 5- page paper: Explain the role of attachment in empathy. Explain how and why the presence of empathy may be a protective factor against causing harm. Provide an example of a violent crime and how attachment and empathy may play a role.Explain whether or not empathy may be hard-wired. If so, how? Provide an example. Explain the expression “neurons that fire together wire together.” Provide an example. Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources and other academic sources. Grading Criteria Content  Points Range: 47.25 (63%) – 52.5 (70%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.  Points Range: 42 (56%) – 47.2 (62.93%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. The paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.  Points Range: 36.75 (49%) – 41.95 (55.93%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.  Points Range: 0 (0%) – 36.7 (48.93%) Paper demonstrates a poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. The Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Writing  Points Range: 20.25 (27%) – 22.5 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with the graduate-level writing style. The paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.  Points Range: 18 (24%) – 20.2 (26.93%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. For more information on Empathy read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy

the pictures attached explain the paper…. please use these as references included in the paper https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm01 https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-

 During admission, we complete our patient risk assessment and a physical plant risk assessment. our safety committee must provide ongoing staff training to ensure awareness of potential risks on units, Installation of products that reduce risk in all patient areas, and routine inspections of inpatient. our psychiatric units to ensure safety levels are maintained. The care and safety of psychiatric patients at risk of harm to themselves or others, and the staff providing care are our primary concerns. A ligature risk (point) may include anything which could be used to create a sustainable attachment point such as a cord, rope, or other material for the purpose of hanging or strangulation. Also, the staff should monitor shower rails, coat hooks, pipes and radiators, window and door frames, ceiling fittings, handles, hinges, and closures. Common ligature points and ligatures are doors, hooks/handles, windows frames, belts, sheets, towels, and shoelaces. Staff finds any ligatures risk immediately reported to the supervisor. The general members are in the group include MHTA, Nursing administer, risk management team, safety officer. Any concerns raised by workers or supervisors; the correction plan is taken immediately. The safety committee meeting will take place every two weeks. The safety committee must publish once a month report to our department heads. The nursing administrator provides information to each ward If any concerns or any issues to address and followed by in-service to each employee. They are responsible for planning, placing, and frequent education sections. They should understand the issues and applicable to daily life and working environment. For more information on Physical Plant, Risk read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk

AS Description: This module afforded opportunity to compare biological versus socialization viewpoints to examine behaviors used to initiate and maintain relationships. Both perspectives can be applied to explore sexual orientation, patterns of dating, love and fidelity, divorce and remarriage, and sex differences in parenting. Select one perspective and one area of application to analyze its effect on relationships. Discuss the viewpoint and its influence on the selected area through factual points discussed from the readings.AS Instructions: Create your response into a word document with a minimum of 550-750 words. Include an APA cover page and reference page and use appropriate in text citations for all factual points.

Please answer the following 2 questions.  Strong answers will include detailed examples answering each question.1) What role does culture play in shaping relationships?  How does the cross-cultural research on relationships distinguish between individualist and collectivist cultures?  What did the Baumgarte (2011) article suggest about the role of culture in shaping relationships? b2) What are the 3 basic motives for Social Behavior we discussed in the lecture?  Imagine you are the professor for a class at NVCC in the Spring 2021 semester.  How would you use these motives to setup a successful culture in that class?  How would you use what you have learned about culture this semester to help students adjust to your classroom culture? For more information on Cross Culture read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_Culture

Psychology Course Topic: Gratitude and Mental Health, the Importance of Civility Assignment:  Write a literature review proposal based on civility, and the importance of saying thank you.  Design an experiment that shows the importance of gratitude and how it affects the mental health of individuals  Needs 5 paragraph introduction, 2 paragraphs of literature review. Complete the literature review outline.  *Guidance: http://homepages.wmich.edu/~applegab/EMR640/litrevw.pdf Length: 4 pages, APA format, requires 3-4 scholarly peer-reviewed references, use subheadings. For more information on the Importance of Civility read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civility

By Day 7 of Week 10 Write an 8- to 10-page interview strategy that includes the following: A summary of the murder case you selected An analysis of the offender’s personality, including any personality disorders or comorbidity that may be present An explanation of how aggression, attachment, and empathy factor into the offender’s personality An explanation of how “state” versus “trait” factors into the case Recommendations for the interview, including the following: Selection of the interviewer Environment of the interview How to manage the interviewer’s response Description of how to ask the interview question the case study a chosen On 14th February 2018 a gunman operated a semi-automatic rifle in Stoneman Douglas high school. The shooter then pretended to bend down like other people at the scene. There were seventeen people murdered and seventeen injured at the scene. The suspect, Nikolas Cruz, was arrested at Coral Springs an hour later after the incident (Lombardi, 2018). It was at a time when parkland residents were demanding measures for gun control in the area. Additionally, it was recorded as the worst high school mass killing through rifle after the Columbine High School massacre that happened in 1999. When Cruz was presented to a grand jury and charged with the case, he was first placed in an isolation cell to watch his suicidal moves. However, when Cruz’s history was followed up, he had developmental disabilities, which made him dislike people. At school, he was reported as threatening other students that he would harm them.  Nikolas Cruz acquired the rifle legally by buying from a Coral Springs gun store. He had previously undergone mental health assessment, and it was clear that he had low chances of harming himself and others. When he was aligned to court, he admitted his actions and refused to go ‘no guilty’ stage. Cruz attacked a jail officer while in jail on November 18 when he was asked to stop dragging his shoes while walking in the jail’s dayroom. He was charged with a bail of two hundred thousand dollars. The court was failing to take into consideration his mental health to determine his state. Prior examination on Nikolas Cruz did not show clear results of him being mentally ill. However, most of his behaviors indicated mental health instability. He talked much about guns and posted threats on social media concerning gun violence. He was also found in possession of many dangerous weapons. References Lombardi, D. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of Online News Headlines: A Case of the Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting.   Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoneman_Douglas_High_School_shooting

UK SOURCE HARVARD REFERENCES 15000 words Describe and Evaluate the Effectiveness of Behavioural Therapies” Ensure your essay is logically structured (introduction, main body & conclusion), and be fully referenced throughout and accompanied by an accurate bibliography. described at least two behavioural therapies applied these therapies to at least one abnormal behaviour evaluated behavioural therapies in terms of its effectiveness described one form of cognitive behavioural therapy evaluated cognitive behavioural therapy in terms of its effectiveness identified and explained the relevant ethical issues related to the use of behavioural therapies used appropriate psychological terminology with reference to classical and operant conditioning and social learning theory correctly referenced work using the Harvard system Main body: For the main body, you will need to include key research and show how these illustrate the processes of learning within the therapies you select. You should describe these succinctly, using appropriate psychological terminology. You should describe at least two behavioural therapies, clearly explaining the processes used and show how they change behaviour. You will need to explain the relevance and usefulness of the therapies in terms of how successful they are in terms of treating maladaptive behaviours. To evaluate the evidence, you should include the following: Consider the effectiveness of behavioural therapies – for example, you could compare and contrast the different exposure therapies and comment on how they compare in terms of effectiveness. You should use specific research examples to illustrate the effectiveness of the therapies. Consider the limitations associated with behavioural therapies – compare behavioural therapies with other treatments, particularly CBT; discuss the development of CBT and consider whether it has improved overall effectiveness; consider the limitation of behavioural therapies. Consider ethical issues associated with behavioural therapies – use specific examples to illustrate the ethical issues; use comparative techniques to help you analyse how ethical the therapies are in relation to each other (eg, compare &      contrast the exposure therapies); discuss whether CBT is more ethical than behavioural therapies. For more information on Behavioral Therapies read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviour_therapy

Traumatic Brain Injury Research paper of 6-7 pages (approximately 1600-1750 words) e. Just needed assistance in organizing the paper. Must be able to run the final product on Grammarly and Turnitin.  For more information on Brain Injury read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_Injury

After you have completed the readings,  post your initial response to the following discussion. Your post should respond to all parts of the topic(s) in complete sentences and should extend the discussion of the group by including original thoughts or ideas with support from multiple academic outside sources and/or course materials, correctly using APA style, both in-text and complete reference at the end of the post. After you have submitted your initial post, review other posts, and respond to multiple classmates. Your response to other classmates should ask follow-up questions or provide additional ideas that expand on the topic. Be sure to post your responses over multiple days throughout the unit week as this helps promote a real discussion. Refer to your Discussion Board Rubric for a specific grading explanation. Selecting the Appropriate Intervention Strategy Describe why the articulation of a hypothesis is essential in the development of an effective program. Examine how a hypothesis is different from a hunch. Describe the differences. Describe what the statements,  “hypothesis is a series of ends/means statement” and “program evaluation begins with the development of a hypothesis” mean. Describe how you actually develop both the lower and higher level statements in the hypothesis. *** FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS GIVEN*** ***350 MINIMUM WORDS NOT INCLUDING RESOURCE PAGE*** *** I DO NOT NEED A COVER PAGE JUST RESOURCES*** For more information on Intervention Strategy read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_intervention