social science

Diversity and Ethics Cover LetterDue: Week 9Points: 125Skill(s) Being Assessed: Problem SolvingCriteria for Success: In this assignment, you will:Thoughtfully reflect on past experiences as they relate to consideration of diverse and ethical perspectives.Identify relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed.Apply diverse and ethical perspectives to a decision-making process. Provide specific examples from personal experience or the scenario.Articulate the value of incorporating diverse and ethical perspectives when making decisions.Describe ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives. Include concrete examples from the identified problem.Write in a professional manner using proper grammar and spelling.What to submit/deliverables: Word document downloaded from Chapter 9 in the webtext and uploaded to the Week 9 Assignment in Blackboard.What is the value of doing this assignment? This assignment gives you an opportunity to practice the skill of problem solving. It will show that you can use diverse and ethical perspectives when solving a problem and making a decision. Problem solving is a universal skill and one you will continue to refine as you progress throughout your career. This assignment asks you to use what you’ve learned in weeks 7–9 of the course about actively problem solving and considering diverse perspectives. Worried about where to start? The good news is that you’ve already laid the foundation throughout the course in your webtext readings, videos, and Learn sections in Blackboard.Your goal for this assignment is to: Practice your problem solving skill. You will do this by writing a cover letter that demonstrates your knowledge of diverse and ethical perspectives and how they could be applied to the job you are applying for.What you need to complete this assignment:Cover letter template, provided in the webtext.Downloaded cover letter from the webtext.Steps to complete: Complete the template for Assignment 3 in Chapter 9 of the webtext. You will be asked to write a 3-paragraph cover letter to the head of the diversity and ethics committee.STEP 1:Describe how your background and unique perspectives would be a valuable addition to the team.STEP 2: Give an example of a time when you intentionally looked at other diverse and ethical perspectives in order to make a better/more ethical decision.STEP 3: Answer the following questions based on the scenario below:In the graduate program at Herringbone University, students are allowed only one missed class per semester or they face academic discipline. Three female students have approached you as the diversity and ethics officer with a concern about the policy. They explain that they all have young children (as do many students in the program), and getting childcare during class times is difficult because some of the classes don’t end until 8:00 in the evening. They feel the policy is unfair, especially since the university doesn’t offer any support, leniency in policy, or childcare options. In addition, the location of the university (an upper middle class neighborhood where most children have at least one parent at home) is not where most students live (a neighborhood where most children have two working parents or a single working parent).How would you approach this issue using diverse and ethical perspectives? Use specific examples from the scenario and your personal and professional life.Why is it important to consider diverse and ethical perspectives in this situation?How would you raise awareness and communicate the importance to others at your school in your role on the diversity and ethics committee?STEP 4: Your responses from Steps 1–3 will be combined into a template. Download this completed template by following the instructions in Chapter 9 in the webtext.

1. Compare and contrast Marx and Weber’s notion of class and class stratification2. Thinking about Max Weber’s three components of social class, answer the following two questions:If you were forced to choose between Weber’s three components of social class, which component would you choose to have for the rest of your life: property, prestige, or power? Why?How could you use that one component to gain the others?respond no.1I think Karl Marx and Marx Weber contradicted each other on the class nature particularly. Traditional measures were applied by other sociologists to analyze stratification. Karl Marx argued that class is decided by economic factors only. Whereas Weber argued that social stratification is not only determined by class and economic factors affecting relationships of class. According to Weber, Social class is comprised of prestige, power, and wealth or property. Weber worked half a century after Karl Marx. He derived his assumptions of stratification social ladder from three independent factors namely; power, class, and status. He treated these factors each independently but associated sources of power each with their various impacts on social life. Property is defined as wealth and comprises of owner’s factories or corporations and also the sole managers working in these structures. Weber describes power as the ability of an individual to have his way regardless of the prevailing resistance surrounding him. Prestige is described as an individual’s popularity and social honor in society.If I was to choose between the three components social by Weber, I would choose property. The property comprises economic resources that include; businesses, land, and buildings that generate wealth. According to Weber, economic power or wealth is the foundation of social class. However, he identifies social power and prestige as crucial class markers. For people to be accepted into classes of higher status, they should hail from prominent families that may not be wealthy or maybe politically powerful. The property still stands out as a good choice. This is because property can be used as an instrument to acquire prestige and power. With wealth, people can buy the education they need to join a higher social class. Prestige can be built using property to champion good ideas resulting in the growth of an individual’s name positively in society. Wealth can also be utilized to acquire power. A wealthy person can afford to move around to avenues where they can meet powerful individuals in normal environments and exchange important information. Wealth can be used to sponsor a political candidate in numerous ways to put a political agenda of interest on the table. Currently, we are in a world where the property can open several doors and is therefore greatly respected.From the above research, Karl Marx and Marx Weber disagreed on social stratification and inequality. Karl Marx believed economic factors alone determined class while Marx Weber argued that Karl Marx’s points were not enough, he added prestige power and property to his theories. Of the three components of social stratification, I would choose wealth. This is because wealth dominates all the other two components. Despite the dominance of wealth, the two components are also important. Wealth has more importance because with wealth, an individual can acquire both prestige and power.respond no.2 ? i will give you later and plz respond me back asap?

T????????????????????ask: This 4 – 5 full page (not to exceed 6 pages) Philosophical Essay you will be writing due Week 7 is designed to be a thoughtful, reflective work. The 4 – 5 full pages does not include a cover page or a resource page. It will be your premier writing assignment focused on the integration and assessment relating to the course concepts. Your paper should be written based on the outline you submitted during week 4 combined with your additional thoughts and instructor feedback. You will use at least three scholarly/reliable resources with matching in-text citations and a resource page. All essays are double spaced, 12 New Times Roman font, paper title, along with all paragraphs indented five spaces.Description: You will pick one of the following topics only to do your paper on: According to Socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters? Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted? Would Socrates have been wrong to escape (CO3)? Consider the following philosophical puzzle: “If a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?” (1) How is this philosophical puzzle an epistemological problem? And (2) how would John???????????????????? Locke answer it (CO1)? https://intellectualessay.com/ Evaluate the movie, The Matrix, in terms of the philosophical issues raised with (1) skepticism and (2) the mind-body problem.Explain how the movie raises questions similar to those found in Plato’s and Descartes’ philosophy (CO5 & CO6). Do not give a plot summary of the movie – focus on the philosophical issues raised in the movie as they relate to Plato and Descartes. Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (1) How does this question relate to the Divine Command Theory of morality? (2) What are the philosophical implications associated with each option here (CO4)?Explain (1) the process by which Descartes uses skepticism to refute skepticism, and (2) what first principle does this lead him to? (3) Explain why this project was important for Descartes to accomplish (CO2). http://educatoressay.com Your paper will be written at a college level with an introduction, body paragraphs, a conclusion, along with in-text citations/resource page in proper formatting. Remember – any resource that is listed on the resource page must have an in-text citation in the paper to match or this is considered plagiari????????????????????sm.

Social Work ResearchWorksheet Critiques: Critical Appraisal of Two Research Articles(200 points, i.e., 20%)Submit to Blackboard by 11:59 a.m. on the day of Class 15 (5/06)From the articles provided in the materials folder for this week (week 6), choose one quantitative and one qualitative article.This the article “Social Cognition Enhancement Training for Schizophrenia: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial”1. Provide (proper) APA citations for each of your two articles below.2. Populate the tables below for each of your articles. You may expand the tables to fit your responses, but do not exceed three pages per article! Please be concise.Article #1 (Quantitative)Research Question/Literature Review:Rationale for the Study (what needs to be known and why?):Key Research Question(s):Guiding Theory or Conceptual Framework (note – if atheoretical, state that):Key Hypothesis(es):Does this study address a compelling question (yes/no/maybe; why/why not?):Research Design and SamplING:DESIGN:Describe the study design (experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational, etc.):SAMPLING:Theoretical Population (To whom does the study sample aim to generalize?):Sample:Sampling Strategy (e.g., random, convenience, criterion, snowball):Sample size and subgroup size(s) N/n’s = ?:If there were subgroups – were they equivalent (yes/no, why/not)?Were the needs and protection of special/vulnerable populations appropriately considered (yes/no, why/not)?How did the study handle issues of diversity/inclusion?Key characteristics of the sample (e.g., 90% male; mean age 22):Retention/attrition (e.g., proportion who completed treatment and/or outcomes):Research Measures:Key independent variable(s):How measured (including level of measurement – ratio, ordinal, etc; range of values)?Evidence of measure(s)’s reliability?-validity?Key dependent variable(s):How measured (including level of measurement – ratio, ordinal, etc; range of values)?Evidence of measure(s)’s reliability?–validity?

W????????????????????rite a paper (1,250-1,500 words) about one of the three topics below. (Your paper must be on one of these topics in order to receive credit). Your essay should be typed and double-spaced with one-inch margins. Use 12 point font. Your essay should refer to the readings and should include a works-cited page at the end (the works-cited page does not count towards the final word count). Your paper should also have an informative title.Topic 1. Does Kantianism provide a plausible theory of right conduct? If you think that it does, then (i) spell out the strongest objection that opponents of Kantianism can make and (ii) provide an argument that shows why this objection fails. If you think that it does not, then (i) spell out your objection to Kantianism, (ii) spell out the strongest response that proponents of Kantianism can make to your objection, and (iii) spell out a reply to this response. Topic 2: In non-life-and-death situations, is it morally permissible to eat animals that were killed for food? If you think that it is morally permissible to eat animals that were killed for food, then (i) spell out the strongest argument for your view, (ii) spell out the strongest objection that your opponents can make to your argument, and (iii) reply to your opponent’s objection.You should also clarify the scope of your view. For instance, do you think it is permissible for everyone to eat animals that were killed for food, or just some people? https://homeworkharbour.info/papers And if it is only permissible for certain people to eat animals that were killed for food, why is this permissible for them but not for others. If you think that it is morally impermissible to eat animals that were killed for food, then (i) spell out the strongest argument for your view, (ii) spell out the strongest objection that your opponents can make to your argument, and (iii) reply to your opponent’s objection. You should also clarify the scope of your view.Topic 3. Does Virtue Ethics provide a plausible theory of right conduct?If you think that it does, then (i) spell out the strongest objection that opponents of Virtue Ethics can make and (ii) provide an argument that shows why this objection you think that it does not, then (i) spell out your objection to Virtue Ethics, (ii) spell out the strongest response that proponents of Virtue Ethics can make to your objection, and (iii) spell out a reply to this response. Template1. IntroductionAimStrategy Roadmap* This is your opportunity to show that you can clearly lay out the blueprint for a big project. https://homeworkbay.info/content/ After reading the intro, your reader should have an excellent idea of what the paper will try to do and how it will try to do it.2. The View Under DiscussionLay out the view that you will be investigating- Say what motivates the view/lay out the theory of Lay out the theory of r????????????????????ight conduct. * This is your opportunity to show that you have mastered the view that you are talking about. After reading this section, it should be clear to your reader that you have a deep understanding of the major components of the view that you will be discussing. * If you are not writing about an ethical theory, this section can be pretty short and/or combined with Section 13.Spell out the strongest objection that opponents are likely to Make sure you explain the motivation behind the controversial premises, ., make sure that you explain the reasoning that leads to each Make sure you have stated the argument in a way that the premises support the conclusion. 4. Provide an argument that shows why the objection in section 3 fails. – Make sure you explain part of the argument you are responding to, ., are you objecting to a specific premise, are you going to argue that while all of the premises are true, the argument is invalid… – Make sure that you have stated your argument in a way that the premises support the conclusion.* These two sections give you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to extract, explain, and evaluate an argument; it should be clear to your reader what the argument in section 3 aims to show and it should be clear to your reader why your think that this argument ultimately fails. Option 2 and Option 33. Spell out your objection to the Make sure you explain the motivation behind the controversial premises, ., make sure that you explain the reasoning that leads to each Make sure you have stated the argument in a way that the premises support the conclusion.4. Provide an argument that tries to show why the objection in section 3 fails. – Make sure you explain which part of the argument your opponents are responding to, ., are they going to object to a specific premise, are they going to argue that while all of the premises are true, the argument is invalid… – Make sure that you have stated your argument in a way that the premises support the an argument that shows why the objection in section 4 Make sure you explain which part of the argument you are responding to, ., are you going to object to a specific premise, are you going to argue that while all of the premises are true, the argument is invalid… –Make sure that you have stated your argument in a way that the premises support the conclusion.* These three sections give you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to extract, explain, and evaluate an argument; it should be clear to your reader what the argument in section 3 aims to show, why your opponents think that this argument is unsound, and why you think that your opponent’s argument ultimately ConclusionBriefly sum up what you hav????????????????????e done.

What’s the best way to keep intruders fromentering your home?• A: Put LEGO® bricks all over the floor!Warning • As I mentioned already, some ofthis content can be triggering for individuals who have endured trauma or have been victims of crime.• Please take care of yourself at all times. If you need to exit the class or turn off your camera at any point, please do so. Your well-being and safety are more important than anything.24-Hour Hotlin1.888. 288-9221Chapter 14: Preventing Victimization with Environmental CriminologyVictimology and Crime Prevention • Early victimologists concerned with describing thevictim’s role in a criminal event and the degree to which the victim was responsible? Critiqued as “victim blaming”• Paradigm shift:? Victimologists now work toward identifying risk factors for victimization and developing theories to explain how and why targets are selectedReview of Key Theoretical Perspectives of Environmental Criminology• Rational Choice Theory? Emphasizes purposive decision making and bounded rationality• Crime Pattern Theory? Elaborates on the movement patterns of offenders and the ways in which hot spots develop (i.e., nodes, paths, edges, awareness space)• Routine Activities Theory? Focuses on the context of the crime event, particularly on the roles of key actors and places and the people and factors that influence and control the actors and settingsReview of Rational Choice Theory • Offenders’ decisions are based on weighing risks,rewards, and efforts• Three primary assertions:1) Offenders have goals in mind when they commit crimes; they take potential risks (costs) and rewards (benefits) into account2) Risks and rewards vary across different types of crime3) Offenders consider the setting in which the crime will occurReview of Crime Pattern Theory • Human behaviors show regularities when vieweacross time and space? Individual offenders, decision rules, movement patterns related to places, crime concentrations• Crime events and criminal opportunities can result from routine, noncriminal patterns of behavior• Crime events can occur when offenders and targets converge in time and spacReview of Routine Activities Theory • When (1) a motivated offender and (2) a suitabletarget converge in (3) an environment lacking guardianship, then (4) an opportunity for victimization is created• Theory used to devise crime prevention strategies based on reducing opportunities for victimization? Accomplished by manipulating one of the three essential elementsEnvironmental Criminology • Underlying principle? By recognizing these three theoretical premises (rational choice theory, crime pattern theory, and routine activities theory), the environment or setting in which crime occurs can be changed so that criminal behaviors at these locations can be reduced• Three crime prevention perspectives based on environmental criminology:1) Defensible space2) Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED)3) Situational crime prevention (SCP)1) Defensible Space • Developed by the architect Oscar Newman (1972)• Links criminal opportunities to characteristics of the “built environment”• Crime prevention can be accomplished by designing environments that strengthen places

Briefly describe at least one strength and also at least one weakness of Universal Human Rights approaches, such as embodied in UN Declarations.

n Chapter 7 of the Webtext, you learned the importance of reframing your negative self-talk into positive self-talk. Now, follow the three-step process on page 7.3 of the Webtext to reframe your own negative self-talk into positive self-talk. Walk us through each step of the process as you went from negative self-talk to positive self-talk.(Please be sure not to reuse an example that was already given in the Webtext.)Answer the question in at least 2 paragraphs. Each paragraph should be 5-7 sentences with limited grammatical errors (total 10-14 sentences). Also, ensure your peer response is at least 3-5 sentences.

Human Diversity and Human RightsDisability StudiesNEED RESPONSES FOR TWO STUDENT’S POSTSResponse posts are expected to be at least 200 words eachRequired Textbooks:Garcia-Irate, E., McConkey, R., & Gilligan, R. (2016). Disability and human rights: global perspectives. New York: Palgrave.Obrien, R. (2001). Crippled Justice. The History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.DISCUSSION WEEK 8 POST QUESTIONS WAS: In reviewing healthcare policies and practices, what underlying assumptions do you see revealed or reinforced regarding disability and disabled people? How do these underlying assumptions manifest themselves, and what can be done to counteract them? How can disabled people advocate for better healthcare options without subtly reinforcing the medical model of disability.

What are some of the preconditions of terrorism?