social science

Read below content in URLhttps://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/leadership-ethics/resources/the-ceo-of-starbucks-and-the-practice-of-ethical-leadership/Now AnswerPlease answer all the questions Creating Community: Did Johnson use Starbucks’ shared values as the cornerstone of his decision making after the arrests? Did his decision to close all Starbucks stores for unconscious bias training and to create a new “Third Space Policy” align with Starbucks’ mission and goals? Did his handling of the incident promote positive relationships between employees and customers? Did it encourage a sense of connectedness and shared values? Encouraging Ethical Conduct: Did Johnson openly acknowledge that his decision was based in ethics and morality? Did his apology and actions promote awareness of an ethical issue? Did it create a positive or negative difference in the communities Starbucks serves? Did it make a positive or negative difference for Starbucks employees and customers? Showing Discipline in One’s Role: Does Johnson explicitly accept responsibility for the incident and provide direction for a course correction? Does he identify ways to collaborate with others when necessary? Does he show he understands what his role is in fixing this problem? Clarifying Culture: Did Johnson clarify his values and the company’s values in his apology and with his subsequent actions? Did Johnson’s apology and follow-up actions uphold Starbucks’ mission and core values? Did he identify gaps between stated and actual values? Did Johnson’s apology help Starbucks employees figure out if their personal values align with the company’s? Designing Ethical Systems: Did Johnson’s actions have impact beyond Starbucks? Did they sent a precedent for other companies to follow? Did his apology create a conversation about unconscious bias in the workplace? How do his apology and the subsequent follow-up actions compare to other companies and CEOs that have faced similar problems?

Many workers across America have had a negative, perhaps even slightly hostile, experience with workers’ compensation and have had the need to dispute certain aspects such as compensation, medical bill payment, and level of disability rating among other issues.For this assignment, write an essay describing the benefit of the dispute process for the state that you live and/or work in. Think about these questions when writing your essay:Why is the dispute process even needed?What are common causes of injured workers disputing the level of benefits or compensation?What are the workers’ rights and responsibilities when dealing with disputes?What is the root cause of disputes? Is it a basic viewpoint of the accident situation in general, or is it a lack of communication, or inaccurate communication between many different groups?How does the dispute process fit into the claims management process?Your essay should be a minimum of four pages. At a minimum, the resources you identified in your Unit IV annotated bibliography should be used in your paper. The annotated bibliography itself will not be included as a part of the assignment, just the resources you identified. All sources used, including your textbook, must be cited and referenced following APA guidelines, and your essay should be formatted in APA style to include a title page and reference page.NOTE: Much of the dispute process may be reviewed on your state’s web page. Remember, the assignment is to show the perceived benefits of the dispute process, not the actual description or purpose of the process.

Write an 800-900 word paper that discusses how your personal model of leadership and leadership style may be applied in your work and how it compares to servant leadership and other models.Part One:Discuss your personal model of leadership and how you might apply it in your role as a doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse.Analyze how your personal model reflects a practice of servant leadership.Compare servant leadership to two other leadership models.Discuss how leaders implement each of the models and how they fit with your personal model.Contrast the effectiveness of these models to bring about change in an organization.Part Two:Evaluate how your personal model of leadership works in conjunction with your leadership style.Develop an action plan using SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely) with an evaluation of personal development to work on two areas of personal improvement for your leadership style. The plan must include at least two SMART goals.

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:What is ultimate reality?What is the nature of the universe?What is a human being?What is knowledge?What is your basis of ethics?What is the purpose of your existence?

Some organizations prohibit workers from bringing certain kinds of devices into the workplace, such as cameras, cell phones, and USB drives. Some businesses require employees to use clear or see-through backpacks when carrying personal items. What other devices might not be allowed in certain facilities, and why would they be restricted? The video on Google’s Data Center may give you some ideas to write about for this assignment.Minimum of 300 words with 3 paragraphs.

Race, Class, and Gender https://littletonpublicschools.net/sites/default/files/HHS-2015-Eng-10%20Honors%20Summer%20reading_1.pdf Arguably, any text reflects something about the impact of race, class, or gender-related issues of the time in which that text is produced. And very often all three perspectives are useful and applicable. You have studied the Multicultural, Marxist, and Feminist theories. It is now clear that all the texts reflect on at least one, if not all, of the following matters: race (or differences between cultures), social class (or differences in income and education level), gender (including stereotypes, different communication styles, societal expectations). Your essay must be based on one of these three critical theories as it applies to one short story of your choice. You do not have to think which theory would be the most relevant to the short story of your choice. You can choose to analyze just one element, or character, or scene in a short story to which issues of race, class, or gender can pertain. Feel free to use as many theory-related buzz words in your discussion posts and your essays. Ideally, you should compile a list of buzz words for each critical perspective from each of the model student essays that illustrate each theory. Then, try to write in the same vein about the short story of your choice. So, you should write an essay, in which you provide an interpretation of the function of one element or one character in a story based on one specific critical theory. Choose any of the previously read stories, except “I Stand Here Ironing” (unless you come up with something entirely different from what is covered in the two sample essays). Regardless which theory you choose to use, your essay has to be PERSUASIVE, therefore having an argumentative CLAIM as your thesis statement. THESIS A thesis is the central idea of an essay, articulated in the thesis statement. There are three essential requirements for your thesis statement: the topic of the essay: one element of the story (a character, a scene, a detail, a setting, a motif) the purpose for the analysis: persuasive the focus of the analysis: your interpretation of the element’s function in the story based on one critical theory INTERPRETATION An interpretation is an opinion. You should see this assignment as a persuasive essay in which you make an argument for your opinion of the story, in which your argumentation would be entirely based on one of the three critical theories you’ve just studied. The body of the essay should present at least three to four major points in support of your interpretation (opinion), all of which should be supported with evidence from the story. This support could be presented in several different ways: a summary of relevant events, a paraphrase of passages, or a direct quotation. You should then follow up with an explanation of how the evidence supports your interpretation. In short, each point made in your argument should consist of three things: interpretation based on one of the critical theories support (evidence – whether a summary, paraphrase, or direct quotation) explanation (a connection between the support and the critical theory) INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSION The introduction of the essay should do the following: (1) identify the author’s name and the story’s title, (2) summarize the elements of the story relevant to the interpretation based on one critical theory, (3) present thesis statement. The conclusion of the essay should do the following: (1) revisit thesis without merely restating it verbatim, (2) tie thesis in with the story’s major relevant pieces, (3) explain the broader significance of the critical interpretation of your choice. STOP: Is your essay AT LEAST 700 words? If no, do NOT submit. Your essay will be returned with a zero and no comments. You will also fail to meet Gordon Rule Requirements.

In 1,500-1,800 words, do the following:Using a selection of outside secondary sources as well as your own reading, pick any course text to analyze in terms of cultural poetics.Summarize and describe specific aspects of the historical context that you assert have significance to the meaning of the text, then interpret the meaning of the text in terms of those aspects.Consider how new historicism/cultural poetics is different from modernist and formalist approaches, and explain how that postmodern orientation might affect a reader’s interpretation of the meaning of the work.For this assignment, be sure to consult and cite at least 3 outside sources that provide relevant historical context for your analysis.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.The summary and description of aspects of the historical context that has significance to the meaning of the text is clear and comprehensive. Three sources are used. Interpretation of the meaning of the text in terms of those aspects is completely supported by the facts.Explanation of how historicism/cultural poetics might affect a reader’s interpretation of the meaning of the work, is comprehensive and exceptional.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Pick one of the following terms for your research: Stakeholder, corporate citizenship, reputation, corporate governance, or executive compensation.DEFINITION: a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.SUMMARY: Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the 300 word range. Be sure to note the article’s author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.DISCUSSION: Using 600 words, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts and opinions. This is the most important part of the assignment.REFERENCES: All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission–in APA format.

InstructionsThis week, locate two education-related presentations that interest you. In the presentations you select, you must be able to both hear and see the speaker. You may locate your presentations in the Library or other sources of your choice.After watching the two presentations, respond to the following questions for each speaker: What was effective about this speaker’s style? What did this speaker do well that you would also like to do in your own public speaking? In what area was the speaker the weakest? What is something you made note of to avoid in your own public speaking while watching these presentations? Critique the speaker’s body language, use of hand gestures or movement, audience eye contact, nervous twitches, posture, filler words, etc. What was effective? What was not effective? Which of these two presenters was the better public speaker from your point of view? What makes you say so, based on what you know from this week about best practices in public speaking?Length: 3-4 pagesReferences: Practice citing multimedia sources by providing APA citations for both presentations that you viewed, both in-text and in a reference list in APA format at the end of your paper.Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards

Locate a job description in a local(Charlotte,NC)regional(North Carolina) or national job search engine that advertises a human services-related position working with either victims of sexual offenses or violent crime or working with the offenders of one or both of these crimes. Reflecting on your personality, life experiences, and skill sets, which would you be more comfortable working with (either directly or indirectly) as a human services professional: Victim or offender? Explain your conclusions. Please include the job posting link and copied and pasted job description with your submission. Introduction and conclusion and Reference page minimum 2 scholarly