social science

In what ways has your study of sociology to date reflected Comte’s ideas of statics and dynamics?  What courses reflected which?This is my first semester back so I have no prior courses to reflect on

There is a difference between scientific and non-scientific knowledge. You will need to watch, listen, or read the news from whatever source you choose (TV, internet, radio). Pay attention to the conversation or what you are reading and focus on when the article, commentators, or guests use statistics or facts in their argument. Is what you heard scientific or non-scientific knowledge? What is the difference between scientific and non-scientific knowledge? How are you able to determine if what you heard was scientific or non-scientific knowledge? Did the information that you read, saw, or heard convince you of the argument?

NEED AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHYtopic:  What explains charismatic leadership? Should we consider charisma a power instrument?stand: I believe that charisma is an essential part for any leader they need to convince people. They need to convince people that what they want is the best even when it’s not. Throughout history plenty of leaders who had the wrong idea were able to convince the mass to throw their charisma. For example, Hitler was elected to power. Threw his personality, he spoke with confidence, he told people what they wanted to hear and they changed the course of history. requirementEach annotation is to be 150 words (+/- ten words) of text, excluding the bibliographic reference itself.At least three sources are to be scholarly articles and two either scholarly books or a chapter from a scholarly book.Otherwise, any sources that you deem to be credible (see “Evaluating sources” in the Purdue Online Writing Lab – Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Evaluation sources ofinformation.https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/evaluating_sources_of_information/index.html) are acceptable,such as government reports or statistical databases.The annotation must describe both the content of the source, and describe how the source is relevant to your essay topic.NEED 5 DIFFERENT SOURCESHAS TO BE ON THE TOPICCHOOSE 5 DIFFERENT SOURCES THAT PROVE MY VIEW NEED TO WRIGHT 150 WORDS ON EACH EXPLAING WHAT THE SORCE WAS TALKING ABOUTexampleEhrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. Henry Holt and Company.In this book of nonfiction based on the journalist’s experiential research, Ehrenreich attempts to ascertain whether it is currently possible for an individual to live on a minimum-wage in America. Taking jobs as a waitress, a maid in a cleaning service, and a Walmart sales employee, the author summarizes and reflects on her work, her relationships with fellow workers, and her financial struggles in each situation. An experienced journalist, Ehrenreich is aware of the limitations of her experiment and the ethical implications of her experiential research tactics and reflects on these issues in the text. The author is forthcoming about her methods and supplements her experiences with scholarly research on her places of employment, the economy, and the rising cost of living in America. Ehrenreich’s project is timely, descriptive, and well-researched.The annotation above both summarizes and assesses the book in the citation. The first paragraph provides a brief summary of the author’s project in the book, covering the main points of the work. The second paragraph points out the project’s strengths and evaluates its methods and presentation. This particular annotation does not reflect on the source’s potential importance or usefulness for this person’s own research

Students of most medical schools in the US, Canada, and the UK take an oath or pledge on graduation which is modeled on or derived from the Hippocratic Oath. This is not common practice in Irish Medical Schools. Discuss briefly what you see to be the advantages and disadvantages of taking such an oath or pledge on graduation. On balance, do you believe Irish medical schools should oblige their graduates to take an oath or pledge on graduation? If so, state briefly what you would include in such a pledge. If not, what alternative mechanisms would you propose to ensure graduates adhere to key ethical principles.Marks will also be awarded for overall presentation, coherence, and evidence of deeper thought/ reading around the topic (up to a maximum of 20 marks).The essay should be not less than 2,000 and not more than 2,500 words. You should cite (in either the Vancouver or Harvard format) at least 10 and not more than 20 references you have read in the course of preparing your essay.Plagiarism will result in an automatic failure of the module with a return of a zero mark for the continuous assessment component. It may also lead to the institution of disciplinary procedures under fitness to practice procedures.

Describe and compare the three main theoretical frameworks in Sociology including structural functionalism (or functionalism), conflict theory, and symbolic interaction. What sociologists contributed to the development of each perspective? From your point of view, which perspective makes the most sense in terms of understanding society and human social behavior?Be sure to include a title page, references, and three additional pages of written text. Double space your papers and include one inch margins..

select a film of your choice to discuss and write about your reaction to a film and its social justice topicInclude topics such as:How does the filmmaker use the genre to tell the story?How does the film comment on the social justice issues?How do they develop the characters? Are the characters multi-dimensional and believable, or flat and stereotypical?How is the narrative shaped to explore various themes?Was the tone serious or lighthearted? Emotional or analytical?Is the filmmaker successful in depicting and commenting on issues and what is your response to this presentation?Was anything confusing or unexpected?Preparation for your response paper would include:Watch the film to make notes on scenes that you thought were significant.Noting what you reacted to, and what you liked or disliked.Noting memorable scenes or depiction of issues in the film.

1. Give your review a special headline or phrase to describe its “tension.” Grab the reader’s attention or entice people to read your review.                                            1 pointFocus the paper                                                                                                                        1 pointNear the beginning tell the reader all the obligatorystuff – the title of the movie, the year it was made, the type of movie it is [comedy, documentary, tragedy, biography, etc.]  In one sentence or two, explain verysimply how the movie portrays racism  – not necessarily what happens. [Remember your focus is on racism in America and how it impacts the characters.]Highlight the understanding of “religion” [this entails beliefs and values in the movie it may not be necessarily connecter with or to “church.”                                                                                                                                                                                                    3 pointsWhat characters believe it without question?  Who challenges or assumes another understanding of the situation?  What are the implications of the ending?  Does this movie support or undermine racism as you understand it?Describe a key moment or idea.                                                                          2 pointsGo into detail about something significant that touched, intrigued or bothered you.  What scene or scenes do you think was/were pivotal in understanding the real issue? Capture the “essence” of the movie as it relates to Racism and Religion [Values] in America.   Give your own opinion. Evaluate the movie’s presentation of racism in America                                                                                                                                    2 points  Do you agree or disagree with the portrayal of racism or religion? EXPLAIN WHY you agree or disagree.  Was the portrayal of the situation believable?  Did the movie deepen your understanding of racism?  Justify your opinion, [that opinion should grow out of what you wrote in the rest of the review].  Give concrete reasons to support your position.Communicating across the curriculum                                                                              1  point

PRACTICAL THEOLOGY OF CHAPLAINCY: THESIS AND OUTLINE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEWThe unique ministerial setting of chaplains requires a clear articulation and regular inspection of your theology. This uniqueness includes a context of people from diverse, ecumenical, and pluralistic backgrounds. It is common to serve among a population of non-Christians. Chaplains must avoid the temptation of sinking to the lowest common denominator of faith/religion/spirituality. Calling, character, competency, care, and conviction are critical elements of your theology and practice of ministry.  This assignment will help you anchor and apply your theology. Perhaps you will review this paper regularly, as you serve in the field of chaplaincy ministry.   INSTRUCTIONSYou will submit the title of the proposed paper along with the thesis statement and outline. The title must directly reflect the foundations of your thesis. The paper must contain an introduction, 5 main body points, and conclusion.For the outline, use the following as a main body point: Theology of Chaplaincy Calling, Theology of Chaplaincy Character, Theology of Chaplaincy Competency, Theology of Chaplaincy Care, and Theology of Chaplaincy Conviction. Each main body point will be:•    Defined from a systematic theological tenet: What systematic theological tenet best defines the main body point?•    Detailed from your denominational/endorser guidelines: How does your denominational/endorser detail the main body point?•    Described through your chaplaincy practice of ministry: How is the main body point practiced in your ministry.The thesis and rough outline must be completed in current Turabian format, with footnotes.Submit the title of the proposed paper along with the thesis statement and outline. The title must directly reflect the foundations of your thesis. The paper must contain an introduction, 5 main body points, and conclusion.Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the TurnItIn plagiarism tool.TEXTBOOKS TO BE USED AND QUOTED (ATLEAST 8 SOURCES IS NEEDED WHICH THE FOUR BELOW must BE INCLUDED among the 8 }

Analyze the cultural background of Jesus’ encounter with the Samaritanwoman at the well in John 4. Address the significance of Jesus’ interaction with her as a womanand as a Samaritan. Describe how Jesus displayed cultural sensitivity towards her and offerapplication to people from different time periods. Explain how the passage leads one to modelsimilar characteristics of cultural sensitivity towards individuals of different cultural backgrounds.This essay must be 14 – 16 pages in Turabian format with footnotes as well as an annotatedbibliography. The sources must include at least three primary sources and a minimum of eightsecondary sources with an Annotated Bibliography.

Describe how the Enlightenment value of science is/is not evidenced in contemporary U.S. people’s thinking and behavior.  Thought and behavior in relation to the Covid pandemic or global climate are possibilities.