social science

The prompt is as shown, with each page of the paper being on different viewpoints of the prompt.  1) Explaining Aristotle’s argument 2) Explaining Marx’s argument 3) Explain which of those views you agree with, and why. Your answer has to include a description of some defect in the best argument offered for the answer you think is wrong. (If you agree with Aristotle, you have to say how Marx is logically wrong.) 4) Explain your own view of the nature of the best human life. And you have to argue why your view is correct.

On April 3, 1901 Ellen White speaks to the General Conference Session.  You will her appeal from p. 23 in the (Middle Column Center) that begins “The Chair…” and ends on p. 27 on the (Left Column Center) that ends “God help us to submit to Jesus Christ…”  READ HER APPEAL AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: Provided the context to this General Conference, What is the occasion of the appeal? What makes EGW’s appeal significant at this instance coming from the hardship of the 1890s?  What sort of influence did EGW have at this point in the Seventh-day Adventist Church that might have been different from the origins of the church?

What is violence? Do you think self-defense is violent? Why or why not? Use at least one of the readings to back up your answer.

Watch Dr. Tatum discuss when children first become aware of their own race or ethnicity. After her son came home and asked her why his skin was brown, she started asking the school when and how conversations about race come up. In her discussions that ensued with her son, she focused on shaping the narrative of the history of Black people in the United States to one of resistance to victimization. In your Discussion, use the following questions as a guide. You do not have to answer all of the questions, and you are free to go beyond these questions if it adds to the discussion. Feel free to share personal experiences if you feel comfortable. Your discussion post should be 1-2 paragraphs.   1/ What is the difference between being color-blind, and color-silent? 2/ When did you first become aware of your own race or ethnicity? 3/ Did conversations about race come up at school? At home? In a different social context? How did you feel about those conversations at the time? 4/ Using what you’ve learned in this week’s unit: Why do you think it is important that we talk to children and adolescents about race?

Explain the role of religion in contemporary Western societies by comparing Europe and the United States. Discuss afterwards the status of Islam (political, legal cultural) in these societies with particular emphasis on the recognition of Islam as a religious community and the integration of Muslims.

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following: 1) In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care. 2) In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it. 3) In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: 1) What is ultimate reality? 2) What is the nature of the universe? 3) What is a human being? 4) What is knowledge? 5) What is your basis of ethics? 6) What is the purpose of your existence? Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Men and Masculinity 1. What issues discussed in the audio/film, Tough Guise,(I attached)  in your opinion has the most impact facing men and the topic of masculinity in our society? 2. How can we, as an individual and as a society, address the factors presented in the film, Tough Guise? 3. What are the social and emotional issues facing males in today’s society who embrace feminist and equity principals? Please answer the question (minimum 250 words),

Case Analysis Format Read and understand the case or question assigned. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the legal concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one heading to each following outline topic: Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant] Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case] Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?] Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns] Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers. Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?] Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]  Conclusion:  Each of these cases has a court ruling. Do you agree with the court’s decision (why or why not?). From a Christian prospective, how does this decision impact Christianity and society? If the impact is negative, what recommendations would you make to overcome that impact? Do significant research outside of the book and demonstrate that you have in a very obvious way. This refers to research beyond the legal research. This involves something about the parties or other interesting related area. Show something you have discovered about the case, parties or other important element from your own research. Be sure this is obvious and adds value beyond the legal reasoning of the case. Dedicate a  paragraph or 2 to each of the case question(s) immediately following the case, if there are any. Be sure to state and fully answer the questions in the assignment description. Quality in terms of substance, form, grammar and context. Be entertaining! Use graphs and tables to emphasize or enhance the case if you like. Wrap up with a Conclusion at the end of the Case Analysis. This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and also your recommendations on the court’s ruling. Include citations on the slides and a reference slide with your sources. Use APA style citations and references. Submit your assignment. Please follow Case Analysis for both cases. And  Thanks!

Critically evaluate the extent to which the original objectives of the employment tribunal and particularly fair access to justice for employees, may have been compromised, by the introduction of the fee regime and latterly by the Covid 19 pandemic.

Discuss the actions you have taken to protect yourself in the event of a natural disaster.  How have you prepared for the inevitable?  Discuss the actions you have taken to protect yourself and deal with the difficulties against city stresses, and/or living in the country.