social science

Assigned Readings from the TextWorld’s WisdomCh. 6 “Christianity” selections 1-36Other Assigned Readings“Judaism in the Bible: Prophesy and the Apocalypse, 600-165BCE” Preview the documentJeffrey Burton, “Christ and the Power of Evil” in The Prince of Darkness.My dear friends, happy Week 6 :)This week will have two discussion boards:  The first one will focus on the reading content and the second one will delve into the main components of our writing projects and aim at offering peer-reviews to each other.This first board will be assigned a letter grade, and the second one will be graded as complete/incomplete.  To receive full credit, we will need to complete both discussion boards.Discussion Board 1 Questions:1. Why do bad things happen to good people? Drawing only on the course content, what is the Christian response, and how does that contrast with a previous tradition in the course? (up to 300 words)2. Please compare and contrast Jesus and Socrates as wisdom teachers and martyrs for their message. Where do they overlap?  Where do they differ most? (up to 300 words)Once you post your answers, please use the 3C+Q model to respond to at least one other post.  When you engage with someone else’s post, please only address one of their answers.Love you all!Cheers,

1.  You had a Western Bacon with cheese, a large order of French fries, and a 12 oz milk shake for lunch at 12 noon.  You did not eat or drink anything except water after that until the next day at 10 AM.  Describe the sequence of events that goes on in your body in that 22 hours.   For the first hour:  talk about what is happening in your body after you eat that meal?  What is the process of digestion and absorption of the macronutrients?  What enzymes and hormones are at work?  What pathways are going to be activate and turned off?  How do the pathways an organs/tissues work together to handle that load of food?  Use these questions to help you answer the sequences of events below:  For the next 2 hours after that, what is going on in your body?  Metabolism of nutrients? Hormones? Tissues/pathways?   For the next 3 hours after that?  What is going on at 5 to 6 hours after that?  10 hours after the lunch and over night?   When you wake up at 6 AM the next morning until you eat again at 10AM?      2.  You decided to run a 10K (6.2 miles) race and you have not been training for it and it will take you about 2 hours.  Describe what is going to happen in your body in its fuel use during different times of the run as you run at a pace of 3 miles per hour.  Think of the nutrients, tissues, pathways, hormones, etc. that are going to be involved in the first 10 minutes, at one hour, and at 1:45 min into the race.

ead the HBR Case: Blake Sports Apparel and Switch Activewear: Bringing the Executive Team Together by B. Groysbert and K. Connolly BadenCase Debrief Paper Requirements:1. Evaluate and discuss, did Barker have the “right” people in the right roles on the executive team? If not, what changes do you recommend? If so, how/why?2. Discuss, did Barker effectively structure and lead the team? If not, what should be changed? If so, how/why?3. When working with a team that is both high-performing and dysfunctional what would be the “right” strategy for driving a change in organizationalculture?4. What is the take-away value of this case when applying it to a team/group/organization? –* Have you observed or experienced similar dysfunctions? Concisely describe similar observations/experiences you’ve had and discuss how the lessons from this case could be applied.Must be APA and only cite academic sources (total of 3)The HBR case study will be provided to you

videos:  1. https://www.closertotruth.com/interviews/4100 Now that you have some experience writing and thinking about philosophy, I want to try a more open-ended discussion prompt for the remainder of the term, allowing you to key in on the most interesting and controversial claims from the videos. Each discussion needs to be about that week’s assigned videos and reading. 1.  Write about a claim from the videos that you found surprising. You should paraphrase the claim and any deductive arguments, clearly identifying the conclusion and main supporting premises, or inductive evidence that the author of the claim provided in support. Then you should say why you found the claim surprising. Would someone with an opposing viewpoint to your find the claim less surprising? Explain. 2. Very often the people being interviewed in our videos give arguments to support their conclusions. An argument is a series of premises that are supposed to provide reasons for accepting the conclusion. Describe, in detail, an argument from the video for a conclusion you disagreed with. Say what you think might be wrong with the argument. Do the premises fail to deductively entail or inductively support the conclusion? Or is a premise outright false? (Note well: stating that you disagree with the conclusion does not tell me what is wrong with the argument). 3. Now identify an argument for a conclusion you are inclined to agree with. Describe the argument. Since you agree with the conclusion, you have a motivation to defend the argument. Think about how someone might attack the argument and try to preempt their attack.

A description of the patterns you see in the data. Did you notice any differences between the heterosexual-identified respondents’ answers and the non-heterosexual-identified respondents’ answers? Any differences among the respondents in each of these two groups? Are there any differences according to age, gender, and ethnicity? (300-500 words)

Research Questions1. How do adults describe the impacts of high school music education on their intellectual developments?2.How do adults describe the impacts of high school music education on their emotions developments?

Observe commercial vehicles (e.g., semis, trains) that you see while traveling for a few days. Discuss the classes of hazardous materials that you encountered on your trips. What placards did you see the most? Did you see any classes of hazardous materials that you were surprised to see in a particular mode of transport? If you have seen any article about an accident in your area recently which involved a hazardous material, please summarize the accident, including the type of hazardous materials involved, any evacuation that might have been required, and any details about emergency response that you are aware of. Your journal entry must be at least 300 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

I need to write  Environment analysis (Enviornment factors) part:And also I will give two previous example about this environment analysis.  you can see how they write the environment. you need to see this, and understand how to write  to reach my need.our product:  Our product is an automated treat dispenser for training your puppy. It is a small, durable plastic pouch that releases treats with the press of a button. This pouch can attach to a leash or a belt loop and is most convenient when training your puppy.My work: environment factors: economic factorwrite how the economic factor would influe our product. it is just a product, not for company.

Topic:  Review the theory of interaction ritual chains. How do our emotions contribute to themaintenance of society, according to this theory?Word count: 450-500Use the following source: Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, 3rd ed., by David E. Rohall, Melissa A. Milkie, & Jeffrey W. Lucas

Lacking a large military and only possessing modest economic resources, Canada has often preferred to use soft power” to influence international norms, often through multilateral channels. Describe and analyse how Canada took a leadership role using soft power in one of the following cases: The Ottawa convention on anti personnel landmines or the Montreal protocol on the reduction of the ozone layer. In your essay, you must refer to at least three reputable academic sources . In your essay, you must include at least one table, graphic, map, photograph, diagram or other graphical tool for displaying information. Your graphical tool must be relevant to your essay. If you did not invent it, then the source of your graphical tool must be properly acknowledged.  The essay format must be in the form of an introduction, body and conclusion. The essay must include a thesis statement.