social science

Step 1. Identify a hypothetical organizational issue or problem. This issue needs to be focused on the organization, so something like: staffing, hiring, corruption, communication, socialization, overtime, staff well-being, budget, etc. Be sure to provide a solid description of the issue or problem so we all can follow along.Step 2. Situate your hypothetical issue or problem within a testable research question. For example, you’ll need to state your problem in the form of a research question. So let’s say our hypothetical problem had to do with the rate of correctional officer-inmate violent altercations. There are a number of ways you could phrase this question here. For example, your question might be: “Does increasing the number of correctional officers on duty lower the number of violent altercations per shift?” Now think ahead to what you may or may not find and ask yourself, how will an answer to this question impact policy? Also, if we were relate this question to a respective organizational theory or theoretical era, which would it be? I would say, this question reflects more traditional theoretical beliefs, where the concern is less on the people, and more on the process. Asked differently, our question might read as: “Does a deescalation training program lead to fewer violent altercations per shift?” Here, I would argue that the question follows more of an HRT approach, where staff training is more important.Step 3. Now, once you’ve stated your research question, try to identify and provide your reasoning why you believe it fits into a more traditional or more human resources theoretical framework.I’m looking for well-thought-out answers. Please take your time and be as honest as you can with your reflection statement. Please consult the discussion rubric link (above) for guidance on how to earn full credit for your discussion.

READ: The Promise from the Sociological Imagination by CW Mills.pdfDon’t forget to refer to the Discussion Board Check List.pdfFinally, note that from this discussion on, you will be unable to read or comment on posts made by your peers until you have published your own response to this discussion prompt.“The sociological imagination enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society. That is its task and its promise.”That’s an ambitious agenda but, even as a beginner, you can begin to realize that promise by asking three sorts of questions: those referring to structure, history and biography. When asking these three basic questions, you need to differentiate between the two basic elements of society (biography and history). Differentiate between the “personal troubles of the milieu” and the “public issues of structure.”Troubles occur within the character of the individual and within the range of his immediate relations with others.Issues have to do with matters that transcend the local environments of the individual and the range of his inner life.Answer the following questions based on the contemporary world (large or small, local or global) that YOU live in. You may focus on one aspect of a particular society (small-scale) or the entire society as whole. Please be sure to indicate how you’re defining society and/or if you’re focusing on one narrow subsection of a type of society:1. STRUCTURE: What is this structure of this particular society as a whole? What are the essential component parts? How do these parts relate to one another? How does this society differ from others?2. HISTORY: Where does this society stand in human history? What are the essential features of this historical period? How did/does social change happen? What macro (large-scale, structural) trends cause social problems?3. BIOGRAPHY: What varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? How is human behavior changing? In what ways are social characteristics shaped? Which characteristics are encouraged and which are repressed? How is human “nature” shaped by society’s dominant institutions?4. Write a ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY on the main point of the reading. In other words, what IS the “sociological Imagination” or sociological perspective he is outlining in the article?

Albert Camus, ‘The Myth of Sisyphus,’ (1942)1. Why does Camus describe Sisyphus in the classical myth, as an “absurd hero” (2)? Why is Sisyphus’ situation absurd for Camus? And why is he a “hero”?Answer the question in your own words. Also find examples in the text).2. In Camus’ retelling of the myth, as Sisyphus goes back down the mountain following his ascension with the rock, Camus writes:It is during that return, that pause, that Sisyphus interests me” (2).Why is Camus the most interested in this period in the myth when Sisyphus descends the mountain? Why is this moment the most important for Camus, and for his ethical theory?(Find examples in the text to support your answers). (2-3).3. At the end of the reading, why does Camus write that:“One must imagine Sisyphus happy” (4).What is Camus’ main point by concluding his essay this way?4. Finally, how do you interpret Camus’ essay in relation to the world today? Are there any parallels to our contemporary society? Also, what lessons might his ideas provide in relation to our own lives?Think about the question critically and thoughtfully, and answer in your own words.

The sociological imagination enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society. That is its task and its promise.”That’s an ambitious agenda but, even as a beginner, you can begin to realize that promise by asking three sorts of questions: those referring to structure, history and biography. When asking these three basic questions, you need to differentiate between the two basic elements of society (biography and history). Differentiate between the “personal troubles of the milieu” and the “public issues of structure.”Troubles occur within the character of the individual and within the range of his immediate relations with others.Issues have to do with matters that transcend the local environments of the individual and the range of his inner life.Answer the following questions based on the contemporary world (large or small, local or global) that YOU live in. You may focus on one aspect of a particular society (small-scale) or the entire society as whole. Please be sure to indicate how you’re defining society and/or if you’re focusing on one narrow subsection of a type of society:1. STRUCTURE: What is this structure of this particular society as a whole? What are the essential component parts? How do these parts relate to one another? How does this society differ from others?2. HISTORY: Where does this society stand in human history? What are the essential features of this historical period? How did/does social change happen? What macro (large-scale, structural) trends cause social problems?3. BIOGRAPHY: What varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? How is human behavior changing? In what ways are social characteristics shaped? Which characteristics are encouraged and which are repressed? How is human “nature” shaped by society’s dominant institutions?4. Write a ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY on the main point of the reading. In other words, what IS the “sociological Imagination” or sociological perspective he is outlining in the article?

How does geopolitical and phenomenological place influence the context of a population or community assessment and intervention? How does the nursing process is utilized to assist in identifying health issues (local or global in nature) and in creating an appropriate intervention, including screenings and referrals, for the community or population?

Based on the readings we’ve done so far, what is your understanding of the difference between laws and rights?· How, if at all has your understanding changed since the start of the quarter.· Why do we need laws if we have human rights?· Why do we need human rights if we have laws?

In the United States its illegal to pay a person for non__replenishable organs. The fear is that money will influence the poor to harm their bodies for the benefit of the rich. Do you see a parallel between the case and this law

IntroductionIn this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”.For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane.Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion’s teachings.InstructionsNow that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:A written reflectionAn oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following:Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain.Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course.Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not

From the readings on global crime prevention and gender, how do you think we should plan and build safer cities, keeping gender into account? 100 words.http://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/262-ask-questions-about-womens-safety-in-the-city.html.Read Fleming, A. (2018). What would a city that is safe for women look like? The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/dec/13/what-would-a-city-that-is-safe-for-women-look-likeAnd read Part Four in Tools for Gathering Information about Women’s Safety and Inclusion in Cities: Gender Inclusive Cities Programme: Experiences from the Gender Inclusive Cities Programme https://femmesetvilles.org/downloadable/tools%20for%20gathering%20information%20en.pdf

gentBob is a 35 year old black male who came into care on Feb. 14th 2015. He lives with his wife and two children Bob Jr. and Mary. He works at the Motor Vehicle Administration office in western Maryland. His current address is 1934 BTS Street in Baltimore Maryland, he has lived there for the past 10 years. The reason why Bob is receiving treatment is because he was driving under the influence was arrested and sentenced to mantuary therapy. He seemed like a nice man who is trying to get a better outlook on life. He has no history of incarceration and has a college degree in Math. He has no overt medical concerns.Question #1: What sentence or sentences do not belong in the statement above, please explain why.Question #2: Please describe the actions below without bias or an interpretation as you would in the Observation( Objective) section of a SOAP note#2a: Client was late and in a bad mood#2b: Client got up and slammed the door#2c: Client nodded during the meeting#2d: Client looked like he was under the influence#2e: Client became sexually excited during the meeting#2f: Client began to cuss during the meeting#2g: Client went to his car and came back in a joyful mood after drinking something out of a bottleQuestion #3: Who’s opinion is noted when writing the assessment section of a SOAP note1.Client2.Social Work manager3.Medical doctor4.Please answer , can a plan change without the worker meeting the client before a session?Please answer each question above in APA style, with a total of 300 words or more for each questionWork will be graded on the following format