Sociology

This week you will continue to work on the topic of choice to progress toward your Cultural Perspectives final paper. Select ONE of the diversity-related topics researched for your Week 3 written assignment, or select a new topic.  Then, using the APA formatted template, write a 660-1320 word paper (not including title page) that addresses the following: Describe the diversity situation or cultural dilemma and the cultural groups impacted by this topic. Explain the types of power or privilege each group possesses. In what ways are members of each group aware (or not aware) of their power or privilege? Discuss the types of prejudice or discrimination applied to each group. Is the discrimination or prejudice overt or covert? How do these (prejudice, discrimination, power or privilege) impact each group’s access to goods, services, positions of power, education, or other societal structures? Support your claims with documentation from historical perspectives, recent news activities, scholarly articles, or course resources. For more information on Cultural Perspectives read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procrastination#Cultural_perspective

The research paper is on “God’s Existence”, which should include a title, abstract, and 10 credible sources. The paper should be roughly 8-10 pages in length and all citations should be made in Chicago Manual Style (CMS). Do not use more than two philosophers. For more information on Gods Existence read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Affirmative Action (AA) are not required in today’s evolved organizational climate. EEO and AA enforce quotas on organizations that must be met during the hiring process, thus requiring them to hire unqualified people. Evaluate this statement. Do you agree or disagree? Explain. For more information on Equal Employment Opportunity  read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_employment_opportunity

Cover Page and abstract on overpopulation. Please help me it’s due tomorrow at 11:59 PM For more information read this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation

Identity in Language Learning & Teaching Assignment   Purpose:  Examine issues pertaining to identity construction in language learning and teaching. Candidates will incorporate Pavlenko and Blackledge’s (2004) three identities discussed in chapter 5 of Farrell’s book to frame and explain their research. Candidates will analyze this research as it pertains to them as language teachers and their language learners and draw conclusions as to the impact identity construction has on them and their learners. Directions/ Format: 1. Write a 7 page paper (title page & reference page not included in count) using APA format. Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced. 2. Must have a minimum of 4 resources. They must be reliable and reputable (No wikis, no blogs) You are conducting and utilizing research!! 3. Choose the topic you want to research; it must be relevant to you and the idea of identity construction in language learning in teaching. For more information on this check: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBaTbiWKB0w

Family Dynamics at the end of life -How does culture or religion affect end-of-life decisions?-How to support a grieving family member?-Benefits of family support?-3 paragraphs  2 references

Complete a 250-350-word reflection of what you learned during this topic. Include the following in your reflection: Think about an experience you’ve encountered when viewing or completing the particular assessment. Discuss difficulties that could potentially arise or specific questions related to completing this type of assessment. Include illustrative examples of potential strategies used to overcome the difficulties encountered when completing (the particular) assessment. Describe how the Christian worldview and compassion for all play a role in this type of assessment.APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A leader should constantly strive to be more well-rounded. Leadership skills should be a toolbox from which we select the tool most appropriate to the situation, not simply the tool that feels most comfortable in our grasp. Let’s explore ways to expand our abilities as a leader. Think back to two leaders from your own personal experience, one who exemplifies typical “male” leadership traits and one who exemplifies typical “female” leadership traits. (Please note that the “male” leader does not have to be male and the “female” leader does not have to be female; we are examining leadership traits, not gender.) Please explain each of their leadership styles and describe how they exhibited these characteristics. Next, identify your own leadership gender. Select the leader who is the opposite of your own leadership gender. What can you learn from his/her approach, and how could you integrate his/her leadership traits into your own emerging leadership style?

Tina Jones Neurological shadow health assessment Lifespan & Review Questions LifespanActivity Time: 10 min Tina’s three-year-old neighbor presents to the clinic with fever, neck pain, headache, and confusion. He has no symptoms of an upper respiratory infection. The parents mention that they do not believe in immunizations. Based on the information given, what diagnosis is […]

Q1  I personally do not believe that a bussiness owner has the right to deny service to same-sex couples. These are progressive times and the world has been coming to accept all different kinds of people over the years. Just because slavery was permitted under law a hundred or so years ago did not make it right. The law is not always correct or moral. We now have corrected that notion and have implented all people into society regardless of skin color. The same should be true for same-sex couples.  Using the argument of religion as an objection to bake a wedding cake for gay marraige means that African-Americans should still be objected under the same logic. The religon is not the problem in this case it is the problem of a person that is unwilling to adapt to society or accept anyone that is different from themselves. The “KKK” Is nowhere near the same as a same-sex couple. The “KKK” is a harmful organization that is hateful and disriminatory. Same sex couples do no harm to anyone and are just trying to express their individual sexuality. Opposition of same-sex couples is similar to a hateful/discriminatory organization and maybe in that case people should not be working for weddings if they are opposed to any type of gender getting married. The fact that this kind of behaviour is not outlawed can be considered a paralell from dicrimation of African Americans during segregation. Eventually it was adopted by the government as public opinion gained tracion in favor towards equality of skin color. The same will happen with gay marraige over the years as public opinion towards it has increased tremendously over the years. Aporximately 10,000,000 people in the United States are considered part of LGBT so this issue definetly is not small. Not giving rights to a certain group of people is basically admitting that they are less than anyone else in society when this is false.  I hope to one day see a world where skin color, race, sexuality and any other types of human discrepancies are not an issue in day to day society and we can all live in harmony and peace as under one label of people/citizens of America all protected under equal law. Question2  No, business owners and/or government officials should not be allowed to deny service to same-sex couples because of religious beliefs. Yes, we have the right of freedom of religion, whether it be Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, or no religion at all. Yet our government was also founded on the idea of separation of church and state. So why is it acceptable to allow Christianity to govern us, when fundamentally our government is supposed to respect the separation of church and state. “He does not have the absolute right to exercise and practice such beliefs in utter disregard of the clear constitutional rights of other citizens.” That is the best line I have heard and gets right to the core of this issue, and I will definitely be using it in the future. Members of the LQBTQ+ community have the right to be happy, should have the right to the same services as straight people, and absolutely should have the right to be themselves. You can feel one way about something, but if that belief goes against the rights of others, you can not practice that belief because it interferes with someone elses rights.I think (and hope) that the case with the wedding cake will result in the motion that refusing to bake a cake for same-sex marriage is inherently discrimination. If a bakery were to turn down a woman who wanted a cake because she is a woman, that would be discrimination. I cannot be refused service from a place because I am a woman. A black person can not be turned down from a restaurant just because of the color of their skin. Everyone has the right to live the exact same way as everyone else. LGBTQ+ people have the absolute right to be with the ones they love, and celebrate it too. Personally, if I was gay I would want to go to a bakery that supported me. I don’t want to give my business to someone who is disrespectful to who I am. I am honestly amazed at how we are in 2020, almost 2021, and same-sex marriage is still an issue. If you are arguing against the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, remember that the Bible calls us to love everyone. For more information on Same-Sex  read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same_sex