Uncategorized

What are eclipsing binary stars and how can they be used to derive the masses of the stars? https://youtu.be/pIFiCLhJmig

In many ways, the framers of the Constitution created a central government much stronger than the government created by the Articles of Confederation. Still, the framers seem to have taken great care to limit the power of the central government in various ways. Describe the ways in which the central government under the Constitution was stronger than the central government under the Articles. Describe the ways in which the framers limited the national government’s power under the new Constitution. Why might the framers have placed such limits on the government they just created

As a term project you are to market a product which you have either invented or chosen from existing products. It will be assumed that your firm has performed all necessary market research, and any reasons that you give for your decisions will be based on this research. Name of product: ____________________________________________ Description Product package (include label, design, trademark etc.) Reason for choosing this package General market(s) for your product: Business To Business Product Industrial Commercial Consumer Product Convenience Good Shopping Good Specialty Good 1 C. Segment of population that comprises your market: Age Income Geographical Parameters Occupation (if relevant) Stages in family life cycle Other segments (if applicable) Reasons for Choosing This Segment (Briefly explain reasons for choosing segment/s. Buying motives Reason for this choice How did you conduct your test market? Observation Survey Controlled Experiment Cite sources that can be used in achieving further research data: Branding: Will this product be a ___National Brand? ____ Private Brand Pricing Policy _______ Above the Market, _______ Below the Market ____With the Market Reasons for your choice Price of Product Amount of price that represents profit Amount of Price that represents cost 2 Promotion Budget How do you plan to promote your product? Include media to be used and amount of budget to be spent on each type of media. Type of sales promotion to be used and amount spent on each type of sales promotion. Attach a Sample Ad Selling method to be used. ________Retail Outlet Type: Supermarket, department store, discount store, specialty store etc. Location: National, Local, Shopping Malls, etc. Mail Order Internet e-commerce (Web Site) Personal Selling Which channel or channels of distribution do you plan to use? Intensity of Product coverage. Explain What type of product-market matching strategy do you plan to use? Which method(s) of transportation do you plan to use? ___road, ____ rail, ____air, ____sea, ____pipeline Outline any changes from introductory plans you might make in the long run. This would include a redistribution of promotion budget, changes in pricing policy, changes in market segment to be reached etc. Diagram your product life cycle approach and estimate the length of time during each cycle. Explain the uncontrollable variables effect upon your product and defend your strategy against each of these factors. Summarize your project and render a critique of what you have gained from this paper. 3 COMPOSITION OF PROJECT Using this extensive outline, you are to develop an in-depth report cover of the major areas provided in the outline. Your final report should be divided into three major sections: 4 I. Introduction: II. Discussion: The first part of your paper should provide a background of your project, reasons for your choice of idea, and the various areas you plan on discussing. A detailed examination of the areas you covered in the outline should be provided in this part. Provide a more in-depth overview as to the various areas that were cited in the outline. All areas covered are discussed in the textbook as well as in any marketing textbook. Allow yourself sufficient time so that your final paper is a creative venture. III. Critique and Summary: The concluding portion of your project should be a review and summary of the major aspects discussed in your paper, as well as a critique of your own impressions as to what you derived from tacking this venture. You many include any secondary or primary material which you have obtained.  Double spaced papers requested. Please note that the product you are to market should be an original idea or a modification of an existing product that would make it an innovative product.

Lab Report include only introduction, method and result of experiment 1 Phenomenon: Own Race Effect  Two-stage  Experiment 1: work on the own race effect and see what could we observe as a class Experiment 2: a follow-up question on experiment 1 Introduction (36%) Overview of the area Review literature related to the topic  Introduce your aim; explain its importance (What is your research is about; Why you did it) State your hypothesis and justify them (What is your expected result and why) The hypothesis of both experiment 1 and 2 Experiment 1  Method (Should contain enough information for someone to replicate the study) (28%) How did you conduct the research Participants Who participated (PSYC 2007 Students) How many participated (130) How they are selected/sampled/ recruited (eg. opportunity sampling) Identify important characteristics (eg. gender, age, year of study, ethnicity) Measures  Describe the experimental design Procedures How the data collection process took place  How was the experiment run What did we ask the participants to do Any written/ verbal instructions etc Result  State the results but don’t interpret them here  Include descriptive statistics when reporting results APA-formatted table

Should the United States policies against the Native Americans be considered “acts of genocide”? Task: In at least 2 paragraphs, please answer the above question using evidence from the past few days’ lessons on U.S. policies toward Native Americans.  Be sure to: Include at least 2 specific examples from this week’s lessons on Native Americans in your answer (1 per paragraph). Use the PowerPoint and/or the Edpuzzle video. Click here for the Youtube link to the video Explain how each example is or is not an example of a genocide.  Use the characteristics of a genocide reviewed in class as your guide. Reminder: The list of characteristics is located in the PowerPoint. You have to open the slides to do the assignment.

From a comparative approach between Egyptian Civil Law and Common Law, discuss Termination of the contract. Citation is a must. 2. Please use Times (or Times New Roman), 12 point as the font for your assignments, and 14 point for the headlines. 3. Use different resources

Record the transactions in ledger form   2. The following transactions occurred during the year. Record these transactions. a. HHL took out a long-term loan for $3 million. b. HHL purchased $1 million in inventory with cash. c. HHL purchased equipment that cost $150,000 on account. The equipment is expected to last 15 years and has no salvage value. d. $540,865,000 (net of allowances and charity care) was billed for patient services. The hospital estimates that 5% of these bills will be bad debt. e. $875,000 of inventory was used. f. Donations of $400,000 were received in cash. g. HHL pays in cash for a 2-year malpractice insurance premium at a cost of $5 million. One-half of the premium is for next year, and the other is for the following year. h. HHL pays $12,560,000 in accounts payable. i. HHL workers earned $259 million in wages for the year. The hospital paid out $282 million in cash. It also paid out $60 million in benefits, all in cash. j. The equipment purchased in transaction c was paid for in cash. k. $370,500,000 from bills sent to patients was received in cash. l. HHL collected $25 million in outstanding patient bills in cash. m. The board is concerned that too much debt outstanding is bad for the organization. The board chooses to accelerate their debt payments for the year. HHL paid out $51 million in long-term debt principal and $3 million of interest in cash. n. Depreciation for the year was recorded—$23 million for existing fixed assets. Also, calculate the new depreciation necessary for the new equipment purchased this year, assuming straight-line depreciation. o. The contract with the IT company chosen is signed. The initial contract cost is paid, as well as the first year payment. FYI HHL stands for Happy Hospital

1. Identify and define a problem of a social nature for the research (what and / or who is being investigated?) And its justification (Why are you investigating?). For this step, the assignment that is programmed in module I will help them. 2. Establish the theoretical framework or literature review on the problem to be investigated. For this step, two assignments will help them: one, programmed in module 3, on the comment of an article, chapter, etc. related to the selection of the topic to be investigated; the other, programmed in module 5, on the annotated bibliography. 3. Propose the working hypothesis of the problem to be investigated: it is an assumption that they want to offer an explanation to solve the problem posed in the investigation. That which, according to the researcher, can explain or answer the research question or questions posed. 4. Design the research: how will the research be carried out? For example, if a questionnaire is to be administered: to. Questions: i. some of a demographic nature (age, gender, etc.) ii. others of a specific nature (what you want to find out or know, which population is going to be administered, geographical area, etc.) 5. Carry out the research (experimentation): example, if a questionnaire is used, carry out the survey to the population to be investigated, in the indicated geographical area, etc. 6. Analysis of the results 7. Establish conclusions and possible solutions, based on what was investigated and, of course, with reference to the theoretical framework or literature review made. 8. Write a document on the investigated topic. 9. Introduction and conclusion

Great American books – Comparing two American authors. Essay needs to explain their books and lives. Needs to be important authors or classic writers. 1,000 words or more.

Create a 3-5-page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for a specific care issue and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question. PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.  It stands for: P – Patient/population/problem. I – Intervention. C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically). O – Outcome(s). T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant). The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are starting to apply an evidence-based model or EBPs. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health PCI(T) Process activity before you develop the plan proposal. This activity offers an opportunity to practice working through creating a PICO(T) question within the context of an issue at a Vila Health facility. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 3 successfully. This is for your own practice and self-assessment and demonstrates your engagement in the course. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies. Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence. Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision. Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue. Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence. Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style. Reference Boswell, C., Cannon, S. (2015). Introduction to nursing research. Burlington, MA: Jones Bartlett Learning. Professional Context As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted. PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. Scenario For this assessment, please use an issue of interest from your current or past nursing practice. If you do not have an issue of interest from your personal nursing practice, then review the optional Case Studies presented in the resources and select one of those as the basis for your assessment. Instructions For this assessment, select an issue of interest an apply the PICO(T) process to define the question and research it. Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your issues, as well explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question. If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document is at the bottom of instructions. In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria: Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence. Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style. Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like: Assessment 3 Example [PDF]. Additional Requirements Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Length of submission: Create a 3–5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style. Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course. Example of PICO papers. Using a PICO(T) Framework and Evidence to Develop Care PracticesWhen developing care practices for patients, the PICO(T) research framework, which expands to Population/Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time, can be used to create an effective care plan and ensure that patients’ needs are met. Relying on secondary research, the author of this paper will definea practice issue surrounding patients with dementia, apply the PICO(T) process, identify sources of evidence that may provide answers to the research question, explain key findings from articles, and explain the relevance of those key findings.Use of the PICO(T) Approach when Caring for Patients with DementiaThe practice issue identified for resolution is the need to develop care practices that effectively manage agitation in patients with dementiain nursing homesthat are outside of pharmacological approaches. The question being explored is: Is the non-pharmacological approach, specifically an intervention approach, more effective than the pharmacological approachin managing behavioral symptoms(such as agitation)in patients with dementia? The intervention approach identified is person-centeredcareor patient-centered care(PCC), an approach that emphasizes more on an individual’s experiences and the communication of his or her needs than on the pure implementation of a health care provider’s expertise (Desai, et al., 2017). The population being studiedare patients with dementiawith agitativebehavioral symptoms in nursing homes. As the objective is to explore care practices that address thisissue,only factors related to care in nursing homes are considered. The study does not take into considerationcultural, political, and social factors(Kim & Park, 2017).Identification of Sources of EvidenceDICE Model3 The DICE (Describe, Investigate, Create, and Evaluate) modelis a notable PCC interventionmodel thatidentifiesoptimal treatment options for patients with dementiawith neuropsychiatric symptoms.Developed by a panel of interdisciplinary experts at the University of Michigan Program for Positive Aging,the model is constitutive of afour-step approach.The first stepof the approachisthe accurate description of the patient’s behavior, the second is the identification ofpossible underlying causes, thethird is thecreation and implementation of treatment plans, and the fourthisthe assessment of the strategiesdeveloped(Desai et al., 2017; Kaleset al., 2014).The model’s essential recommendationsfor facilitating improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms among patients with dementiaare educatingthe caregiver;forging better communication between the patient and the caregiver;assistingthe caregiver in organizingmeaningful activitiessuch as cooking, painting, or reading depending on the patient’s interests;and training the caregiver on simplifyinghis or herworkroutines (Desai et al., 2017; Kaleset al.,2014). Individualized Intervention ModelThe individualized intervention modelis a model in which intervention activities are carried out based onthe history, needs, abilities, and preferences of patients with dementia. In this model, PCC-based activities are directly carried out by trained health care staff with expertise in social work, recreational therapy, geriatric psychiatry, and psychology (Kim & Park, 2017). Care Staff-Directed ModelIn the carestaff–directed model, PCC activities are based onthestaff’seducationandtraining on empathy and person-centeredness. The intervention period in such a model rangesfrom 3 months to 2 years(Kim & Park, 2017).Findings from ArticlesAs PCC is a major nonpharmacological approach to treatingagitation in patients with dementia, its effectiveness is studied by makingacomparative analysis to thepharmacological approach to manage behavioralsymptoms in patients with dementia. Pharmacological treatment in general refers to the use of psychotropic medication to manage agitation or neuropsychotic symptoms(NPS)in patients with dementia(Madhusoodanan & Ting, 2014; Kales et al., 2014). Some of the common pharmacological interventions include the use of antipsychotropics, antidepressants such as sertralineand citalopram,andsedative-hypnotics through the use of benzodiazepinesto control acute agitation (Madhusoodanan & Ting, 2014). The use of psychotropic medication poses high risks of mortality andharmfulside effects (Kales et al., 2014).Psychotropic medicationisalsoexpensive andisrestrictedby regulatory bodies. However, the use of pharmacological intervention isjustified when the benefits outweighthe risks or in situations whereinnonpharmacological interventions have provenunsuccessful(Madhusoodanan & Ting, 2014). The PCC approach hasproveneffectiveinaddressingthe etiologyof aggressive outbursts. Unlike the pharmacological approach, whichis based on treating symptoms, the PCC approach contributes to the resolution of underlying causes (Desai et al., 2017). The study by Kales et al. (2014) finds reasonable evidence of the DICE program’scontribution toward better clinical practicesandimprovement in aggressive behavior, and it observes that theapproach resultsin fewer hospitalizationsand readmissions.In their systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 primary studies,Kim and Park (2017) found 15 studies that measure the impact of PCC on agitation using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (an agitation mapping instrument)and the Brief Agitation Rating Scale. They found that 8 of the 15 studies show positive effects on agitation with individualized interventions (with a significant mean difference of -0.513),showing better effectsthan with carestaff–directed interventions (with a significant mean difference of -0.160). As this paper relies onsecondary research on the PCC intervention to manage agitative behaviorinpatients with dementiain nursing homes, there are multipletime frames for the various intervention studies reviewed. While some studies had a long intervention period ranging from 9 months to 2 years, othershad shorterintervention periods of just a few weeks. From the above exploration of the research problem based on the PICO(T) framework, it is clear that thisframeworkhas contributed to the delineation of precise intervention practices and has broughtconceptual clarity on the issueof agitativebehavior in patients with dementia. Relevance of Findings from ArticlesThe study by Kales et al. (2014) waschosen as it provides a comprehensive explanation of the PCC-based DICE intervention programandits potential outcomes and draws an objective comparison of the program with pharmacological intervention. The study observedthat the DICE model was developed by a panel of experts with years of clinical and research expertise in managing NPS in patients with dementia. The strategies formulated in the DICE approach were found to carryastrong evidence base. As it is evidence-informed, the DICEapproach could be helpful for clinicians across diverse settings.Kales et al. (2014)conclude their studywith a discussion onthe potential of the DICE approach in enhancing clinical practices and ensuringthetreatment of agitativebehavior in patients with dementia. The rationalefor selecting the study by Kim and Park (2017) was that it presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 primary intervention studies,of which 17 studies are from long-term care facilities. In their systematic review and meta-analysis of thesestudies, Kim and Park (2017)found that PCC has asignificant impact on reducing NPS in patients with dementia. Kim and Park’s(2017)review foundtheincreased engagement between care providers and patients and the magnitude of the program’s intensityto be the reasons for short-term PCC intervention having greater benefits in comparison to long-term intervention.The findings are relevant becausethey are based on 17 long-term, clinical PCC intervention studies comprising both controlled and non-controlled cluster-randomized trials conducted over the past 10 years (Kim & Park, 2017). Kim & Park’s findings prove to be the most credible. In their systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies, Kim and Park’s findings (2017) adhere to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. They also utilize analysis tools such as the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of biasand the risk of bias assessment toolto ensure quality screening of the studies. ConclusionThere is a need to develop care practices that are outside of pharmacological approaches for managing agitation in patients with dementia. The PICO(T) frameworkwas applied to determine if the intervention approach of person-centeredcareor patient-centered care(PCC)was more effective than the pharmacological approach by identifying sources of evidence, explaining the findings and proving the relevance of those findings. The articles by Kales et al. (2014)and Kim and Park (2017), provide precise, reliable,and relevant informationtoadequately explore the effectiveness of the PCC approach. References Desai, A., Wharton, T., Struble, L., & Blazek, M. (2017). Person-centered primary care strategies for assessment of and intervention for aggressive behaviors in dementia. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 43(2), 9–17. https://search-proquest-com.library.docview/1862119355?pq-origsite=summonKales, H. C., Gitlin, L. N., & Lyketsos, C. G. (2014). Management of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia in clinical settings: Recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert panel. Journal oftheAmerican GeriatricsSociety, 62(4), 762–769. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146407/#Kim, S. K.&Park, M. (2017). Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 12, 381–397. https://doaj.org/article/400107a4cbaa44e6b7c0e3531bb4abacMadhusoodanan, S., & Ting, M. B. (2014). Pharmacological management of behavioral symptoms associated with dementia. World Journal of Psychiatry, 4(4), 72–79. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC427458