Complex Patient Health Issues Discussions

Complex Patient Health Issues Discussions Complex Patient Health Issues Discussions Assessment item 1 – Complex patient health issues Objective(s): Learning objective: A, B, C, D and E Graduate Attribute: 2.0, 4.0 and 5.0 Weight: 50% Length: 1500 word limit +/- 10%, excluding references Task: This assessment item has 3 parts: Students will review the specific case scenario materials provided for this assignment. Using this information students will identify and prioritise the patient’s complex health issues. Students will provide rationales for their prioritisation decisions which will be supported by current literature and related healthcare regulatory frameworks and health department policies. Complex Patient Health Issues Discussions 1. Identify a total of three patient health issues from ONE of the case scenarios that nurses can address within their scope of practice . You may include ‘risk for’ or ‘potential for’ health issues. Rank the three patient health issues that were selected in part 1 in order of priority. Provide a rationale for the order of the rankings. The rationale must be supported with current literature. 3. Outline the nurse’s role in addressing the top three priority patient health issues using assessment, coordination of care and provision of care. Relate the discussion to nursing and healthcare regulatory frameworks and health department policies e.g. RN Standards for Practice, NSW health policy, National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) standards etc. Students need to demonstrate their ability to identify and prioritise patient health issues that nurses can address within their scope of practice and rationalise the order of priority. This will enable students to articulate decisions they will need to make in clinical practice. In addition, students will be able to demonstrate their ability to write clearly and succinctly to reflect their understanding. Referencing The Faculty of Health uses the UTS Harvard referencing guide or the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th referencing style for in text referencing and production of a reference list. Please refer to the following links for guidance on these referencing styles: wechat271d2e262368d61022075902e3be7e25.png inp_assessment_1__review.pdf final_inp_2020_assessment_1_rubric.pdf Assessment item 1 – Complex patient health issues Objective(s): Learning objective: A, B, C, D and E Graduate Attribute: 2.0, 4.0 and 5.0 Weight: 50% Due: Wednesday 30th September 2020 by 5pm via the designated assignment portal in UTSOnline for this subject. Length: 1500 word limit +/- 10%, excluding references Task: This assessment item has 3 parts: Students will review the specific case scenario materials provided for this assignment. Using this information students will identify and prioritise the patient’s complex health issues. Students will provide rationales for their prioritisation decisions which will be supported by current literature and related healthcare regulatory frameworks and health department policies. 1. Identify a total of three patient health issues from ONE of the case scenarios that nurses can address within their scope of practice. You may include ‘risk for’ or ‘potential for’ health issues. 2. Rank the three patient health issues that were selected in part 1 in order of priority. Provide a rationale for the order of the rankings. The rationale must be supported with current literature. 3. Outline the nurse’s role in addressing the top three priority patient health issues using assessment, coordination of care and provision of care. Relate the discussion to nursing and healthcare regulatory frameworks and health department policies e.g. RN Standards for Practice, NSW health policy, National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) standards etc. Integrated Nursing Practice (92445) Spring Session 2020 Students need to demonstrate their ability to identify and prioritise patient health issues that nurses can address within their scope of practice and rationalise the order of priority. This will enable students to articulate decisions they will need to make in clinical practice. In addition, students will be able to demonstrate their ability to write clearly and succinctly to reflect their understanding. Referencing The Faculty of Health uses the UTS Harvard referencing guide or the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th referencing style for in text referencing and production of a reference list. Please refer to the following links for guidance on these referencing styles: https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/attachments/page/InteractiveHarvardUTSGuide.pdf https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/help/referencing/apa-referencing-guide Accurate referencing using is expected – poor referencing will result in loss of marks. Marks may be deducted if the assessment is not within the word limit. Integrated Nursing Practice (92445) Spring Session 2020 Integrated Nursing Practice 92445 Assessment item 1: Complex health issues Identification of health issues Identification of the patient health issues from the case scenario that nurses will address within their scope of practice • • Weight: 50% Total of 3 patient health issues are identified. The 3 patient health issues are described comprehensively • • Due: 30th September 2020 by 5pm Total of 3 patient health issues are identified. The 3 patient health issues are described in detail • • Length: 1500 words Total of 3 patient health issues are identified. The 3 patient health issues are described without adequate detail (5 marks) • • Total of 3 patient health issues are identified. The 3 patient health issues are not described • • 3 or less (total) patient health issues identified. Complex Patient Health Issues Discussions The patient health issues identified are not related to the case study. (5 marks) (4 marks) (3.5 marks) Prioritisation of health • Comprehensive, • Clear, logical rationale for • Clear, logical rationale issues and rationale persuasive and logical order of prioritisation in for order of Rank the 3 health issues in rationale for order of detail. prioritisation, some order of priority and provide prioritisation. arguments require • High quality and current a rationale supported with more detail. • High quality and current evidence used to support literature evidence used to the ranking of priority in • Some high quality and comprehensively detail. current evidence used support the ranking of to support the ranking priority. of priority. (2.5 marks) • Clear rationale for order of prioritisation, arguments require more detail and development. • Some evidence used to support the ranking of priority. (20 marks) Nurse’s Role The role of the nurse is outlined using assessment, coordination of care and provision of care. (10 marks) (0 – 5 marks) • Clear outline of the role • Unclear outline of the of the nurse, requires role of the nurse. more links with the • Discussion not related patient health issues or to regulatory detail. frameworks and • Discussion related to health department some regulatory policies. frameworks and health • There is no evidence department policies to support this section. Discussion is related to nursing and healthcare regulatory frameworks and health department policies (20 marks) (20 marks) (16 marks) • Detailed outline of the • Detailed outline of the broad role of the nurse. broad role of the nurse. • Discussion related to • Discussion related to comprehensive range of regulatory frameworks regulatory frameworks and health department and health department policies in detail. policies. (20 marks) Integrated Nursing Practice 92445 Spring session (16 marks) (13 marks) • Clear outline of the role of the nurse, requires broader scope. • Discussion related to regulatory frameworks and health department policies, without adequate detail (13 marks) (10 marks) (0 – 2 marks) • Unclear rationale for prioritisation of the 3 chosen heath issues. • Low quality evidence used to support the ranking of priority. • There is no evidence to support this section. (0 – 5 marks) Referencing Evidence of in-text referencing and reference list provided using UTS Harvard or APA referencing style (5 Marks) •At least ten different references are utilised. •At least ten different references are utilised. •Ten different references are utilised. •Ten different references are utilised. •Less than ten different references are utilised •An accurate reference list is provided. •An accurate reference list is provided, minimal errors. •An accurate reference list is provided, minimal errors. • Reference list is accurate, some minor errors present. •Reference list provided is not accurate, multiple errors present. (5 marks) Integrated Nursing Practice 92445 Spring session (4 marks) (3.5 marks) (2.5 marks) (0 – 2 marks) … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10