Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion

Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion 2 different discussion rubics with 2 peer responses and then 2 different journal entries. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Discussion post and responses combined around 2 pages for each and Journals 1 page each = 6 pages. Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion See Attached: HCM See Attached IHP These are both topics you have already done for me. Obesity research and Organizational Problem hcm_module_6_discussion_and_module_7_journal.docx ihp_discussion_6_and_journal_8_material.docx ihp_430_discussion_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf research_rubric_discussion_undergrad.pdf Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion. HCM 440 Module Six 6-1 Discussion: Critiquing Research Reports 6-1 Discussion: Critiquing Research Reports Previous Next Continue with your review of the article chosen in Module Five. Identify the statistical tests used to analyze the data in the study. Are there other statistical analysis methods that would have been more appropriate? If so, identify them and discuss. Describe the limitations of the study. Identify and describe any factors that may have affected the results of the study. Can the results of the study be applied, and if so, to whom? How could results of the study impact healthcare practices? Explain and discuss. Hansen, L. O., Williams, M. V., & Singer, S. J. (2011). Perceptions of hospital safety climate and incidence of readmission. Health Services Research, 46(2), 596–616. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01204.x Hill, A., Etherton-Beer, C., & Haines, T. P. (2013). Tailored education for older patients to facilitate engagement in falls prevention strategies after hospital discharge—a pilot randomized controlled trial. Plos ONE, 8(5), 1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063450 Try to respond to your peers who selected the same article as you. Read their assertions—you might find it refreshing to know that others had differing opinions or analyses. Focus your responses on points that may differ from what you concluded. To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document. 1st peer response Discussion 6 Contains unread posts Melissa Francis posted Feb 7, 2021 9:48 PM Subscribe The Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organization (PSCHO) survey to analyze the data in this analysis was the key statistical test that was used in the Perceptions of Hospital Safety Climate and Frequency of Readmission study. For data gathering, the PSCHO survey used 45 objects. To apply a rating from strongly agree to strongly disagree, a 5-point Likert scale was used (Hansen, Williams & Singer, 2011). What makes this a successful study to use is that the 12 key variables in the safety environment are analyzed with respect to the readmission rates of the hospital. The use of this statistical test gave them the data needed to determine which of their theories is accurate. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion They only solidified their theory with the use of multiple regression models. The size and location that were used are the limitations that were most present in this analysis. The hospitals chosen were mainly non-teaching and received lower scores from doctors and senior management. As a result, these categories were over-sampled. They also looked only at heart failure, pneumonia, and acute myocardial infarctions and did not have details on one or more of the classifications in some hospitals. The consequence was that the information obtained from the hospitals was distorted. The scale and location of the hospitals studied were potential factors that may have influenced the findings. Other healthcare facilities and hospitals may have opportunities to recognize their own disadvantages by using the data gathered. They will be able to identify if there are any underlying problems that can lead to readmissions. This will help minimize the cost of rehospitalization not only to the patient but the hospital as well ensuring that they provide their patients with the standard of treatment required. Reference: Hansen, L. O., Williams, M. V., & Singer, S. J. (2011). Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Perceptions of hospital safety climate and incidence of readmission. Health Services Research, 46(2), 596–616. doi:10.1111/j.14756773.2010.01204. 2nd peer response 6-1 Discussion: Critiquing Research Reports Contains unread posts Ashley Krezmien posted Feb 8, 2021 11:39 AM Subscribe Within the study, the researcher used methods along the lines of logistical regression. The partakers in the study groups distinguished risk of falls and rationale to engage in falls prevention strategies before and immediately after receiving the education. Participants’ levels of awareness about and perceptions to receiving the education were summarized using descriptive statistics (number, percentage) (Hill, Etherton_Beer & Haines, 2013). Logistic regression is used in comparing the confidence levels within the two groups. The differences between groups of the proportions of participants engaging in falls prevention strategies (health behaviors) after discharge was evaluated using logistic regression with adjustment for length of observation after discharge and baseline values of these variables, and results presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (Cl) (Hill, Etherton-Beer & Haines, 2013). SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion The usage of the data was to show that awareness and preventing behaviors helps in thwarting discharged patients falling via the control and more educated group along with showing what the variance between the groups is after having different knowledge told to them. Using this method along with appropriate testing, makes sense in this study’s case. Logistic regression is capable of clearing out any data that is not needed for the study, so the accuracy of the study is better off. The researchers were careful when considering the variables that affect the potential outcomes of the research. The results of this study aid healthcare organizations knowing how to properly educate their patients, especially the elderly, with proper discharge after-care to prevent mishaps. This tailored education was received positively by older people resulted in increased engagement in falls prevention strategies after discharge and is feasible to deliver to older hospital patients (Hill, Etherton-Beer & Haines, 2013). More education means less readmittance to the organization, safer for the patient and better off for the organization. References: Hill, A., Etherton-Beer, C., & Haines, T.P. (2013). Tailored education for older patients to facilitate engagement in falls prevention strategies after hospital discharge-a pilot randomized controlled trial. Plos ONE, 8(5), 111. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063450 Journal 7 7-2 Journal: Putting the Pieces Together Assignment Reflect on the knowledge and skills that you have gained throughout this course. What do you see as having the most impact on your role as a healthcare administrator/leader? Be sure to support your thoughts with at least two current, evidence-based sources. For additional details, please refer to the Journal Rubric document. IHP Discussion 6-1 6-1 Discussion: Culture of Safety Discussion Topic Starts Feb 6, 2021 11:59 PM Discus the importance of using benchmarking tools and how they promote a culture of safety in healthcare organizations. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Examine the importance of effective teams and how they contribute to high-quality care and culture safety in the organization. When responding to your peers, compare and contrast their answers to your own. To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document. 1st Peer discussion to respond to: Safety Paul Horn posted Feb 9, 2021 7:07 AM Subscribe Hello Class, I feel like I keep going back to same well and that is my experiences in the Army Military Health System and how we handle things. Then I think that I am also informing others, you my classmates, with how your military and your tax paying dollars are being used in this way. Benchmarking tools are an important way of comparing your organization with other organizations as well as your internal organizations. How thing could be improved based on the utilization and data collected in these tools. The US Army uses risk management and describes it as the process of identifying, assessing, and controlling risks arising from operational factors and making decisions that balance risk cost with mission benefits (Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2014). One of the main ways the Army creates a culture of safety is by the utilization of a survey tool call the Army Readiness Assessment Program (ARAP) Survey. ARAP is a Web-based initiative that provides battalion-level commanders with data on their formation’s readiness posture through five segments: Process Auditing – Assesses the processes used to identify hazards and correct problems Reward Systems – Assesses the unit’s program of rewards and discipline to reinforce proper behavior and correct risky actions Quality Control – Places emphasis on high standards of performance Risk Management – Assesses the health of unit processes Command and Control – Assesses leadership, communication, and policies as they relate to Risk Management (RM) Following the survey administration (the assessment phase), the commander receives one-on-one feedback on key issues regarding command climate, safety culture, resource availability, workload, estimated success of certain safety intervention programs, and other factors relating to their unit’s overall readiness (Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2021). SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Using this survey, those within an organization can answer without fear of reprisal due to the survey being anonymous. The Army as a whole tracks which organizations are in compliance and have conducted the surveys. The Army also uses the data to compare against other organizations to see what can be shared as lessons learned to improve things across all organizations. The downfall with this survey is much like reviews on yelp, most people are eager to complain about things that are going wrong but not as motivated about things going right, so the survey is normally skewed to the negative. The survey is not mandatory and must be conducted by at least 60 percent of an organization to be considered valid. References Headquarters, Department of the Army. (2014, April). Risk Management ATP 5-19. Retrieved from Army Publishing Directorate: https://armypubs.army.mil/ Headquarters, Department of the Army. (2021, FEB 09). Army Readiness Assessment Program. Retrieved from U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center: https://arap.safety.army.mil/ less 2nd Peer discussion to respond to View profile card for Megan McIntosh Discussion 6-1: Culture of Safety Megan McIntosh posted Feb 8, 2021 6:50 PM Subscribe This page automatically marks posts as read as you scroll. Adjust automatic marking as read setting Benchmarking is commonly seen as a process of comparing an organization’s processes and outcomes against those of other organizations. Benchmarking is a shorthand and ongoing method of improvement that does not require an organization to discover better ways of doing things or reinvent practices already in use by others (Ross, 2014 ,p.512). When looking to choose a benchmarking tool, there are four options: • Internal- Easiest, comparison of one department or division with another • Industry- Comparison against industry performance • Competitive- Comparison against rival • Functional- Identification and comparison against a recognized leader in performance of a process; may not be in the same industry Given that the primary goal of benchmarking is self-assessment, a healthcare organization can assess whether they have a strong safety culture, or whether it is a laissez-faire culture. The healthcare organization should ask themselves are they performing effectively and efficiently in creating a positive safety culture. Is their current safety culture meeting the standards of providing patients with safe and quality care? If a healthcare organization compares themselves internally, against the industry and their competitor and they come out on top, the short comings of others will push staff to continue to operate at a high-level of excellence in patient safety. Team effectiveness is the capacity a team has to accomplish the goals or objectives administered by authorized personnel or the organization (Wikipedia, 2021). In order to provide and contribute to high-quality care and the safety culture of the healthcare organization, departments and teams must be effective. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion A lack of team effectiveness will cause a breakdown of the organization on all levels and will affect patient care. Patient safety experts agree that communication and teamwork skills are essential for providing quality health care. When all clinical and nonclinical staff collaborate effectively, health care teams can improve patient outcomes, prevent medical errors, improve efficiency and increase patient satisfaction (Bhatt, D.O. & Swick, R.N., 2017). References Ross, T. K. (2014). Health Care Quality Management: Tools and Applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved February 08, 2021, from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781118603642/cfi/5!/4/[email protected]:0.00 Bhatt, D.O., J., & Swick, R.N., M. (2017, March 15). Focusing on Teamwork and Communication to Improve Patient Safety: AHA NEWS. Retrieved February 08, 2021, from https://www.aha.org/news/blog/2017-03-15-focusing-teamwork-and-communicationimprove-patientsafety#:~:text=Patient%20safety%20experts%20agree%20that,efficiency%20and%20increase% 20patient%20satisfaction. Team Effectiveness. (2020, April 17). Retrieved February 08, 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_effectiveness 8-1 Journal: Final Reflection Instructions Reflect on the course outcomes. What have you learned from the course that you may use in your future career? What goals will you use in your career? For additional details, please refer to the Module Eight Journal Guidelines and Rubric document. IHP 430 Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Expectations for Posting: Initial post (1): ? Composed of a minimum of two to three paragraphs ? In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. ? In Modules Two through Eight, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. ? Considers material (course content, other discussion topic, etc.) from the current module and previous modules ? Includes references as needed, for both initial posts and responses (make sure you are using proper APA formatting and citation) Critical Elements Comprehension Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Timeliness Engagement Writing (Mechanics) Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail. Responded to two or more peers (100%) Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise. Uses proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) Response posts (2): ? Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post ? In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Eastern Time. ? In Modules Two through Eight, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. ? Must have more depth and thought than simply “I agree” or “you are wrong” Proficient Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85%) Submits initial post on time (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail. Responded to two or more peers (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) Value 30 Submits initial post one day late (55%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail. Responded to only one peer (55%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail or fails to respond to peers (0%) 20 Writes posts that are easily understood. Uses proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85%) Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55%) Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) 20 Earned Total 30 100% Undergraduate Discussion Rubric Overview Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Directions For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts. For your initial post, do the following: ? Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs. ? In Module One, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. ? In Modules Two through Eight, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. ? Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources. For your response posts, do the following: ? Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread. ? In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. ? In Modules Two through Eight, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. ? Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt. SNHU IHP 430 Mod 6 Descriptive Statistics & Multiple Regression Discussion Rubric Critical Elements Comprehension Timeliness Engagement Exemplary Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) N/A Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Proficient Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using adequate organization and detail (85%) Submits initial post on time (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85%) Needs Improvement Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (55%) Submits initial post one day late (55%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (55%) Not Evident Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) Value 40 Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) 10 30 Critical Elements Writing (Mechanics) Exemplary Writes posts that are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) Proficient Writes posts that are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (85%) Needs Improvement Writes posts that are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (55%) Not Evident Writes posts that others are not able to understand and does not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) Value 20 Total 100% … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10